|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| The purpose of this research was to compare the Omani and Malaysian students' motivation toward science learning in secondary schools. Motivation is an important component from any teaching and learning process. The results of previous studies revealed that students with better motivation usually perform better in school grades. The sample size is 359 students: 37.6% of them were Malaysian (135 students) while 62.4% were Omani (224 students). The 30-item Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ) was used in this research. It was developed by Glynn, Taasoobshirazi and Brickman. The results showed that the students had a “moderate” motivation in general. Regarding the subcategories, the students had “high Extrinsically Motivation” while they had a “moderate” level of motivation in the other subcategories or motivational factors. An independent-samples t-test was conducted to compare the motivation towards science scores of Omani and Malaysians. This finding implied that the Omani students were more motivated to science learning than the Malaysian students. On the other hand, the result showed that there was a significant difference between male and female whereas the females were highly motivated to science learning in general, but both of them had the same level of self-efficacy. |
| References |
1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 2. Bloom, J. W. (1992). The development of scientific knowledge in elementary school children: A context of meaning perspective. Science Education, 76(4), 99-413. 3. Bloom, J. W. (1995). Assessing and extending the scope of children’s context of meaning: Context Map as Pedagogical perspective, International Journal of Science Education, 17 (2), 167-187. 4. Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M. and Kittleson, J. M. (2011), “Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science”. Science Education 95: 1049–1065. 5. Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience Majors Learning Science: A Theoretical Model of Motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (8), 1088–1107. 6. Kong, S. C. (1993). Minat pelajar terhadap Sains dan Teknologi: Satu pandangan sedunia. Buletin, JNSP, V (III), 15-21. 7. Lee, M. N. N (1989). Science for all: Implications for curriculum efforts. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 12 (1), 16-27. 8. Ng, K. T; Soon, S. T & Fong, S. F. (2010). Development of a Questionnaire to Evaluate Students Perceived Motivation towards Science Learning Incorporating ICT Tool. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 10 (1), 39-55. 9. Othman, T; W, S. L; Shah, C. & Nabilah, A. (2009). Uncovering Malaysian Students’ Motivation to Learn Science. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (2), 266-276. 10. Sevinç, B., Özmen,H. & Yiğit, N. (2011). Investigation of primary students’ motivation levels towards science learning. Science Education International. Vol.22, No.3, September 2011, 218-232. 11. Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation from some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3-25. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |