Continuous teacher education process in school

Abdul Majid Halimah, Chuah Beng Ean, Eow Yee Leng,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
ISSN :	2232-0458
Main Author :	Abdul Majid Halimah, Chuah Beng Ean, Eow Yee Leng,
Title :	Continuous teacher education process in school

Place of Production :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :	2016

Abstract :

The school administrators in Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Putrajaya Presint 11(1) (SMKPP) took the initiatives of doing differently from what they had been doing. Sample of this study consisted of 89 secondary school teachers from SMKPP. Malaysian Education Standards Quality (Standard 4) instrument was used to evaluate teachers’ performance during teaching and learning (T&L) process in the classroom. Paired-samples t-test analyses on teachers’ performance were carried out at .05 level of confidence, between years. Although teachers’ performance was in the range of excellence with the mean score beyond 90 in year 2015, yet there were significant decline within the dimensions of delivery methods, enhancement of mastery learning among students, communication skills, resource application, assessment conducted, questioning skills and overall performance. With the initiatives taken by the school’s administrators through continuous teachers’ education process and renewal practices in school, by mid-year of 2016, teachers started showing improvements with significant results in their communication skills, initiative in applying various resources during T&L processes in the classroom, assessment conducted, questioning skills, classroom management skills and overall performance.

References

1. Bennett, N., & Anderson, L. (2003). Rethinking educational leadership: Challenging the conventions. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication, Inc. 2. Cardon, A. (2008). Coaching questions. Retrieved from http://www.metasysteme-coaching.fr/english/iii-coaching-questions-and-powerful-questions/. 3. Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). A positive revolution in change: Appreciative inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. 4. Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. M. (2008). Appreciative inquiry handbook: For leaders of change (2nd edition). Brunswick, OH; San Francisco: Brown Custom Publishing, Inc.; Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. 5. Day, C. S., Hopkins, P., D. Harris, A. Leithwood, K. Gu, & et al. (2010). 10 stong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: National College for Leadership of Schools and Children’s Services. 6. DuFour, R., & Mattos, M. (2013). How do principals really improve schools? The Principalship, 70(7), 34–40. 7. Eow, Y. L., Chuah, B. E., & Halimah, B. A. M. (2013). What Does An Excellent School Leader Do? In 3rd Regional Conference on Educational Leadership and Management (RCELAM) 2013 (19-21 November 2013). Genting Highlands: Institut Aminuddin Baki. 8. Halimah, B. A. M., & Eow, Y. L. (2014). Model pendidikan berkualiti 6S. Jurnal Pendidikan MPSM, 2014(1), 145–164. 9. Halimah, B. A. M., Eow, Y. L., & Chuah, B. E. (2011). SMK Putrajaya Presint 11(1) towards an effective school. Paper presented at Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Management and Leadership (APCEMaL): Educational Management and Leadership – Fostering a Learning Culture for Success, November 29 – December 1, 2011, The Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur. 10. Halimah, B. A. M., Eow, Y. L., & Chuah, B. E. (2013). Budaya Awal Pagi Membentuk Kemenjadian Murid SMK Putrajaya Presint 11(1). In Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan Kali ke‐20 Tahun 2013. Genting Highlands: Institut Aminuddin Baki. 11. Halimah, B. A. M., Eow, Y. L., & Chuah, B. E. (2014). More time is needed. In Paper presented at Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Management and Leadership (APCEMaL) 2014: Shaping Global Educational Leaders and Managers, 24 – 26November, 2014, Thistle Hotel, Johor Bahru. 12. Hawk, K., & Hill, J. (2003). Coaching teachers: Effective professional development but difficult to achieve. In AARE/NZARE Conference, Auckland, December 2003. 13. India Department of School Education and Literacy. (2012). Restructuring and reorganization of the centrally sponsored scheme on teacher education. India: Government of India. 14. International Council on Education and Teaching. (2012). 56th year book on teacher education. Ghana: University of Cape Coast. 15. Lebrun, M. (2007). Quality towards an expected harmony: Pedagogy and Technology speaking together about innovation. AACE Journal, 15(2), 115–130. 16. Lifelong Learning Council Queenland. (2016). What is lifelong learning? Retrieved July 2, 2016, from http://www.llcq.org.au/01_cms/details.asp?ID=12. 17. Martinetz, C. F. (2007). Appreciative inquiry as an organizational development tool. Performance Improvement, 41(8), 34–39. 18. Ministry of Education. (2012). Preliminary report: Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education, Malaysia. 19. Obanya, P. (2012). Looming threats to teachers, teaching and education. In International Council on Education and Teaching (Ed.), 56th Year Book on Teacher Education (p. 15–). Ghana: University of Cape Coast. 20. Pantazis, S., & Sakellariou, M. (2011). The education of future educators – Pre-school teachers in the Pedagogical Schools through their own perspective: A pan-Hellenic research. In P. Anastasiades, P. Calogiannakis, K. Karras, & C. C. Wolhuter (Eds.), Teacher Education in Modern Era: Trend and Issues (pp. 37–58). Greece: University of Crete. 21. Pashiardis, G., & Pashiardis, P. (2011). Investigating teachers’ excellence in Cyprus. In P. Anastasiades, P. Calogiannakis, K. Karras, & C. C. Wolhuter (Eds.), Teacher Education in Modern Era: Trend and Issues (pp. 59–71). Greece: University of Crete. 22. PEMANDU. (2014). Improving students outcomes overview. Retrieved from http://www.pemandu.gov.my/gtp/Improving_Students_Outcomes-@-Improving_Students_Outcomes_Overview.aspx. 23. Strauss, V. (2013). What it’s like in school to have principal after principal. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/09/13/what-its-like-to-have-principal-after-principal-after-principal/. 24. Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2009). Supervision that improves teaching and learning: Strategies and techniques. California, US: Corwin / Sage. 25. UK Department for Education. (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper 2010. London: Crown.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page