Abdul Halim Abdullah, Johari Surif, Nor Hasniza Ibrahim, Marlina Ali, & Mohd
Hilmi Hamzah. (2014). The Development of MyGSP: An Online Resource for
Teaching Mathematics Based on Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP). Asian Social
Science, 10(22),227-240. doi: 1 0.5539/ass.v1 On22p227
Abu-Hamour, B., & Al-Hmouz, H. (2013). A Study of Gifted High, Moderate, and
Low Achievers in Their Personal Characteristics and Attitudes Toward School
and Teachers. International Journal ofSpecial Education, 28(3),5-15.
Abu-Obaidah, A., Ab Rahim Bakar, Rohana Hamzah, & Soaib Asmiran. (2012).
Teachers ' ICT Skills and ICT Integration in the Classroom: The Case of
Vocational and Technical Teachers in Malaysia. Scientific Research,
3(December), 70-76. doi: l0.4236/ce.2012.38bOI6
Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, Kamariah Abu Bakar, & Aida
Suraya Mohd Yunus, (2008). A Comparison Of Malaysian Secondary Students
Perceived Ease Of Use And Usefulness Of Dynamic Mathematical Software.
International Journal of Education And Information Technologies, 2(3), 194-
201.
Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, Kamariah Abu Bakar, & Wong,
S. L. (2014). Adoption of Wxmaxima Software in the Classroom: Effect on
Students ' Motivation and Learning of Mathematics. Malaysian Journal of
Mathematical Science, 8(2), 311-323.
AI-A'a1i, M. (2008). A Study of Mathematics Web-Based Learning in Schools.
American Journal ofApplied Sciences. doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2008.1506.l517
Alemu, B. M. (2010). Active Learning Approaches in Mathematics Education At
Universities in Oromia , Ethiopia. University Of South Africa.
Andy, F. (2009). Discovering Statistic Using SPSS (Third Edit.). Singapore: Sage
Publications.
Anthony, G. (1996). Active Learning in a Constructivist Framework. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 349-369. doi:10.1007IBF00369153
Azura Ishak, Zakaria Kasa, Mohd Hasan Selamat, & Bahaman Abu Samah. (2009).
Perbandingan Pengajaran Berasaskan Multimedia dan Tradisional ke Atas
Pencapaian . Matematik dan Sikap Matematik di Kalangan Pelajar Berisiko.
Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat & Multimedia, 5, 79-89.
Budai, L. (2013). Improving Problem-Solving Skills with the Help of Plane-Space.
CEPS Journal, 3, 79-99.
Carpenter, T., & Lehrer, R. (1999).- Teaching And Learning Mathematics With
Understanding. In F. Elizabeth & R. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics Classrooms
That Promote Understanding.
Challenger, M. (2009). From Triangles To A Concept: A Phenomenographic Study Of
A-Level Students' Development Of The Concept Of Trigonometry. University of
Warwick.
Chu, H. C. (2014). Potential Negative Effects of Mobile Learning on Students'
Learning Achievement and Cognitive Load - A Format Assessment
Perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 17, 332-344.
Chua, Y: P. (2014). Asas· Statistik Penyelidikan (Edisi Keti.). ShahAlam: McGrawHill
Education (M) Sdn Bhd.
Cohen, J. (1988) .. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates (Vol. 2nd). doi: 10.1234112345678
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design Qualitative, Quantitative. and Mixed
Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method
Approaches (3rd Editio.). California: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing And Conducting Mixed Method
Research (2nd Editio.). California: Sage Publications.
Danks, S. (2011). The ADDIE Model: Designing, Evaluating Instructional Coach
Effectiveness. ASQ Primary and Secondary Education Brief, 4(5), 1-6.
Demir, I., Kilic, S., & Depren, O. (2009). Factors Affecting Turkish Students'
Achievement In Mathematics. US-China Education Review, 6(6), 47-53.
Demir, O. (2012). Students' Concept Development And Understanding of Sine And
Cosine Functions. Universiteit van Amsterdam. Retrieved from
http://www.science.uva.nl/onderwijs/thesis/centraallfiles/fl07257570.pdf
Dikovic, L. (2009). Applications Geogebra Into Teaching Some Topics of
Mathematics at The College Level. Computer Science and Information Systems,
6, 191-203. doi:10.2298/CSIS0902191D
Drost, E. a. (2004). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education
Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105-123.
Effandi Zakaria, & Lee, L. S. (2012). Teachers' Perceptions Toward the Use of
GeoGebra in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Journal of
Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 253-257.
Escuder, A., & Furner, J. (2011). The Impact of Geogebra in Math Teacher's
Professional Development. In International Conference on Technologies in
" Collegiate Mathematics (pp. 76-84). Norfolk, USA: Department of Mathematics
"" :" :" and Statistics Old Dominion University.
Eu, L K. (2002). Impact Of Geometer's Sketchpad On Students Achievement In
Graph Functions, 1.
"Garcia, M. del M., & Romero, 1. (2009). The Influence of New Technologies on the
"Evolution of Learning and Attitudes towards Mathematics in Secondary "
Students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7, 369-
" 395.
GeoGebra. (2015). GeoGebra Youtube Channel.
https:/lwww.youtube.comluser/GeoGebraChanne1
Retrieved from
GeoGebra Team. (2015). GeoGebra. Retrieved from
https:/lwww.youtube.comluser/GeoGebraChannel/featured
George, D., & Paul, M. (2003). SPSSjor Windows Step by Step (11.0 ed.). Retrieved
from
http://wps.ablongman.comlwps/media/objects/385/394732/george4answers.pdf
Godson, Y. N. (2008). The Effect oj Graphing Calcukator Embedded Materials On
College Students' Conceptual Understanding and Achievement In A Calculus I
Course. Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in.
Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, Ambiguity and Flexibility: A Proceptual
View of Simple Arithmetic. The Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 26(2).
Gur, H. (2009). Trigonometry Learning. New Horizon in Education, 57(1), 67-80.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Gamier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, L,
.' .." Stigler, J. W. (2003). Understanding and Improving Mathematics Teaching:
Highlights from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Phi Delta Kappan, 768-775.
Hohenwarter, M., Lavicza, Z., & America, N. (2007). Mathematics Teacher
Development With ICT: Towards An International Geogebra Institute,
(November), 49-54.
Huett, J. B., Moller, L., Bray, M., Young, J., & Huett, K. C. (2006). The Effects of
ARCS-based Confidence Strategies on Leamer Confidence and Performance in
Distance Education. The Annual Convention of the Association for Educational
Communications and Technology, 1(2001), 11-14.
Hutkemri Zulnaidi, & Effandi Zakaria. (2012). The Effect of Using GeoGebra on
Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of High School Mathematics Students.
Asian Social Science, 8(11). doi: 1 0.5539/ass.v8n11 p 1 02
Hutkemri Zulnaidi, Effandi Zakaria, & Norazah Mohd Nordin. (2011). Employing
Geogebra in the Teaching of Mathematics: the Teachers' Perspective. Elixir
Psychology, 36, 3483-3485.
Ignacio, N. G., Nieto, L. lB., & Barona, E. G. (2006). The affective domain in
Mathematics Learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics
Education, 1, 16-32.
International GeoGebra Institute. (2015). Creating a GeoGebraBook. Retrieved from
https:llwww.geogebra.org/materiallsimple/idl1497085
Janet, D. (2012). Nursing Faculty Motivation To Use High-Fidelity Simulation: An
Application OfKeller'S Arcs Model.
Jaworski, B. (2010). Challenge and Support in Undergraduate Mathematics for
Engineers in a Geogebra Medium. MSOR Connections, 10(1).
Jenkinson, J. (2009). Measuring the Effectiveness of Educational Technology: what
are we Attempting to Measure? Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 7, 273-280.
doi: 10.230711164231
Jong, T. D. (2009). Cognitive Load Theory, Educational Research, And Instructional
Design: Some Food For Thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105-134.
doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-911 0-0
Judith, Markus, & GeoGebra Team. (2013). Introduction to Geogebra Version 4.4.
doi: 10.1163/9789004256064 hao introduction
Kalsom Saidin, & Lim, C. S. (2013). Mathematics Teachers ' Levels of Use of
Geometer's Sketchpad: Where is the Pinnacle? In National Symposium on
Mathematical Science (Vol. 291, pp. 285-291). doi:l0.1063/1.4801135
Kamariah Abu Bakar, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (20 I 0).
Exploring the Effectiveness of Using Geogebra and E-Transformation in
Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Advance Educational Technologies, 19-
23.
Kamariah Abu Bakar, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Wong, S. L., & Rohani Ahmad
Tarmizi. (2010). Exploring Secondary School Students' Motivation Using
Technologies in Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4650-4654. doi: I 0.1 0 16/j.sbspro.20 1 0.03.744
Karppinen, P. (2005). Meaningful Learning with Digital and Online Videos. AACE
Journal Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 13, 233-
250. Retrieved from http://editlib.org/p/6021
Kasmawati Che Osman. (2006). Meninjau Penggunaan Geometer Sketch Pad (GSP)
di Kalangan Guru Matematik Sekolah Menengah Pulau Pinang. Universiti Sains
Malaysia.
Kee, K. L. (2009). Use of Geometer's Sketchpad in Teaching "Plan & Elevation." In
Third International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 1-
7). Retrieved from http://www.recsam.edu.my/cosmed/cosmed09/
Kee, K. L., Aun, T. K., & Sam, L. C. (2008). Use Of Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP) in
Teaching. In Third International Conference on Science and Mathematics
Education(CoSMEd) (pp. 1-7).
Keller, J. M. (2000). How To Integrate Learner Motivation Planning Into Lesson
Planning: The ARCS Model Approach. In Integrating Motivation. Cuba.
Retrieved from
http://apps.fischlerschool.nova.edultoolboX/instructionalproducts/edd8124/fallll
12000-Keller-ARCSLessonPlanning.pdf
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: Ther ARCS
Approach 2010. Tallahassee: Springer.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2001). Pembelajaran Secara Konstruktivisme.
Kuala Lumpur.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (20 11). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah,
Spesijikasi Kurikulum, Matematik Tingkatan 3 (Cetakan Pe.). Putrajaya:
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
«
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012a). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah,
Spesijikasi Kurikulum, Matematik Tingkatan 4. (Bahagian Pembangunan
Kurikulum, Ed.). Putrajaya.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012b). Laporan Awa/- Ringkasan EksekutifPelan
Pembngunan Pendidikan 2013-2025.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2013). Spesijikasi Kurikulum Matematik Tingkatan
5. Putrajaya. Retrieved from
http://apps2.moe.gov.my/kurikulum/v2/downloadlkbsm/mathiSK_ Matematik_ T
g5.PDF
Kendal, M., & Stacey, K. (1992). Trigonometry: Comparing Ratio and Unit Circle
Methods, (1973).
Kirschner, P. A., Clark, R. E., & Sweller, J. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During
Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist,
Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching.
Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Lay, Y. F., & Khoo, C. H. (2013). Pengenalan Kepada Pendekatan KuantitatifDalam
Penyelidikan Pendidikan (Cetakan Ke.). Kota Kinabalu: Penerbit Universiti
Malaysia Sabah.
Lee, T. T. (2013). Pembinaan dan Keberkesanan Modul Multimedia Interaktif
Dengan Agen Pedagogi dalam Pembelajaran Elektrokimia. Universiti
Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Leong, K. E. (2013). Impact Of Geometer's Sketchpad On Students Achievement In
Graph Functions. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology,
1(2).
Lim, S. H., Koo, S. H., Chong, G. C., Pumadevi, S., & Samadi Hashim. (2011).
Matematik Tingkatan 4. Kuala Lumpur: Darul Fikir.
Lisa, A. . M. W. (2012). The Motivational Effects of Using Mobile Devices in
Mathematics Classrooms by Students with Exceptionalities. University of
Ontario Institute of Technology.
Lu, Y. A. (2008). Linking Geometry and Algebra: A multiple-case study of UpperSecondary
mathematics teachers 'conceptions and practices of GeoGebra in
England and Taiwan. University of Cambridge.
Mainali, B. R., & Key, M. B. (2014). Using dynamic geometry software GeoGebra in
developing countries: A case study of impressions of mathematics teachers in
Nepal. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1-16.
Retrieved from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.ukljournal/mainali.pdf
Mansureh, K. (2008). Effects Of A Computer Game On Mathematics Achievement
And Class Motivation: An Experimental Study. University of Central Florida.
Mardziah Hayati Abdullah. (2001). What Are the Benefits of Self-Directed. ERIC
DIGEST. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED459458.pdf
Maria, 1. R. (2004). Understanding The Low Mathematics Achievement Of Chilean
Students: A Cross-National Analysis Using Timss Data. Boston College.
Marzita Puteh, & Rohaidah Masri. (2006). Geometer Sketchpad:Penggunaannya
dalam Pembelajaran Matematik Tambahan. Menanggapi Keberkesanan Dan
Perubahan, 101-115.
Melike, Y. (2014). Learning of Trigonometry: An Examination Of Pre-Service
Secondary Mathematics Teachers' Trigonometric Ratios Schema. Purdue
University.
MHEonline.com. (2015). Sketchpad Pricing and Purchasing. Me Graw Hill.
Retrieved from http://www.keycurricu1um.com/products/sketchpadithegeometers-
sketchpad-pricing-and-purchasing
Mislina Atan. (2010). A Study Of Students' Perception Of Mobile Learning In
Probability Lessons. Multimedia University Malaysia.
Mohd Zamri Abdullah. (2012). Kesan Penggunaan Perisian Geogebra Ke Atas
Motivasi dan Pencapaian Pelajar. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Moore, K. C. (2012). Coherence, Quantitative Reasoning, and the Trigonometry of
Students. Quantitative Reasoning and Mathematical Modeling, 75-92. Retrieved
from www.uwyo.edulwisdome/_files/documents/moore.pdf
Murat, A. (2013). Technology Integration In The Mathematics Classroom And The
I[atih Project. University of Maryland.
Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting LongTerm
Growth In Students' Mathematics Achievement: The Unique
Contributions Of Motivation And Cognitive Strategies. Child Development,
84(0), 1475-1490. doi:10.1111/cdev.12036
Nan, C. i. (2013). Influence of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Students'
Levels of Learning Trigonometry and on Their Attitudes Towards Mathematics.
Hacettepe University Journal ofEducation, 28(3), 219-232.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Six Principles for School
Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved from
http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Math_Standards/12752_exec_pssm.pdf
Noor Hisham Jalani, & Lai, C. S. (2012). Beban Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran
Berasaskan Masalah. Proceedings of 2012 World Congress, (1980), 26-36.
Retrieved from www.academia.edu
Noor Shah Saad, & Sazelli Abdul Ghani. (2010). Teaching Mathematics in Secondary
School: Theories and Practices (Cetakan Ke.). Tanjung Malim: Universiti
Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Nor A'idah Johari, Rohaiza Ramli, Lee, O. C., & Norliah Ahmat. (2010). The Effect
of GSP on Students' Understanding in The Graphs of Trigonometric Functions.
In Fifteenth Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics. Kuala Lumpur:
Mathematics and Technology, LLC PO Box 11143, Blacksburg, VA 24062-
1143, USA.
Nor'ain Mohd Tajudin, (2008). Effects of Using Graphic Calculators in the Teaching
and Learning of Mathematics on Students' Performance and Metacognitive
Awareness. University Putra Malaysia.
Nor' Ain Mohd Tajudin. (2013). Graphing Calculator and Geometers' Sketchpad in
Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Journal ofArts and Humanities (JAH),
2(December 2013),53-66.
Noraini Idris. (2009). Enhancing Students' Understanding in Calculus Trough
Writing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 36-
55. Retrieved from
http://search.ebscohost.comllogin.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=43692634&si
te=ehost-live
Norasmah Othman, & Hariyaty Ab Wahid. (2006). Ciri-ciri keusahawanan dan gaya
pemikira. Jurnal Pengurusan Dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 16, 160.
doi: 10.1017ICB0978 1 1 07415324.004
Norazah Nordin, Effandi Zakaria, Nik Rahimah Nik Mohamed, & Mohamaed Amin
Embi. (2010). Pedagogical Usability of the Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP) Digital
Module in the Mathematics Teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology TOJET, 9, 113-117. Retrieved from
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERlCWebPortal/contentdelivery/servletiERlCServlet?ac
cno=EJ908077\nhttp://www.eric.ed.govIERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ90807
7
Nyambane, C. O. (2014). Factors Influencing ICT Integration in Teaching- A
literature Review. International Journal ofEducation and Research, 2(3), 1-18.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/pisa
Orhun, N. (2001). Student's Mistakes and Misconceptions. In Proceedings of the
International Conference New Ideas in Mathematics Education (pp. 208-211).
Palm Cove, Australia. Retrieved from http://math.unipa.it/??grimlAOrhun.PDF
Othman Lebar. (2014). Penyelidikan Kualitatif: Pengenalan Kepada Teori dan
Metode (Cetakan Ke.). Tanjung Ma1im: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan
Idris.
Othman Talib. (2013). Asas Penulisan Tesis Penyelidikan & Statistik (Cetakan Pe.).
Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Peter, D. (1994). Courseware Evaluation Form. Retrieved from
http://www.csudh.edulsoe/ged535/CEF .html
Praveen, S., & Leong, K. E. (2013). Effectiveness of Using Geogebra on Students'
Understanding in Learning Circles. The Malaysian Online Journal of
Educational Technology, 1(4),1-11.
Radakovic, A. & N. (2012). Teaching probability by using geogebra dynamic tool and
implemanting critical thinking skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
46, 46(Galotti 1989),4943-4947. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.364
Rahimi Md Saad, Noraini Idris, Loh, S. C., Ahmad Zabidi Abdul Razak;·.&
Norjoharuddeen Mohd Nor. (2007). Evaluation of Courseware forTeaching and
Learning of Form One Mathematics and Science. Malaysian Education Deans' ..
Council, 1 (December 2007), 47-56. Retrieved from.
http://medc.com.my/medc/journals/MEDCeJOURNAL.pdf#page;=Sl
Reiner, C. M., Bothell, T. W., & Sudweeks, R. R. (2002). How to Prepare Effective
Essay Questions: Guidelines for University Faculty. Brigham. Retrieved from
http://www.uwgb.eduloiraiteachlearnlbettertests/betteressays.pdf
Reis, Z. A. (2010). Computer Supported Mathematics With Geogebra. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1449-1455.
doi: 10.10 16/j.sbspro.20 1 0.12.348
Richard, C. (2015). Zone of Proximal Development. Retrieved from
httpv/www.innovativelearning.com!educational_psychology/development/zoneof-
proximal-development.html
Rincon, L. F. (2009). Designing Dynamic and Interactive Applications Using
Geogebra Software. Kean University.
Rio, S. S. (2007). Design Of Instructional Materials For Teaching And Learning
Purposes: Theory Into Practice. Malaysian Education Deans' Council Journal,
1 (December), 97-110. Retrieved from
http://web.usm.my/educationlMEDCNol1l10- DESIGN OF INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIALS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING.pdf
Royati Abdul Saha, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (2010).
The Effects of GeoGebra on Mathematics Achievement: Enlightening
Coordinate Geometry Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, "8; .
686-693. doi: 10.l016/j.sbspro.2010.12.095
Safani Bari, Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yasin, & Mussidiq Mohd Ramli. (2013). ComputerAssisted
Teaching and Learning among Special Education Teachers. Asian
Social Science, 9(16),132-147. doi:l0.5539/ass.v9nI6p87
Samuelsson, J. (2006). ICT as a Change Agent of Mathematics Teaching in Swedish
Secondary School. Education and Information Technologies, 11(1), 71-81.
doi: 10.1007/s10639-005-5713-5
Scher, D. (1995). Lifting the Curtain: The Evolution of The Geometer's Sketchpad
1,10(1),42-48.
Shafer, K. G. (2008). Learning to Teach With Technology Through an Apprenticeship
ModeL Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 8(1), 27-44.
Sharples, M., Sanchez, 1. A., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile
Learning :Small devices , Big issues. In Technology Enhanced Learning:
Principles and Product (pp. 1-19). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A Theory of Learning for the Mobile
Age.
Sherman, M. (2011). An Examination Of The Role OfTechnological Tools In Relation
To The Cognitive Demand Of Mathematical Tasks In Secondary Classrooms.
University of Pittsburgh.
Simin, G., Ahmad Zabidi Abd Razak, Muhamad Faizal A. Ghani, Ng, Y. R., Yao, M.,
& Zhang, T. (2013). leT Integration In Education: Incorporation for Teaching &
Learning Improvement. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational
Technology, 2(2).
Simsek, A. (2014). Interview with John M . Keller on Motivational Design of
Instruction, 5(1), 90-95.
Singapore MOE. (2013). 0- & N(A)-Level Mathematics Teaching and Learning .
Syllabus.
Soon, T. & F., & Fook, T. B. (2005). The Effects of Geometer's Sketchpad and
Graphic Calculator in the Malaysian Mathematics Classroom Malaysia Online
Journal ofInstructional Technology 2, 2(2), 82-96.
Spector, J. M. (2013). Trends and Research Issues in Educational Technology. The
Malaysian Online Journal ofEducational Technology, 1(3), 1-9.
Stekroth, J. J. (2007). Technology-Enhanced Mathematics Instruction: Effects Of
Visualization On Student Understanding Of Trigonometry. University Of
Virginia.
Stuyf, R. R. Van Der. (2002). Scaffolding as a· Teaching Strategy. In Adolescent
Learning and Development. Retrieved fromcondor.admin.ccny.cuny.edu/...Nan
Der Stuyf Paper.doc ..
Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides,· G. J.' (2007). Learning Mathematics with
Understanding: A Critical Consideration' of the Learning Principle in the
Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The Montana Mathematics
Enthusiast, 4(1), 103-114.
Swan, K. (2005). A Constructivist Model for Thinking About Learning Online.
Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities, 13 - 31.
doi: 1 0.3998/jsais.11880084.000 1.1 04
Sweller, J., Merrienboer, J.. J., & Paas, G. W.. F. (1998). Cognitive Architecture
And Instructional Design. Educational Physchology Review, 10(3),251-296.
Tella, A. (2007). The Impact of Motivation on Student's Academic Achievement
and Learning Outcomes in Mathematics among Secondary School Students in
Nigeria. Learning, 3, 149-156.
Thompson, P. W. (2008). Conceptual Analysis Of Mathematical Ideas: Some
Spadework At The Foundation Of Mathematics Education. In Annual Meeting of
the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1,
pp. 31-49). Retrieved from http://patthompson.
net/PDFversions/2008ConceptuaIAnaiysis.pdf
Ting, S. H. (2013). The Use ofGeoGebra Software Integrated In Teaching Circle III
Topic On Form Four Student. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Tunku Badariah Tunku Ahmad. (2014). Between School Factors and Teacher
Factors: What Inhibits Malaysian Science Teachers From Using ICT? The
Malaysian Online Journal ofEducational Technology, 2(1), 1-10.
Unit Peperiksaan SMK Felcra Bukit Kepong. (2:015). Analisis Peperiksaan. Muar.
Verenikina, 1. (2003). Understanding Scaffolding and the ZPD in Educational
Research. In AARE-NZARE Conference. Retrieved from
http://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/3 811
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction Between Learning and Development. Cambridge:
Harvard Unoversity Press.
Weber, K. (2005)?? Students ' Understanding of Trigonometric Functions.
Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3),91-112.
Weber, K. (2008). Teaching' Trigonometric Functions: Lessons Learned from
Research. Connecting Research To Teaching, 102(2).
William, W., & Stephen, G. 1. (2005). Research Methods in Education (Eight Edit.).
Boston: Pearson.
Yusha'u, M. A. (2013). Difficult Topics in Junior Secondary School Mathematics:
Practical Aspect of Teaching and Learning Trigonometry. SCientific Journal of
Pure and Applied Science, 2, 161-174.
Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The Effect of Dynamic Mathematics
Software Geogebra on Student Achievement in Teaching of Trigonometry.
Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 183-187.
doi: 10.1 016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038
Zhu, Y. aN., & Leung, F. K. S. (2011). Motivation and Achievement: Is There an
East Asian. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5),
1189-1213.