Performer as narrator : the second movement of Franz Schuberts piano sonata in a major D959

Tham Horng Kent,

Abstract

This paper investigates how a performer might engage with the construction of narrative experiences in and through the performance of the Second Movement of Schubert’s Piano Sonata in A Major, D959. The investigation is based on the understanding of the role of the performer as narrator in the performance of early nineteenth-century piano music in general and Schubert’s Piano Sonata in A Major, D959, in particular. In addition to considering aspects of the musical context in Schubert’s own time, this article will shed light on a ‘paradigm shift’ between what Lawrence Zbikowski termed ‘static form’ and ‘dynamic form’. The traditional large-scale form, such as sonata-form, represents the ‘static form’ which consists of balanced structure built from regular sub-units with clear harmonic connections between each other. The ‘dynamic form’ was conceived as ‘form as process’ where the emphasis was given to a performer in defining the musical structure throughout a piece. This creative role of a performer in giving shape to music suggests the idea of narration and the Second Movement of Schubert’s Piano Sonata in A Major, D959, presents an interesting example for musical narration in early Romantic music. There appears to be no consensus as to a ‘stylistically correct’ rendition of Schubert’s Piano Sonata in A Major, D959, and it possesses some unique musical features, which invite performers and researchers to conduct an investigation of the sonata.

References

1. Agawu, K. (2009). Music as discourse: Semiotic adventures in romantic music. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2. Brendel, A. (2007). Alfred Brendel on music: His collected essays. London: JR Books. 3. Byrne Bodley, L. & Horton, J. (Eds) (2016). Schubert’s late music: History, theory, style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 4. Cone, E. T. (1974). The composer’s voice. California: University of California Press. 5. Gibbs, C. H. (Ed) (1997). The Cambridge companion to Schubert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 6. Hanson, A. M. (1985). Musical life in Biedermeier Vienna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7. Hatten, R. S. (2004). Interpreting musical gestures, topics, and tropes: Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 8. Irving, J. (2002). The invention of tradition. In Samson, J. (Ed), The Cambridge history of nineteenth-century music (pp. 178-212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 9. Kinderman, W. (1997). Schubert’s piano music: Probing the human condition. In Gibbs, C. H. (Ed), The Cambridge companion to Schubert (pp. 155-173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10. Lawson, C. & Stowell, R. Eds. (2012). The Cambridge history of musical performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 11. Litschauer, W. (Ed) (1996). Franz Schubert: Neue ausgabe sämtlicher werke, werke für klavier zu zwei händen band 3 klaviersonaten. Kassel: Bärenreiter-Verlag. 12. McClary, S. (2007). Narrative agendas in “absolute” music: Identity and difference in Brahms’s Third Symphony. In McClary, S., Reading music: Selected essays (pp. 65- 83). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited. 13. Montgomery, D. (2003). Franz Schubert’s music in performance: Compositional ideals, notational intent, historical realities, pedagogical foundations. New York, NY: Pendragon Press. 14. Montgomery, D. (1997). Modern Schubert interpretation in the light of the pedagogical sources of his day. Early Music, 25, 100-118. 15. Pace, I. (2012). Instrumental performance in the nineteenth century. In Lawson, C. and Stowell, R. (Eds), The Cambridge history of musical performance (pp. 643-695). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 16. Pleasants, H. Trans. & Ed. (1965). Schumann on music: A selection from the writings. New York, NY: Dover Publications. 17. Rink, J. (2015). The (f)utility of performance analysis. In Doğantan-Dack, M. (Ed), Artistic practice as research in music: Theory, criticism, practice (pp. 127-148). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited. 18. Rink, J. (2001). Translating musical meaning: The nineteenth-century performer as narrator. In Cook, N. and Everist, M. (Eds), Rethinking music (pp. 217-239). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 19. Rosen, C. (2003). Schubert and the example of Mozart. In Newbould, B. (Ed), Schubert the progressive: History, performance practice, analysis (pp. 1-20). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited. 20. Schmalfeldt, J. (2011). In the process of becoming: Analytical and philosophical perspectives on form in early nineteenth-century music. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 21. Seaton, D. (2009). Narrativity and the performance of Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata. In Bergé, P. (Ed), Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata: Perspectives of analysis and performance (pp.273-292). Leuven: Peeters. 22. Zbikowski, L. M. (2002). Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory and analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.