UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : |
Penulisan ini akan membincangkan faktor-faktor penerimaan guru terhadap pendekatan Pembelajaran Teradun berdasarkan model-model penerimaan terdahulu yang telah stabil. Faktor-faktor penerimaan guru terhadap pendekatan Pembelajaran Teradun dikenal pasti melalui tinjauan literature dan tinjuan ringkas-temubual semi berstruktur. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk membincangkan secara terperinci pembentukan dan penetapan faktor-faktor penerimaan guru terhadap Pembelajaran Teradun berdasarkan model-model terdahulu bagi persekitaran pembelajaran sekolah-sekolah Malaysia. Hasil penulisan ini diharap dapat memberi gambaran lengkap berkenaan faktor-faktor penerimaan guru dan ianya mampu menjadi panduan kepada pelaksana polisi bagi menjayakan pendekatan Pembelajaran Teradun di Malaysia |
References |
1. Abdul Latif, G., & Lajiman, J. (2011). A Study of Student’s Perception of Teaching and Learning in Instructional Design and Technology Faculty of Languages and Communication. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(15), 80–86. 2. Abdulahi, A. A., NorHidayati, Z., & Elmi, A. H. (2012). An Evaluation of Virtual Learning Environment Readiness in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 2, 86–94. 3. Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 82–107. 4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. In Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (pp. 179–211). Academic Press, Inc. http://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T . 5. Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics’ Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155. 6. Alshibly, H. (2014). An Empirical Investigation into Factors Influencing the Intention to Use E-learning System : An Extended Technology Acceptance Model. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 4(17), 2440–2457. 7. Attuquayefio, S. N., & Addo, H. (2014). Using the UTAUT model to analyze students’ ICT adoption. Journal of Technology, 10(3), 75–86. 8. Bandura, A. (1989). Social Cognitive Theory. The American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175. 9. Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M. D., Butler, M., & Cho, S.-J. (2014). Effects of Blended Instructional Models on Math Performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423–437. http://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527240. 10. Briggs, K. C. (2014). Pembelajaran Teradun vs Face-to-Face Instruction : A Quantitative Evaluation of Student Achievement in Algebra I. Northcentral University. 11. Carman, J. M. (2005). Pembelajaran Teradun Design : 5 Key Ingredients. Instructional Design. Retrieved from http://www.agilantlearning.com/instructionaldesign.html. 12. Chang, C. C., Shu, K. M., Liang, C., Tseng, J. S., & Hsu, Y. S. (2014). Is blended e-learning as measured by an achievement test and self-assessment better than traditional classroom learning for vocational high school students? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(2), 213–231. 13. Cimermanová, I. (2013). Teacher Training in the Virtual Learning Environment. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(10), 1–8. 14. Davis, F. ., Bagozzi, R. ., & Warshaw, P.. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8). http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982. 15. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. http://doi.org/doi.org/10.2307/249008. 16. Davis, F. D. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x. 17. Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2013). Effect of Pembelajaran Teradun environment on transfer of learning: an experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 518–529. http://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12009. 18. Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Examine Faculty Use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) In Higher Education Institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(June (2)), 210–232. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281842180. 19. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 20. Foong Mae, C. (2002). ICT in Malaysian Schools : Policy and Strategies. Education Technology Division, Malaysia, Ministry of Education, Malaysia. 21. Graham, C. R., & Dziuban, C. (2008). Pembelajaran Teradun Environments. In The Handbook of Pembelajaran Teradun; global perspectives (pp. 269–276). http://doi.org/10.1080/02652030701883203. 22. Hamzah, M. I., Embi, M. A., & Ismail, A. (2010). ICT and diversity in learners’ attitude on Smart School initiative. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 728–737. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.099. 23. Heckman, R., Østerlund, C. S., & Saltz, J. (2015). Pembelajaran Teradun at the Boundary : Designing a New Internship. Online Learning, 19(3), 111–128. 24. Hoque, K. E., Ahmad Zabidi, A. R., & Fatema Zohora, M. (2012). ICT Utilization among School Teachers and Principals in. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1(4), 17–34. 25. Huang, R., Ma, D., & Zhang, H. (2008). Towards a Design Theory of Pembelajaran Teradun Curriculum. In Hybrid Learning and Education; Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5169, pp. 66–78). Retrieved from http://download.springer.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/static/pdf/593/chp:10.1007/978-3-540-85170-7_6.pdf?auth66=1409966034_12a6e73b41d81f29a26638b01b6c9b07&ext=.pdf. 26. Isiguzel, B. (2014). The Pembelajaran Teradun Environment on the Foreign Language Learning Process : A Balance for Motivation and Achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 15(3(10)), 108–122. 27. Isman, A., Abanmy, F. A. A., Hussein, H. B., Al Sandany, M. A., Barakat, H., Saadany, A., & Abdelrahman, M. (2012). Using Pembelajaran Teradun in Developing Student Teachers Teaching Skills. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 336–345. 28. Juinn Bing Tan, P. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan. SAGE Open, 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013503837. 29. Kazu, I. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2014). Effect of Pembelajaran Teradun Environment Model on High School Students’ Academic Achievement. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 78–87. 30. Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. (2013). Maklum Balas Ke Atas Laporan Ketua Audit Negara Siri 3. 31. Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Pascot, D., & Bytha, A. (2014). UTAUT Model for Pembelajaran Teradun : The Role of Gender and Age in the Intention to Use Webinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10, 33–52. 32. Kong, S. C., Chan, T.-W., Griffin, P., Hoppe, U., Huang, R., Kinshuk, Yu, S. (2014). E-learning in School Education in the Coming 10 Years for Developing 21st Century Skills: Critical Research Issues and Policy Implications. Education Technology & Society, 17(1), 70–78. 33. Lee, L.-T., & Hung, J. C. (2015). Effects of blended e-Learning: a case study in higher education tax learning setting. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 5(1), 13. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-015-0024-3. 34. Mohamed Amin, E., Norazah, M. N., & Ebrahim, P. (2014). Overview of Pembelajaran Teradun. In E. Mohamed Amin (Ed.), Blended & Flipped Learning : Case Studies in Malaysian HEIs (p. 33). Centre for Teaching & Learning Technologies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia & Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education Malaysia. 35. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192. 36. Nuanmeesri, S. (2014). A Design of the Infrastructure and Computer Network for Distance Education, Online Learning via New Media, E-Learning and Pembelajaran Teradun. International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 8(9), 1579–1582. 37. Nur Syamimi, M. R., & Noraffandy, Y. (2010). Pembelajaran Teradun: Overcome The Weaknesses of E-Learning and Traditional Approach. Edupress 2010. Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/14929/. 38. Pettiward, J. (2011). Putting the Learn Back into Weblearn – using a VLE to promote independent learning. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 7, 141–147. 39. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Newyork Free Press (3rd Editio). New York: The Free Press. http://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:126680. 40. Searson, M., Laferriere, T., & Nikolow, R. (2011). Barriers to successful implementation of technology integration in educational settings. In International Summit on ICT in Education 2011 (p. 5). http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004. 41. Shamsuddin, H. (n.d.). Integrating ICT in Teaching and Learning: Countrty Report: Malaysia. 42. Shin, W. S., & Kang, M. (2015). The Use of a Mobile Learning Management System at an Online University and Its Effect on Learning Satisfaction and Achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 110–130. 43. Shivam, R., & Singh, S. (2015). Implementation of Pembelajaran Teradun in Classroom : A. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(11), 369–372. 44. Siang, J. J., & Santoso, H. B. (2015). Students’ Perspective of Learning Management System : An Empirical Evidence of Technology Acceptance Model in Emerging Countries. Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, VI (2), 1–14. 45. Singh, H. (2003). Building Effective Pembelajaran Teradun Programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51–54. http://doi.org/10.1021/es2033229. 46. Siti Nazuar, S. (2014). Barriers influencing teacher’s technology integration in their teaching practice. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(23), 352–357. 47. Songkram, N. (2015). E-learning System in Virtual Learning Environment to Develop Creative Thinking for Learners in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 674–679. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.600. 48. Stratton, T. M. (2014). A Case Study of the Integration of 21st Century Technology within the Place-Based, Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound (ELOB) Approach to Education. Instructional Technology Education Specialist Research Papers, (16), 1–59. http://doi.org/http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/edu-papers/16 This. 49. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. a. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research. http://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144. 50. Teo, T., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015). Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers : Does gender matter ? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 235–251. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.v0i0.1672. 51. Thomas, T., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(3), 71–85. 52. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926. 53. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. http://doi.org/10.2307/30036540. 54. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology : Extending the Unified Theory. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. 55. Wan Zah, W. A., Hajar, M. N., Azimi, H., & Hayati, A. (2009). The conditions and level of ICT integration in Malaysian Smart Schools. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 5(2), 21–31. Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id=618&layout=html. 56. Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the Pembelajaran Teradun Literature : Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380–393. 57. Wayne, J. (2012). Effective Learning - Pembelajaran Teradun and Virtual Learning Environment. Retrieved from http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/effective-learning-blended-learning-and-virtual-learning-environment. 58. Wong, L., Tatnall, A., & Burgess, S. (2014). A framework for investigating Pembelajaran Teradun effectiveness. Education + Training, 56(2), 233–251. http://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049. 59. Zaharah, H., Saedah, S., Ghazali, D., & Nur Hasbuna, M. S. (2015). Kajian Model Pembelajaran Teradun Dalam Jurnal Terpilih: Satu Analisa Kandungan. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 3(1), 20–31. Retrieved from juku.um.edu.my |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |