Abdul Halim Abdullah, Johari Surif, Nor Hasniza Ibrahim, Marlina Ali, & Mohd

Hilmi Hamzah. (2014). The Development of MyGSP: An Online Resource for

Teaching Mathematics Based on Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP). Asian Social

Science, 10(22),227-240. doi: 1 0.5539/ass.v1 On22p227

 

Abu-Hamour, B., & Al-Hmouz, H. (2013). A Study of Gifted High, Moderate, and

Low Achievers in Their Personal Characteristics and Attitudes Toward School

and Teachers. International Journal ofSpecial Education, 28(3),5-15.

 

Abu-Obaidah, A., Ab Rahim Bakar, Rohana Hamzah, & Soaib Asmiran. (2012).

Teachers ' ICT Skills and ICT Integration in the Classroom: The Case of

Vocational and Technical Teachers in Malaysia. Scientific Research,

3(December), 70-76. doi: l0.4236/ce.2012.38bOI6

 

Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, Kamariah Abu Bakar, & Aida

Suraya Mohd Yunus, (2008). A Comparison Of Malaysian Secondary Students

Perceived Ease Of Use And Usefulness Of Dynamic Mathematical Software.

International Journal of Education And Information Technologies, 2(3), 194-

201.

 

Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, Kamariah Abu Bakar, & Wong,

S. L. (2014). Adoption of Wxmaxima Software in the Classroom: Effect on

Students ' Motivation and Learning of Mathematics. Malaysian Journal of

Mathematical Science, 8(2), 311-323.

 

AI-A'a1i, M. (2008). A Study of Mathematics Web-Based Learning in Schools.

American Journal ofApplied Sciences. doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2008.1506.l517

 

Alemu, B. M. (2010). Active Learning Approaches in Mathematics Education At

Universities in Oromia , Ethiopia. University Of South Africa.

 

Andy, F. (2009). Discovering Statistic Using SPSS (Third Edit.). Singapore: Sage

Publications.

 

Anthony, G. (1996). Active Learning in a Constructivist Framework. Educational

Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 349-369. doi:10.1007IBF00369153

 

Azura Ishak, Zakaria Kasa, Mohd Hasan Selamat, & Bahaman Abu Samah. (2009).

Perbandingan Pengajaran Berasaskan Multimedia dan Tradisional ke Atas

Pencapaian . Matematik dan Sikap Matematik di Kalangan Pelajar Berisiko.

Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat & Multimedia, 5, 79-89.

 

Budai, L. (2013). Improving Problem-Solving Skills with the Help of Plane-Space.

CEPS Journal, 3, 79-99.

 

Carpenter, T., & Lehrer, R. (1999).- Teaching And Learning Mathematics With

Understanding. In F. Elizabeth & R. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics Classrooms

That Promote Understanding.

 

Challenger, M. (2009). From Triangles To A Concept: A Phenomenographic Study Of

A-Level Students' Development Of The Concept Of Trigonometry. University of

Warwick.

 

Chu, H. C. (2014). Potential Negative Effects of Mobile Learning on Students'

Learning Achievement and Cognitive Load - A Format Assessment

Perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 17, 332-344.

 

Chua, Y: P. (2014). Asas· Statistik Penyelidikan (Edisi Keti.). ShahAlam: McGrawHill

Education (M) Sdn Bhd.

 

Cohen, J. (1988) .. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates (Vol. 2nd). doi: 10.1234112345678

 

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design Qualitative, Quantitative. and Mixed

Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method

Approaches (3rd Editio.). California: Sage Publications.

 

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing And Conducting Mixed Method

Research (2nd Editio.). California: Sage Publications.

 

Danks, S. (2011). The ADDIE Model: Designing, Evaluating Instructional Coach

Effectiveness. ASQ Primary and Secondary Education Brief, 4(5), 1-6.

 

Demir, I., Kilic, S., & Depren, O. (2009). Factors Affecting Turkish Students'

Achievement In Mathematics. US-China Education Review, 6(6), 47-53.

 

Demir, O. (2012). Students' Concept Development And Understanding of Sine And

Cosine Functions. Universiteit van Amsterdam. Retrieved from

http://www.science.uva.nl/onderwijs/thesis/centraallfiles/fl07257570.pdf

 

Dikovic, L. (2009). Applications Geogebra Into Teaching Some Topics of

Mathematics at The College Level. Computer Science and Information Systems,

6, 191-203. doi:10.2298/CSIS0902191D

 

Drost, E. a. (2004). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education

Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105-123.

 

Effandi Zakaria, & Lee, L. S. (2012). Teachers' Perceptions Toward the Use of

GeoGebra in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Journal of

Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 253-257.

 

Escuder, A., & Furner, J. (2011). The Impact of Geogebra in Math Teacher's

Professional Development. In International Conference on Technologies in

" Collegiate Mathematics (pp. 76-84). Norfolk, USA: Department of Mathematics

"" :" :" and Statistics Old Dominion University.

 

Eu, L K. (2002). Impact Of Geometer's Sketchpad On Students Achievement In

Graph Functions, 1.

 

"Garcia, M. del M., & Romero, 1. (2009). The Influence of New Technologies on the

"Evolution of Learning and Attitudes towards Mathematics in Secondary "

Students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7, 369-

" 395.

 

GeoGebra. (2015). GeoGebra Youtube Channel.

https:/lwww.youtube.comluser/GeoGebraChanne1

Retrieved from

 

GeoGebra Team. (2015). GeoGebra. Retrieved from

https:/lwww.youtube.comluser/GeoGebraChannel/featured

 

George, D., & Paul, M. (2003). SPSSjor Windows Step by Step (11.0 ed.). Retrieved

from

http://wps.ablongman.comlwps/media/objects/385/394732/george4answers.pdf

 

Godson, Y. N. (2008). The Effect oj Graphing Calcukator Embedded Materials On

College Students' Conceptual Understanding and Achievement In A Calculus I

Course. Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in.

 

Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, Ambiguity and Flexibility: A Proceptual

View of Simple Arithmetic. The Journal for Research in Mathematics

Education, 26(2).

 

Gur, H. (2009). Trigonometry Learning. New Horizon in Education, 57(1), 67-80.

 

Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Gamier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, L,

.' .." Stigler, J. W. (2003). Understanding and Improving Mathematics Teaching:

Highlights from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Phi Delta Kappan, 768-775.

 

Hohenwarter, M., Lavicza, Z., & America, N. (2007). Mathematics Teacher

Development With ICT: Towards An International Geogebra Institute,

(November), 49-54.

 

Huett, J. B., Moller, L., Bray, M., Young, J., & Huett, K. C. (2006). The Effects of

ARCS-based Confidence Strategies on Leamer Confidence and Performance in

Distance Education. The Annual Convention of the Association for Educational

Communications and Technology, 1(2001), 11-14.

 

Hutkemri Zulnaidi, & Effandi Zakaria. (2012). The Effect of Using GeoGebra on

Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of High School Mathematics Students.

Asian Social Science, 8(11). doi: 1 0.5539/ass.v8n11 p 1 02

 

Hutkemri Zulnaidi, Effandi Zakaria, & Norazah Mohd Nordin. (2011). Employing

Geogebra in the Teaching of Mathematics: the Teachers' Perspective. Elixir

Psychology, 36, 3483-3485.

 

Ignacio, N. G., Nieto, L. lB., & Barona, E. G. (2006). The affective domain in

Mathematics Learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics

Education, 1, 16-32.

 

International GeoGebra Institute. (2015). Creating a GeoGebraBook. Retrieved from

https:llwww.geogebra.org/materiallsimple/idl1497085

 

Janet, D. (2012). Nursing Faculty Motivation To Use High-Fidelity Simulation: An

Application OfKeller'S Arcs Model.

 

Jaworski, B. (2010). Challenge and Support in Undergraduate Mathematics for

Engineers in a Geogebra Medium. MSOR Connections, 10(1).

 

Jenkinson, J. (2009). Measuring the Effectiveness of Educational Technology: what

are we Attempting to Measure? Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 7, 273-280.

doi: 10.230711164231

 

Jong, T. D. (2009). Cognitive Load Theory, Educational Research, And Instructional

Design: Some Food For Thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105-134.

doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-911 0-0

 

Judith, Markus, & GeoGebra Team. (2013). Introduction to Geogebra Version 4.4.

doi: 10.1163/9789004256064 hao introduction

 

Kalsom Saidin, & Lim, C. S. (2013). Mathematics Teachers ' Levels of Use of

Geometer's Sketchpad: Where is the Pinnacle? In National Symposium on

Mathematical Science (Vol. 291, pp. 285-291). doi:l0.1063/1.4801135

 

Kamariah Abu Bakar, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (20 I 0).

Exploring the Effectiveness of Using Geogebra and E-Transformation in

Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Advance Educational Technologies, 19-

23.

 

Kamariah Abu Bakar, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Wong, S. L., & Rohani Ahmad

Tarmizi. (2010). Exploring Secondary School Students' Motivation Using

Technologies in Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Procedia - Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4650-4654. doi: I 0.1 0 16/j.sbspro.20 1 0.03.744

 

Karppinen, P. (2005). Meaningful Learning with Digital and Online Videos. AACE

Journal Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 13, 233-

250. Retrieved from http://editlib.org/p/6021

 

Kasmawati Che Osman. (2006). Meninjau Penggunaan Geometer Sketch Pad (GSP)

di Kalangan Guru Matematik Sekolah Menengah Pulau Pinang. Universiti Sains

Malaysia.

 

Kee, K. L. (2009). Use of Geometer's Sketchpad in Teaching "Plan & Elevation." In

Third International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 1-

7). Retrieved from http://www.recsam.edu.my/cosmed/cosmed09/

 

Kee, K. L., Aun, T. K., & Sam, L. C. (2008). Use Of Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP) in

Teaching. In Third International Conference on Science and Mathematics

Education(CoSMEd) (pp. 1-7).

 

Keller, J. M. (2000). How To Integrate Learner Motivation Planning Into Lesson

Planning: The ARCS Model Approach. In Integrating Motivation. Cuba.

Retrieved from

http://apps.fischlerschool.nova.edultoolboX/instructionalproducts/edd8124/fallll

12000-Keller-ARCSLessonPlanning.pdf

 

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: Ther ARCS

Approach 2010. Tallahassee: Springer.

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2001). Pembelajaran Secara Konstruktivisme.

Kuala Lumpur.

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (20 11). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah,

Spesijikasi Kurikulum, Matematik Tingkatan 3 (Cetakan Pe.). Putrajaya:

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.

«

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012a). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah,

Spesijikasi Kurikulum, Matematik Tingkatan 4. (Bahagian Pembangunan

Kurikulum, Ed.). Putrajaya.

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012b). Laporan Awa/- Ringkasan EksekutifPelan

Pembngunan Pendidikan 2013-2025.

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2013). Spesijikasi Kurikulum Matematik Tingkatan

5. Putrajaya. Retrieved from

http://apps2.moe.gov.my/kurikulum/v2/downloadlkbsm/mathiSK_ Matematik_ T

g5.PDF

 

Kendal, M., & Stacey, K. (1992). Trigonometry: Comparing Ratio and Unit Circle

Methods, (1973).

 

Kirschner, P. A., Clark, R. E., & Sweller, J. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During

Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist,

Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching.

Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.

 

Lay, Y. F., & Khoo, C. H. (2013). Pengenalan Kepada Pendekatan KuantitatifDalam

Penyelidikan Pendidikan (Cetakan Ke.). Kota Kinabalu: Penerbit Universiti

Malaysia Sabah.

 

Lee, T. T. (2013). Pembinaan dan Keberkesanan Modul Multimedia Interaktif

Dengan Agen Pedagogi dalam Pembelajaran Elektrokimia. Universiti

Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Leong, K. E. (2013). Impact Of Geometer's Sketchpad On Students Achievement In

Graph Functions. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology,

1(2).

 

Lim, S. H., Koo, S. H., Chong, G. C., Pumadevi, S., & Samadi Hashim. (2011).

Matematik Tingkatan 4. Kuala Lumpur: Darul Fikir.

 

Lisa, A. . M. W. (2012). The Motivational Effects of Using Mobile Devices in

Mathematics Classrooms by Students with Exceptionalities. University of

Ontario Institute of Technology.

 

Lu, Y. A. (2008). Linking Geometry and Algebra: A multiple-case study of UpperSecondary

mathematics teachers 'conceptions and practices of GeoGebra in

England and Taiwan. University of Cambridge.

 

Mainali, B. R., & Key, M. B. (2014). Using dynamic geometry software GeoGebra in

developing countries: A case study of impressions of mathematics teachers in

Nepal. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1-16.

Retrieved from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.ukljournal/mainali.pdf

 

Mansureh, K. (2008). Effects Of A Computer Game On Mathematics Achievement

And Class Motivation: An Experimental Study. University of Central Florida.

 

Mardziah Hayati Abdullah. (2001). What Are the Benefits of Self-Directed. ERIC

DIGEST. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED459458.pdf

 

Maria, 1. R. (2004). Understanding The Low Mathematics Achievement Of Chilean

Students: A Cross-National Analysis Using Timss Data. Boston College.

 

Marzita Puteh, & Rohaidah Masri. (2006). Geometer Sketchpad:Penggunaannya

dalam Pembelajaran Matematik Tambahan. Menanggapi Keberkesanan Dan

Perubahan, 101-115.

 

Melike, Y. (2014). Learning of Trigonometry: An Examination Of Pre-Service

Secondary Mathematics Teachers' Trigonometric Ratios Schema. Purdue

University.

 

MHEonline.com. (2015). Sketchpad Pricing and Purchasing. Me Graw Hill.

Retrieved from http://www.keycurricu1um.com/products/sketchpadithegeometers-

sketchpad-pricing-and-purchasing

 

Mislina Atan. (2010). A Study Of Students' Perception Of Mobile Learning In

Probability Lessons. Multimedia University Malaysia.

 

Mohd Zamri Abdullah. (2012). Kesan Penggunaan Perisian Geogebra Ke Atas

Motivasi dan Pencapaian Pelajar. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Moore, K. C. (2012). Coherence, Quantitative Reasoning, and the Trigonometry of

Students. Quantitative Reasoning and Mathematical Modeling, 75-92. Retrieved

from www.uwyo.edulwisdome/_files/documents/moore.pdf

 

Murat, A. (2013). Technology Integration In The Mathematics Classroom And The

I[atih Project. University of Maryland.

 

Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting LongTerm

Growth In Students' Mathematics Achievement: The Unique

Contributions Of Motivation And Cognitive Strategies. Child Development,

84(0), 1475-1490. doi:10.1111/cdev.12036

 

Nan, C. i. (2013). Influence of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Students'

Levels of Learning Trigonometry and on Their Attitudes Towards Mathematics.

Hacettepe University Journal ofEducation, 28(3), 219-232.

 

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Six Principles for School

Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved from

http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Math_Standards/12752_exec_pssm.pdf

 

Noor Hisham Jalani, & Lai, C. S. (2012). Beban Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran

Berasaskan Masalah. Proceedings of 2012 World Congress, (1980), 26-36.

Retrieved from www.academia.edu

 

Noor Shah Saad, & Sazelli Abdul Ghani. (2010). Teaching Mathematics in Secondary

School: Theories and Practices (Cetakan Ke.). Tanjung Malim: Universiti

Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Nor A'idah Johari, Rohaiza Ramli, Lee, O. C., & Norliah Ahmat. (2010). The Effect

of GSP on Students' Understanding in The Graphs of Trigonometric Functions.

In Fifteenth Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics. Kuala Lumpur:

Mathematics and Technology, LLC PO Box 11143, Blacksburg, VA 24062-

1143, USA.

 

Nor'ain Mohd Tajudin, (2008). Effects of Using Graphic Calculators in the Teaching

and Learning of Mathematics on Students' Performance and Metacognitive

Awareness. University Putra Malaysia.

 

Nor' Ain Mohd Tajudin. (2013). Graphing Calculator and Geometers' Sketchpad in

Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Journal ofArts and Humanities (JAH),

2(December 2013),53-66.

 

Noraini Idris. (2009). Enhancing Students' Understanding in Calculus Trough

Writing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 36-

55. Retrieved from

http://search.ebscohost.comllogin.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=43692634&si

te=ehost-live

 

Norasmah Othman, & Hariyaty Ab Wahid. (2006). Ciri-ciri keusahawanan dan gaya

pemikira. Jurnal Pengurusan Dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 16, 160.

doi: 10.1017ICB0978 1 1 07415324.004

 

Norazah Nordin, Effandi Zakaria, Nik Rahimah Nik Mohamed, & Mohamaed Amin

Embi. (2010). Pedagogical Usability of the Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP) Digital

Module in the Mathematics Teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Educational

Technology TOJET, 9, 113-117. Retrieved from

http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERlCWebPortal/contentdelivery/servletiERlCServlet?ac

cno=EJ908077\nhttp://www.eric.ed.govIERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ90807

7

 

Nyambane, C. O. (2014). Factors Influencing ICT Integration in Teaching- A

literature Review. International Journal ofEducation and Research, 2(3), 1-18.

 

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/pisa

 

Orhun, N. (2001). Student's Mistakes and Misconceptions. In Proceedings of the

International Conference New Ideas in Mathematics Education (pp. 208-211).

Palm Cove, Australia. Retrieved from http://math.unipa.it/??grimlAOrhun.PDF

 

Othman Lebar. (2014). Penyelidikan Kualitatif: Pengenalan Kepada Teori dan

Metode (Cetakan Ke.). Tanjung Ma1im: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan

Idris.

 

Othman Talib. (2013). Asas Penulisan Tesis Penyelidikan & Statistik (Cetakan Pe.).

Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Peter, D. (1994). Courseware Evaluation Form. Retrieved from

http://www.csudh.edulsoe/ged535/CEF .html

 

Praveen, S., & Leong, K. E. (2013). Effectiveness of Using Geogebra on Students'

Understanding in Learning Circles. The Malaysian Online Journal of

Educational Technology, 1(4),1-11.

 

Radakovic, A. & N. (2012). Teaching probability by using geogebra dynamic tool and

implemanting critical thinking skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

46, 46(Galotti 1989),4943-4947. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.364

 

Rahimi Md Saad, Noraini Idris, Loh, S. C., Ahmad Zabidi Abdul Razak;·.&

Norjoharuddeen Mohd Nor. (2007). Evaluation of Courseware forTeaching and

Learning of Form One Mathematics and Science. Malaysian Education Deans' ..

Council, 1 (December 2007), 47-56. Retrieved from.

http://medc.com.my/medc/journals/MEDCeJOURNAL.pdf#page;=Sl

 

Reiner, C. M., Bothell, T. W., & Sudweeks, R. R. (2002). How to Prepare Effective

Essay Questions: Guidelines for University Faculty. Brigham. Retrieved from

http://www.uwgb.eduloiraiteachlearnlbettertests/betteressays.pdf

 

Reis, Z. A. (2010). Computer Supported Mathematics With Geogebra. Procedia -

Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1449-1455.

doi: 10.10 16/j.sbspro.20 1 0.12.348

 

Richard, C. (2015). Zone of Proximal Development. Retrieved from

httpv/www.innovativelearning.com!educational_psychology/development/zoneof-

proximal-development.html

 

Rincon, L. F. (2009). Designing Dynamic and Interactive Applications Using

Geogebra Software. Kean University.

 

Rio, S. S. (2007). Design Of Instructional Materials For Teaching And Learning

Purposes: Theory Into Practice. Malaysian Education Deans' Council Journal,

1 (December), 97-110. Retrieved from

http://web.usm.my/educationlMEDCNol1l10- DESIGN OF INSTRUCTIONAL

MATERIALS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING.pdf

 

Royati Abdul Saha, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (2010).

The Effects of GeoGebra on Mathematics Achievement: Enlightening

Coordinate Geometry Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, "8; .

686-693. doi: 10.l016/j.sbspro.2010.12.095

 

Safani Bari, Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yasin, & Mussidiq Mohd Ramli. (2013). ComputerAssisted

Teaching and Learning among Special Education Teachers. Asian

Social Science, 9(16),132-147. doi:l0.5539/ass.v9nI6p87

 

Samuelsson, J. (2006). ICT as a Change Agent of Mathematics Teaching in Swedish

Secondary School. Education and Information Technologies, 11(1), 71-81.

doi: 10.1007/s10639-005-5713-5

 

Scher, D. (1995). Lifting the Curtain: The Evolution of The Geometer's Sketchpad

1,10(1),42-48.

 

Shafer, K. G. (2008). Learning to Teach With Technology Through an Apprenticeship

ModeL Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 8(1), 27-44.

 

Sharples, M., Sanchez, 1. A., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile

Learning :Small devices , Big issues. In Technology Enhanced Learning:

Principles and Product (pp. 1-19). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

 

Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A Theory of Learning for the Mobile

Age.

 

Sherman, M. (2011). An Examination Of The Role OfTechnological Tools In Relation

To The Cognitive Demand Of Mathematical Tasks In Secondary Classrooms.

University of Pittsburgh.

 

Simin, G., Ahmad Zabidi Abd Razak, Muhamad Faizal A. Ghani, Ng, Y. R., Yao, M.,

& Zhang, T. (2013). leT Integration In Education: Incorporation for Teaching &

Learning Improvement. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational

Technology, 2(2).

 

Simsek, A. (2014). Interview with John M . Keller on Motivational Design of

Instruction, 5(1), 90-95.

 

Singapore MOE. (2013). 0- & N(A)-Level Mathematics Teaching and Learning .

Syllabus.

 

Soon, T. & F., & Fook, T. B. (2005). The Effects of Geometer's Sketchpad and

Graphic Calculator in the Malaysian Mathematics Classroom Malaysia Online

Journal ofInstructional Technology 2, 2(2), 82-96.

 

Spector, J. M. (2013). Trends and Research Issues in Educational Technology. The

Malaysian Online Journal ofEducational Technology, 1(3), 1-9.

 

Stekroth, J. J. (2007). Technology-Enhanced Mathematics Instruction: Effects Of

Visualization On Student Understanding Of Trigonometry. University Of

Virginia.

 

Stuyf, R. R. Van Der. (2002). Scaffolding as a· Teaching Strategy. In Adolescent

Learning and Development. Retrieved fromcondor.admin.ccny.cuny.edu/...Nan

Der Stuyf Paper.doc ..

 

Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides,· G. J.' (2007). Learning Mathematics with

Understanding: A Critical Consideration' of the Learning Principle in the

Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The Montana Mathematics

Enthusiast, 4(1), 103-114.

 

Swan, K. (2005). A Constructivist Model for Thinking About Learning Online.

Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities, 13 - 31.

doi: 1 0.3998/jsais.11880084.000 1.1 04

 

Sweller, J., Merrienboer, J.. J., & Paas, G. W.. F. (1998). Cognitive Architecture

And Instructional Design. Educational Physchology Review, 10(3),251-296.

 

Tella, A. (2007). The Impact of Motivation on Student's Academic Achievement

and Learning Outcomes in Mathematics among Secondary School Students in

Nigeria. Learning, 3, 149-156.

 

Thompson, P. W. (2008). Conceptual Analysis Of Mathematical Ideas: Some

Spadework At The Foundation Of Mathematics Education. In Annual Meeting of

the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1,

pp. 31-49). Retrieved from http://patthompson.

net/PDFversions/2008ConceptuaIAnaiysis.pdf

 

Ting, S. H. (2013). The Use ofGeoGebra Software Integrated In Teaching Circle III

Topic On Form Four Student. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Tunku Badariah Tunku Ahmad. (2014). Between School Factors and Teacher

Factors: What Inhibits Malaysian Science Teachers From Using ICT? The

Malaysian Online Journal ofEducational Technology, 2(1), 1-10.

 

Unit Peperiksaan SMK Felcra Bukit Kepong. (2:015). Analisis Peperiksaan. Muar.

 

Verenikina, 1. (2003). Understanding Scaffolding and the ZPD in Educational

Research. In AARE-NZARE Conference. Retrieved from

http://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/3 811

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction Between Learning and Development. Cambridge:

Harvard Unoversity Press.

 

Weber, K. (2005)?? Students ' Understanding of Trigonometric Functions.

Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3),91-112.

 

Weber, K. (2008). Teaching' Trigonometric Functions: Lessons Learned from

Research. Connecting Research To Teaching, 102(2).

 

William, W., & Stephen, G. 1. (2005). Research Methods in Education (Eight Edit.).

Boston: Pearson.

 

Yusha'u, M. A. (2013). Difficult Topics in Junior Secondary School Mathematics:

Practical Aspect of Teaching and Learning Trigonometry. SCientific Journal of

Pure and Applied Science, 2, 161-174.

 

Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The Effect of Dynamic Mathematics

Software Geogebra on Student Achievement in Teaching of Trigonometry.

Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 183-187.

doi: 10.1 016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038

 

Zhu, Y. aN., & Leung, F. K. S. (2011). Motivation and Achievement: Is There an

East Asian. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5),

1189-1213.