|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text : |
| Kajian ini dijalankan untuk mengesan perubahan guna tanah dan litupan bumi di daerah Miri, Sarawak menggunakan pendekatan penderiaan jauh. Perbandingan guna tanah dan litupan bumi pada tahun 2001 hingga 2016 telah dilakukan bagi melihat perubahan guna tanah yang telah berlaku di daerah Miri. Data asas dalam mengesan perubahan guna dan litupan bumi ialah imej satelit Landsat (TM dan OLI-TIRS). Kawasan kajian telah diklasifikasikan kepada enam kategori guna tanah asas iaitu tepu bina, hutan darat, hutan gambut, tanah lapang, kelapa sawit dan air. Hasil perbandingan peta klasifikasi imej satelit Landsat pada tahun 2001 (TM) dan 2016 (OLI-TIRS) menunjukkan bahawa terdapat peningkatan yang ketara kawasan tepu bina dari 4.4% kepada 11.5% dan penanaman kelapa sawit dari 9.8% kepada 43.6% terutamanya di kawasan berhampiran dengan aktiviti pembandaran. Hutan darat mengalami kehilangan keluasan yang serius dari 42% kepada 47% dalam jangkamasa 15 tahun. Kesimpulanya pembangunan dan kemajuan dalam daerah Miri memberi tekanan kepada guna tanah hutan dan pengekalan hutan. |
| References |
1. Campbell, J. B. (1997). Introduction to remote sensing. New York: Guilford Press.
2. Campbell, J.B. (2007). Introduction to remote sensing, Fourth edition,; The Guilford Press: New York, USA.
3. Carlson, T.N. & Azofeifa, S.G.A. (1999). Satellite remote sensing of land use changes in and around San José, Costa Rica. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70, 247–256.
4. Congalton, R. G. & Green, K. (1999). Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: Principles and practices. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
5. Coppin, P., Jonckheere, I., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B. & Lambin, E. (2004). Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(9), 1565−1596.
6. Demers, M. N. (2005). Fundamentals of geographic information systems; New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Dwivedi, R. S., Sreenivas, K. & Ramana, K.V. (2005). Land-use/land-cover change analysis in part of Ethiopia using Landsat Thematic Mapper data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(7), 1285–1287.
8. Fan, F., Weng, Q., & Wang, Y. (2007). Land use land cover change in Guangzhou, China, from 1998 to 2003, based on Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery. Sensors, 7, 1323–1342.
9. Foody, G. M. (1992). On the compensation for change agreement in image classifcation accuracy assessment. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58(10), 1459-1460.
10. Fresco L.O. (1994). Imaginable futures, a contribution to thinking about land use planning (eds Fresco LO, Stroosnijder L, Bouma J, van Keulen H), hlm 1–8. Chichester: JohnWiley and Sons.
11. Guerschman, J.P., Paruelo, J.M., Bela, C.D., Giallorenzi, M.C. & Pacin, F. (2003). Land cover classification in the Argentine Pampas using multi-temporal Landsat TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, 3381–3402.
12. Hansen, A. J., Rasker, R., Maxwell, B., Rotella, J. J., Wright, A. & Langner, U. (2002). Ecology and socioeconomics in the New West: A case study from Greater Yellowstone. Bioscience, 52, 151−162.
13. Hayes, D. J., & Sader, S. A. (2001). Comparison of change-detection techniques for monitoring tropical forest clearing and vegetation regrowth in a time series. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 67(9), 1067−1075.
14. Jantz, C. A., Goetz, S. J., & Shelley, M. A. (2003). Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the land use impacts of policy scenarios in the Baltimore–Washington metropolitan region. Environment and Planning (B), 31(2), 251−271
15. Kennedy, R. E., Townsend, P. A., Gross, J. E., Cohen, W. B., Bolstad, P., & Wang, Y. Q. (2009). Remote sensing change detection tools for natural resource managers: Understanding concepts and tradeoffs in the design of landscape monitoring projects. Remote Sensing Environment, 113, 1382−1396
16. Lambin, E. F., & Strahler, A. H. (1993). Change-vector analysis in multitemporal space: A tool to detect and categorize land-cover change processes using high-temporal resolution satellite data. Remote Sensing Environment, 48, 231−244.
17. Lu, D., Mausel, P., Batistella, M., & Moran, E. (2005). Land-cover binary change detection methods for use in the moist tropical region of the Amazon: a comparative study. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(1), 101–114.
18. Mas, J. F. (1999). Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(1), 139−152.
19. Mas, J.F., Velazquez, A., Gallegos, J. R. D., Saucedo, R. M., Alcantare, C., Bocco, G., Castro, R., Fernandez, T., & Vega, A. P. (2004). Assessing land use/cover changes: a nationwide multidate spatial database for Mexico. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 5, 249–261.
20. McConnell, W., & Moran, E. F. (2001). Meeting in the middle: The challenge of meso-level integration. LUCC Focus 1 Office, Anthropological Center for Training and Research on Global Environmental Change, Indiana University.
21. Mouat, D. A., Mahin, G. G., & Lancaster, J. (1993). Remote sensing techniques in the analysis of change detection. Geocarto International, 2, 39−50.
22. Muhiyuddin, W. M. , Ibrahim, W., & Norhafizah, B. N. (2012). Application of Geographic Information System (GIS) in slope failures: A case study in Paya Terubong, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. Jurnal Perspektif 4(2), 56-66.
23. Muttitanon, W., & Tiıpathi, N. K. (2005). Land use/land cover changes in the coastal zone of Ban Don Bay, Thailand using Landsat 5 TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(11), 2311–2323.
24. Nur Hakimah, A., & Lam Kuok Choy. (2016). Analisis perubahan guna tanah dan litupan bumi di Gombak, Selangor menggunakan data penderiaan jauh. Sains Malaysiana, 45(12), 1869–1877.
25. Parmenter, A. P., Hansen, A., Kennedy, R., Cohen, W., Langner, U., & Lawrence, R. (2003). Land use and land cover change in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: 1975–95. Ecological Applications, 13, 687−703
26. Praveen, K. M., & Jayarama R. S. R. (2013). Analysis of land use/land cover changes using remote sensing data and GIS at an urban area, Tirupati, India. The Scientific World Journal, 1, 1-6. doi:10.1155/2013/268623
27. Prenzel, B. (2004). Remote sensing-based quantification of land-cover and land-use change for planning. Progress in Planning, 61, 281–299.
28. Rhemtulla, J. M., Mladenoff, D. J., & Clayton, M. K. (2007). Regional land-cover conversion in the U.S. upper Midwest: Magnitude of change and limited recovery (1850–1935–1993). Landscape Ecology, 22, 57−75.
29. Roberts, D. A., Batista, G. T., Pereira, J. L. G., Waller, E. K., & Nelson, B.W. (1998). Change identification using multitemporal spectral mixture analysis: application in Eastern Amazonia, In Remote sensing change detection: environmental monitoring methods and applications, Lunetta and Elvidge (Editors), Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, Michigan, hlm. 137–161.
30. Rogan, J., Franklin, J., & Roberts, D. A. (2002). A comparison of methods for monitoring multitemporal vegetation change using Thematic Mapper imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, 143−156.
31. Rogana, J., & Chen, D. (2004). Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change. Progress in Planning, 61, 301–325.
32. Seto, K. C., Woodcock, C. E., Song, C., Huang, X., Lu, J., & Kaufmann, R. K. (2002). Monitoring land use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(10), 1985–2004.
33. Sumayyah Aimi, M. N., & Zullyadini, A. R. (2016). Analisis perubahan gunatanah di Daerah Barat Daya, Pulau Pinang. Geografi, 4(1), 43-55. Diperoleh daripada https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/GetFinalFile.ashx?file=d0e3c901-86ae-4d2e-807c-49b55d8130fb.pdf
34. Ulbricht, K. A., & Heckendorf, W. D. (1998). Satellite images for recognition of landscape and land use changes. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 53, 235–243.
35. United State Geological Survey (USGS) (2016). Data Landsat 2001 dan 2016. Diperoleh daripada http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov
36. Walker, R. (2003). Mapping process to pattern in the landscape change of the Amazonian frontier. Annuals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2), 376−398.
37. Wang, Y., & Moskovits, D. K. (2001). Tracking fragmentation of natural communities and changes in land cover: Applications of Landsat data for conservation in an urban landscape (Chicago Wilderness). Conservation Biology, 15(4), 835−843.
38. Welch, R., Madden, M., & Jordan, T. (2002). Photogrammetric and GIS techniques for the development of vegetation database of mountainous areas: Great Smoky Mountains National Park. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 55, 53−68.
39. Wilkinson, D. W., Parker, R. C., & Evans, D. L. (2008). Change detection techniques for use in a statewide forest inventory program. PE & RS, 74(7), 893−901.
40. Woodcock, C.E., & Ozdogan, M. (2004). Trends in land cover mapping and monitoring. Dlm Gutman, G., Janetos, A.C., Justice, C.O., Moran, E.F., Mustard, J.F., Rindfuss, R.R., Skole, D., Turner II, B.L., Cochrane, M.A. (Eds.), Land Change Science: Observing, monitoring and understanding trajectories of change on the earth’s surface, hlm. 367–377. Springer, New York.
41. Wu, Q., Li, H. Q., Wang, R.S., Paulussen, J., He, H., Wang, M., Wang, B. H., & Wang, Z. (2006). Monitoring and predicting land use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 322–333.
42. Yuan, F., Sawaya, K. E., Loeffelholz, B. C. & Bauer, M. E. (2005). Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) metropolitan areas by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98, 317–328.
43. Zhao, G.X., Lin, G., & Warner, T. (2004). Using ThematicMapper data for change detection and sustainable use of cultivated land: a case study in the Yellow River delta, China. International. Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(13), 2509–2522.
44. Zsuzsanna, D., Bartholy, J., Pongracz, R., & Barcza, Z. (2005). Analysis of land-use/land-cover change in the Carpathian region based on remote sensing techniques. Physics and Chemistry of Earth, 30, 109–115. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |