UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :HB Economic Theory
ISSN :2232-0032
Main Author :Ghuslan Mohamad Iruwan, Mohd Saleh Norman,
Title :The influence of board characteristics on sustainability reporting in selected Malaysian sensitive and non-sensitive industries (IR)
Place of Production :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :2017
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Full Text :
This study seeks to investigate the influence of board characteristics on the sustainability reporting of selected industries listed on Bursa Malaysia. The board of directors is claimed to be the most important person and aspects of corporate governance systems that may influence the company’s decision to disclose more or less their sustainability reporting to the society. This study makes a contribution to research in this area as it highlights whether governance mechanisms are related to an increase the level of sustainability reporting in the annual reports. A sample of 70 listed companies was drawn from the Bursa Malaysia using systematic random sampling method. Data were collected from annual reports from 2012 and 2013. Analysis shows that only two variables influence the level of sustainability reporting, namely board size and proportion of independence of directors, Dual leadership and type of industry insignificantly influence the level of sustainability reporting disclosure. This study also found that sustainability reporting is likely to be influenced by profitability and firm growth.

References
1. Abdullah, S.N., Mohamad, N.R., & Mokhtar, M.Z. (2011). Board independence, ownership and CSR of Malaysian large firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(3), 341-357. 2. Adams, C.A., Hill, W., & Roberts, C.B. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behaviour? British Accounting Review, 30, 1-21. 3. Aguilera, R.V. (2005). Corporate governance and director accountability: an institutional comparative perspective. British Journal of Management, 16(l), 39-53. 4. Alsaeed, K. (2006). The association between firm-specific characteristics and disclosure: the case study of Saudi Arabia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(5), 476-496. 5. Andrew, B.H., Gul, F.A., Gutrie, J.E., & Teoh, H.Y. (1989). A note on corporate social disclosure practices in developing countries: The case of Malaysia and Singapore. British Accounting Review, 21, 371-376. 6. Amran, A., & Devi, S.S. (2008). The impact of government and foreign affiliate influence on corporate social reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(4), 386-404. 7. Ashforth, B.E., & Gibbs, B.W. (l990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, l(2), 177-194. 8. Barako, D.G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H.Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosures by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107-125. 9. Belkhir, K. (2004). Board of directors' size and performance in the banking industry. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(2), 201-221. 10. Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2007). Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A framework and empirical evidence from Italy and United States. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(2), 269-296. 11. Branco, M.C., & Rodrigues, L.L. (2008). Social responsibility disclosure: A study of proxies for the public visibility of Portuguese banks. British Accounting Review, 40(2), 161-181. 12. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 120-136. 13. Brennan, N.M., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: An overview. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(7), 889-906. 14. Cahaya, F.R., Porter, S., Tower, G., & Brown, A. (2009). Labour practices and decent work disclosures in Indonesia, presented at the AFAANZ Conference, Adelaide. 15. Chau, G., & Gray, S.J. (2010). Family ownership, board independence and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19(2), 93-109. 16. Chen, C.J., & Jaggi, B. (2000). Association between independent non-executive directors, family control and financial disclosure in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9, 285-310. 17. Cheng, E.C.M., & Courtenay, S.M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 262-289. 18. Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Certo, S.T., & Roengpitya, R. (2003). Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 12-26. 19. Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian companies. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187-199. 20. Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures: A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. 21. de Villiers, C., & van Staden, C.J. (2010). Shareholders requirements for corporate environmental disclosures: A cross country comparison. British Accounting Review, 42(4), 227-240. 22. Donelly, R., & Mulcany, M. (2008). Board structure, ownership, and voluntary disclosure in Ireland. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 34(5), 416-29. 23. Elsayed, M.O., & Hoque, Z. (2010). Perceived international environmental factors and corporate voluntary disclosure practices: An empirical study. British Accounting Review, 42(1), 17-35. 24. Eng, L.L., & Mak, Y.T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22, 354-345. 25. Esa, E., Anum, N., & Ghazali, M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Malaysian Government-linked Companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(3), 292-305. 26. Forker, J.J. (1992). Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research, 22(86), 111-124. 27. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(.2), 4 7- 77. 28. Gujarati, D.N. (1995). Basic econometrics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 29. Gul, F.A., & Leung, S. (2004). Board leadership, outside directors' expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(5), 351-379. 30. Gunawan, J., Djajadikerta, H.G., & Smith, M. (2009). An examination of corporate social disclosures in the annual reports of Indonesian listed companies, Asia Pacific Centre for Environmental Accountability Journal, 15(1), 13-36. 31. GRI (2004). Public Agency Sustainability reporting: A GRI resource department in support of the Public Agency Sector Supplement Project, Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam. 32. Haniffa, R.M., & Cooke, T.E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 392-430. 33. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33(6/7), 1034-1062. 34. Hackston, D., & Milne, M.J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77-108. 35. Hahn, R., & Kuhnen, M. (2013). Detenninants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5-21. 36. Haran, H., Ibrahim, D.N., Ismail, I., Hoo, Q.C., N.N.K., Zainuddin, Y., Nasruddin, E., Saiful, S.R., & Hariri, H. (2006). Governance, ethics and corporate social responsibility of public listed companies in Malaysia. An unpublished report summited to the Institute Integriti Malaysia and IIM-MAREF Malaysia. 37. Hilman, A.J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Board of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396. 38. Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J.R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosure among US firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 497-527. 39. Ho, P.L., & Taylor, G. (2013). Corporate governance and different types of voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Malaysian listed firm. Pacific Accounting Review, 25(I), 4-29. 40. Ho, S.M., & Wong, S.K. (2001). A study of relationship between corporate governance structures and the extend of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10, 139-156. 41. Hendry, J. (2005). Beyond self-interest: Agency theory and the board in a satisfying world. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 55-63. 42. Islam, M.A., & Deegan, C. (2008). Motivations for an organization within a developing country to report social responsibility information. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(6), 850-874. 43. Jaffar, R., lskandar, T.M., & Mohamad, J.N. (2003). An investigation of environmental disclosures in Malaysia, National University of Malaysia, Bangi Selangor. 44. Janggu, T., Joseph, C., & Madi, N. (2007). The current state of corporate social responsibility among industrial companies in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(3), 9-18. 45. Jensen, M.C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48, 831-880. 46. Joseph, C., Plicher, R., & Taplin, R. (2014). Malaysian local government internet sustainability reporting. Pacific Accounting Review, 26(1), 75-93. 47. Kim, H., & Lim, C. (2010). Diversity, outsider directors and firm valuation: Korean evidence. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 284-291. 48. Lakhal, F. (2005). Voluntary earnings disclosures and corporate governance: Evidence from France. Review of Accounting and Finance, 4, 64-86. 49. Laksamana, I. (2008). Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1147-1182. 50. Lim, S., Matolcsy, Z., & Chow, D. (2007). The association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review, 16(3), 555-583. 51. Mohamad Zain, M., & Janggu, T. (2006). Corporate social disclosure of construction company in Malaysia. Malaysian Accounting Review, 5(1), 84-114. 52. Nik Ahmad, N.N., & Sulaiman, M. (2004). Environmental disclosures in Malaysian annual reports: A legitimacy perspective. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 14(1), 44-58. 53. Ntim, C.G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Black economic empowerment disclosures by South African listed corporations: The influence of ownership and board characteristics. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 121-138. 54. Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351-366. 55. Roa, K.K., Tilt, C.A., & Lester, L.H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian Study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(2), 143-163. 56. Roberts, J., Mcnulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16(I), 5-26. 57. Said, R., Zainuddin, Y.Hj., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosures and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian Public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 212-226. 58. Samaha, K., Dahawy, K., Hussainey, K., & Stapleton, P. (2012). The extent of corporate governance disclosure and its determinants in a developing market: The case of Egypt. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 28(I), 168-178. 59. Sawani, Y., Mohamed Zain, M., & Darns, F. (2010). Preliminary insights on sustainability reporting and assurance practices in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(4), 627-645. 60. Shamil, M.M., Shaikh, J.M., Ho, P.L., & Krisnan, A. (2014). The influence of board characteristics on sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence from Sri Lankan firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 22(2), 78-97. 61. Shan, Y.G. (2009). Related party disclosures in China: Influence of factors identified from agency, legitimacy, and signaling theories, presented at the symposium SA, Adelaide. 62. Sobhani, F.A., Amran, A., & Zainuddin, Y. (2009). Revisiting the practices of corporate social and environmental disclosure in Bangladesh. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 67-183. 63. Sobhani, F.A., Amran, A., & Zainuddin, Y. (2012). Sustainability disclosure in annual reports and websites: A study of the banking industry in Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production, 23, 75-85. 64. Sumiani, Y., Haslinda, Y., & Lehman, G. (2007). Environmental reporting in a developing country: A case study on status and implementation in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(10), 895-901. 65. Tilt, C.A. (1994). Pressure groups on corporate social disclosures: Some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 7(4), 47-72. 66. Thompson, P., & Zakaria, Z. (2004). Corporate social responsibility reporting in Malaysia: Progress and prospects. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 13(Spring), 125-136. 67. Teoh, H.Y., & Thong, G. (1984). Another look at corporate social responsibility and reporting: An empirical study in a developing country. Accounting, Organization and Society, 9(2), 189-206. 68. Wallage, P. (2000). Assurance on sustainability reporting: An auditor's view, Auditing: Journal of Practice and Theory, 19, 53-65. 69. Wilmshurst, T.D., & Frost, G.R. (2000). Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(1), 10-26. 70. Woodward, D.G., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and stakeholder information provision. British Journal of Management, 7(4), 329-347. 71. Zhang, L. (2012). Board demographic diversity, independence and corporate social performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(5), 686.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)