The social impacts on leadership in higher education in Malaysia

Teng , Jane Yan Fang

QR Code Link :
Type :	Article
Subject :	LB Theory and practice of education
ISSN :	2232-0032/eISSN 0128-0481
Main Author :	Teng , Jane Yan Fang
Title :	The social impacts on leadership in higher education in Malaysia
Hits :	2

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
Year of Publication :	2013
Notes :	Vol. 3 (2013): Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought (JCIT)
Corporate Name :	Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
PDF Full Text :	You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun

The study investigated the external factors specifically on the social impacts towards leadership in Higher education in Malaysia. The paper aims to highlight the social impacts in the areas namely, indirect communication, preserving face, status gap, self-interest, and Malaysian culture towards the leadership in higher institutions. The study employed a qualitative paradigm where a total of thirty two respondents were interviewed. The findings show that social impacts contribute significantly towards the construction of leadership and leadership effectiveness at Higher Education in Malaysia. Thus, this implies that leadership is being constructed by the surrounding environment, that a simple formula for leadership does not exist. Keywords Leadership, higher education, social impact, culture, communication

References

Carrol, B., Levy, L., & Richmond, D. (2008). Leadership as Practice. Challenging the

Competency Paradigm. Vol 4, 363 ‒ 376.

Cherry, K. (2013 ).The great man theory of leadership: A brief overview of the great Man theory

of leadership. about.com Psychology.

Davies J., Hides M.T., & Casey S. (2001). Total Quality Management. Volume 12, Numbers

7‒8, 1, pp. 102 ‒1030(6).

Ford, J. (2010). Studying leadership critically: a psychosocial lens on leadership identities.

Leadership Journal, 6(1), 1 ‒ 19.

Hall, J. W. (1998). Leadership in accreditation and networked learning. The American Journal

of Distance Education,. 12 (2), 5 ‒ 15.

Hay, M. (2008). Research into teacher effectiveness: A model of teacher effectiveness. London:

DfEE, DfEE Research Report 216.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions,

and organizations across nations (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage

Publications, Inc.

HAslam, S.A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London:

Sage.

Jane, T. Thuraiya, Z. & Suzyanthy, M. S. (2011). The best practices of transformational

leadership in developing qualities of good teachers. Journal of Contemporary Issues and

Thought, 1, 147 ‒ 155.

Kennedy, J.C. (2002). Leadership in Malaysia: Traditional values, international outlook.

Academy of Management Executive 16(3), 15 ‒ 26.

Lassey, W. R. & Fernanadez, R. R. (1976). Leadership and social change. California: University

Associates.

Lee, M. N. N. (2000). Expanding the State Role in Malaysian Higher Education. International

Higher Education, 20, 20 – 21.

Mansor, N. & Kennedy, J. (2000). Malaysian culture and the leadership of organizations: A

Globe study. Malaysian Management Review, Vol. 35, Issue, 2.

Middlehurst, R. & Elton, L. (1992). Studies in Higher Education, Vol 17, Number 3, 1992, pp.

251 ‒ 264(14).

McCaffery, P. (2010). The Higher Education Manager’s Handbook. New York: Routhledge

Falmer.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page