UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| This study investigates the sensitivity of managerial ownership on company performance of public listed companies in Malaysia. Three years panel data of 730 Malaysian public listed companies were examined. The results showed that that the managerial ownership affected the firm performance at different levels of ownership. The low and moderate level of managerial ownership showed a positive and significant with ROA, ROE, Tobin_s Q and share price. This is due to the low and moderate level of ownership, the managers having aligned their interests with those of the shareholders. However, the concentrated managerial ownership had negative and significant relationship with all performance indicators. Therefore, the involvement of management in monitoring and controlling activities fail to reduce agency conflict in the emerging economy. This study is perhaps the first that explain the different level of managerial ownership in relation to company performance utilizing extended agency theory in developing country.
Keywords Managerial ownership, performance, Malaysia |
| References |
Cho, M. H. (1998). Ownership structure, investment and the corporate value: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1), 103-121.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. (2002). The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation. Journal of Financial Economic, 58(1-2), 81-112.
Demsetz , H and Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93(6), 1155-1177.
Demsetz , H and Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 209-233.
Faccio, M. & Lan, L.H.P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65: 365-395.
Fama, E.F. & Jensen, M. (1983). Agency problem and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 327-349.
Fan, J. & Wong, T.J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 33, 401-425.
Florackis, C., Kostakis, A., & Ozkan, A. (2009). Managerial ownership and performance. Journal of Business Research, 62, 1350-1357.
Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometric, 4th Ed. New York: McGraw-hill Higher education.
Hermalin, B. E & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effect of the board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20(4), 101-121.
Himmelberg, C.P., Hubbard, R.G. & Palia, D. (1999). Understanding the determinant of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial economic, 53(3), 353-384.
Holderness, C. G., Kroszner, R. S., & Sheehan, D. P. (1999). Were the good old days that good? Changes in managerial ownership since the Great Depression. Journal of Financial Economics, 54(2), 435-469.
Hu, Y., &Izumida, S. (2008). Ownership concentration and corporate performance: A causal analysis with Japanese panel data. Corporate Governance, 16(4), 342-358.
Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economic, 3, 305-350.
Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., Muller, K. E., & Nizam, A. (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleiffer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54 (2), 471-517.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleiffer, A. &Vishny, R.W. (1997). Legal Determinants of External Finance. Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131-1150.
Loderer, C. & Martin, K. (1997). Executive stock ownership and performance: Tracking faint traces. Journal of Financial Economics, 45, 223-255.
McConnell, J. & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on Equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 131-157.
Ming T. C. & Gee C. S (2008). The influence of ownership structure on corporate performance of Malaysian Public Listed Companies. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 25(2).195-208.
Mohd Abdullah, J., Nooraisah, K., Nor Hanani, A. R., Khalid, I. (2014). Managerial ownership and market-based performance indicators: Extended agency theory. Journal of Comtemporary Issues and Thought, 4, 8-19.
Morck, R., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
Noe, T. (2002). Institutional activism and financial market structure. Review of Financial Market Studies, 15, 289-319.
Norusis, M. J. (2000). SPSS 10.0 Guide to data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (version 12), 2nd Ed., Open University Press, Sydney, Ligare Pty Ltd.
Perrini, F., Rossi, G., & Rovetta, B. (2008). Does ownership structure affect performance? Evidence from the Italian market. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(2), 312-325.
Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52 (2), 737-782.
Short, H., Zhang, H., and Keasey, K. (1999). Managerial ownership and the performance of firms: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Corporate Finance 5: 79-101.
Steven, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 3rd ed. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tabachnick, B. G., &Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
Tam O. K., & Tan, M. G. (2007). Ownership, governance and firm performance in Malaysia. Corporate Governance: An International Review,15(2), 208-222.
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |