Relationship between student teachers achievement in Professional Education Courses and their achievement in Teaching Practices

Othman Ikhsan, Md Salleh Norila,

Abstract

Professional Education Course (PEC) and Teaching Practice (TP) are two main components in teacher education program. This paper discusses findings of a study to identify the relationship between students' achievement in PEC and their achievement in TP. Grades achieved by the students in PEC and their grades achieved in TP were used and analyzed with permission from the Academic Department of a selected university. The data of 1,888 students were from 28 programs conducted at the university. Spearman's rho correlation via SPSS version 23 was used for data analysis. There were five sub courses under PEC that were analyzed in this study. The analysis found that, only students’ achievement in three courses of PEC showed significant correlation with their achievement in TP with correlation indexes in a range of .046 < r < .088 at p ≤ .05. It showed that there was a weak significant correlation between students’ achievement in PEC and the students’ achievement in TP. Students’ achievement in the remaining two courses of PEC had no significant correlation with their achievement in TP. Therefore, it can be said that students' achievement in PEC cannot be used as predictor to the students’ achievement in TP. However, from random interviews of the students, PEC was said to have positive contribution to them in performing their TP. Further equivalent studies are needed to be conducted in order to get idea on the consistency of the relationship between students' achievement in PEC and their achievement in TP.

References

1. Aminah Ayob (2007). Kajian Keberkesanan Program Latihan Mengajar Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Sultan Idris Education University Research Grant: 07-20-0001-08/PBU (Not Published). 2. Carlos Nunes Silva (2013). Ex Post Facto Study. Retrieved 21 November, 2013 from http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/encyc-of-research-design/n145.xml. 3. Center of Teaching Practice and Industrial Training (2013). Buku Panduan Latihan Mengajar. Tanjong Malim: Sultan Idris Education University. 4. Coakes, S.J. & Steed, L.G. (2003). SPSS: Analysis Without Anguish. Version 11.0 for Windows. Singapore: John Willey & Sons. 5. Eftah Moh @ Abdullah & Izazol Idris. (2014). Mengenal pasti kefahaman guru berhubung pentaksiran sekolah di daerah Kinta, Perak, Malaysia. In Proceeding 6th International Conference on Teacher Education: The Standardardization of Teacher Education – Asian Qualification Framework (pp. 1310-1325). Bandung: Universiti Pendidikan Indonesia. 6. Faculty of Education and Human Development (2010). Buku Panduan Akademik Sesi 2010/2011. Tanjong Malim: Sultan Idris Education University. 7. Furlong, J. (2000). The Role of Higher Education in Initial Teacher Training. London: Kogan Page. 8. Goh, P.S.C. & Wong, K.T (2015). Exploring the Challenges for Teacher Educators. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education Vol. 5, No. 1, June 2015, 37-45. 9. Goh, P.S.C. & Wong, K.T (2014). Discerning Beginning Teachers’ Conceptions Of Competence Through A Phenomenographic Investigation. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education Vol. 4, No. 1, June 2014, 40-47. 10. Ikhsan Othman, Norila Md Salleh & Zaini Abdullah (2014). Pencapaian Dalam Kursus-kursus Profesional Pendidikan Sebagai Peramal Pencapaian Dalam Program Latihan Mengajar Guru Pelatih. Sultan Idris Education University Research Grant: 2014-0094-106-01 (Not Published). 11. M Jaya Adi Putra, Neni Hermita & Wahyu Sopandi. (2014). Analyzing primary teachers’ critical thinking in science lesson. In Proceeding 6th International Conference on Teacher Education: The Standardardization of Teacher Education – Asian Qualification Framework (pp. 161-173). Bandung: Universiti Pendidikan Indonesia. 12. Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Malaysia University Technology Publisher. 13. Mohd Hasani Dali & Ulaganathan Shanmugam. (2005). The problems and the needs of beginning teachers in Malaysia: A case study. In Proceeding JPPG Education Conference: Education for Sustainable Development (pp. 451-463). Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia. 14. Nabilah Abdullah & Nurshamsida Md Shamsuddin. (2011). Cabaran dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Sains di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia. Jurnal Penyeldikan Pendidikan, 12, 87-101. 15. Norila Md Salleh & Ikhsan Othman (2016). Collaboration Between School and Teacher Training Institution in Training Future Teachers. Proceeding International Conference on Language, Education and Civilaization (LECIC) 2016. 16. Norila Md Salleh & Ikhsan Othman (2015). Kesediaan Profesionalisme Guru Pelatih Semasa Praktikum. Sultan Idris Education University Research Grant: 2014-0075-107-01 (Not Published). 17. Norila Md Salleh (2006). Penilaian Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Pendidikan Guru. Prosiding International Conference on Measurement & Evaluation in Education (ICMEE). Malaysia University Science. Page 129-140. 18. Sazwani Suhaimi, Noor Shah Saad & Sazelli Abd Ghani. (2011). Students’ perception towards Mathematics teachers’ communication behaviour. Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 1(1), 59-69. 19. Wiseman, D.C. (1999).. Research Srategies for Education. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.