UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Full Text : |
Tujuan utama kajian ini ialah untuk mencadangkan satu model persamaan struktural bagi mengenal pasti hubungan antara peranan pemimpin pembelajaran profesional dan model pembelajaran profesional dengan amalan guru. Selain itu, kesan langsung dan kesan tidak langsung dalam kalangan pemboleh ubah-pemboleh ubah juga turut ditunjukkan.Kajian empirikal ini telah dijalankan di empat puluh satu buah sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia. Data diperoleh menerusi soal selidik terhadap 372 orang guru yang dipilih melalui pensampelan kelompok pelbagai peringkat. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa terdapat perhubungan berstruktur yang signifikan antara peranan pemimpin pembelajaran profesional, dan model pembelajaran profesionaldan amalan guru. Ujian Goodness-of-fit (GOF) χ² model persamaan struktural (SEM) untuk mengukur kesepadanan model dengan sampel yang dipilih pula adalah signifikan. Oleh itu, model persamaan struktural ini diharap dapat memberi informasi yang berguna kepada pemimpin pendidikan untuk meningkatkan pembelajaran profesional berasaskan sekolah menerusi peranan-peranan yang dimainkan oleh pemimpin sekolah, model-model pembelajaran yang digunakan serta amalan guru yang sesuai. |
References |
1. Adey, P. (2007). What’s next? CPD and the whole school. Dalam J. Dillon &M. Maguire (Eds.). Becoming a teacher: Issues in secondary teaching. (m.s.357-366).London: McGraw-Hill Open University Press
2. Amin Senin. (2005). Hubungan pengurusan pembangunan profesional sekolah dengan model pembangunan profesional serta pengaruhnya terhadap pengajaran guru di sekolah-sekolah menengah negeri Sabah. Tesis. Ph.D yang tidak diterbitkan. Kota Kinabalu: Universiti Malaysia Sabah.
3. Arbuckle, J., L. (2009). Amos 18 user`s guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
4. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. teaching and teacher education, 27(1), 1020. doi:16/j.tate.2010.08.007
5. Azwani Masuwai, Nor`ain Tajudin & Noor Shah Saad. (2016). Evaluating the face and content validity of a teaching and Learning Guiding Principles Instrument (TLGPI): A perspective study of Malaysian teacher educators. Geografia OnlineMalaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12, (3), 11-21. http://www.ukm.my/geografia/v1/?ver=loc
6. Blank, R. K., de las Alas & Smith, C. (2008). Does teacher professional development have effect on teaching and learning? Analysis of evaluation findings from programs for mathematics and science teachers in 14 states. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers.http:www.ccsso.org/projects/improving_evaluation_ of_professional _development
7. Bredeson, P. V. (2003). Designs for learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
8. Byrne, B., M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications and programming. New York: Routledge.
9. Choi, N., Fuqua, D., R., & Newman, J., L. (2009). Exploratory and confirmatory studies of the structure of the bem sex role inventory short form with two divergent samples. Educational and Psycological Measurement, 9, (4) 696-705.
10. Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: the challenges of lifelong learning. London: Routledge.
11. Drago-Severson, E. (2004a). Helping teachers learn: principal leadership for adult growth and development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
12. Drago-Severson, E. (2004b). Becoming adult learners: principles and practices for effective development. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Flowers, C. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of scores on the clinical experiance rubric: a measure of dispositions for preservice teachers. Educational and Psycological Measurement, 66(3),478-488.
14. Fowler, D. F. J. (2009). Survey research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
15. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2009). Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
16. Guskey, T.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5) 5-12.
17. Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
18. Guskey ,T.R. (2005). Take a second look at accountability. Journal of Staff Development, 26(1) 9-18.
19. Guskey, T. (2009). Closing the knowledge gap on effective professional development. Education Horizon, (Summer 2009), 224233.
20. Hair, J., F., Black, W., C., Babin, B., J., Anderson, R., E., & Tatham R., L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
21. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2011). Implementing change: patterns, principles and potholes. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Higgins, J. & Parsons, R. (2009). A successful professional development model in Mathematics: A system-wide New Zealand case. Journal of teacher education, 60(3), 231-242.
23. Hourani, R., B. & Stringer, P. (2015). Designing professional development for principals in a context of change: the case of Abu Dhabi. Professional Development in Education, 41:5, 777-805, DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2014.938356
24. Labone, E. & Long, J. (2016). Features of effective professional learning: a case study of the implementation of a system-based professional learning model. Professional Development in Education, 42:1, 54-77, DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2014.948689
25. Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful school leadership: what is it and how it influences pupil learning (Research Report RR800). England: Department for Education and Skills, University of Nottingham. http:/www.wallacefoundation.org .
26. Lindstrom, P. H., & Speck, M. (2004). The principal as professional development leader. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
27. How Yen Ken. (2005). Pelaksanaan program perkembangan staf di sekolah menengah di Kuala Lumpur. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
28. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1-55.
29. Icobucchi, D. (2010). Structural equation modeling: Fit indices, sample size and advance topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2010) 90-98.
30. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2009). Laporan Tahunan 2009. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
31. Kline, R., B. (2010) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press: New York.
32. Kose, B. W. (2009). The principal's role in professional development for social justice: An empirically-based transformative framework. Urban Education, 44(6), 628-663. doi:10.1177/0042085908322707
33. Kuijpers, J. M., Houtveen, A. A. M., & Wubbels, T. (2010). An integrated professional development model for effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 16871694. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.021
34. Lokman Mohd Tahir, M Al Muzammil Yassin & Chua Lay Kah. (2009). Keperluan latihan dan kursus kepada guru besar untuk peningkatan profesionalisme. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan. 19(01), 23-44.
35. Mahaliza Mansor. (2013). Pembinaan model pembelajaran profesional berasaskan sekolah di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia. Tesis. Ph.D yang tidak diterbitkan. Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
36. Mohamad Nizam, Zakiah, Sazali dan Mohd Sofian. (2007). Pembelajaran pasukan dan kepimpinan pengetua dalam mewujudkan organisasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 19(02), 67-95.
37. Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan & Abdul Rashid Mohamed. (2009). Malaysian english teachers' satisfaction level of their professional development. Dalam Seminar Jawatankuasa Penyelarasan Pendidikan Guru 2009. Ipoh: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
38. Murphy, C. U., & Lick, D. W. (2005). Whole-faculty study groups creating professional learning communities that target student learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
39. Nunnally, J.,C., & Bernstein, I., H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. OECD. (2010). TALIS 2008 Technical Report. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/16/14/44978960.pdf .
41. Omar Abdull Kareem & Khuan Wai Bing. (2005). Perkembangan profesional guru secara berterusan: perspektif pembangunan sumber manusia. Jurnal Masalah Pendidikan. http://myais.fsktm.um.edu.my/4991/
42. Ramlee Ismail, Jamal @ Nordin Yunus & Hariri Kamis. (2011). Analisis data dan pentafsiran dengan menggunakan SPSS. Kuala Lumpur: Titisan Ilham.
43. Rizvi, M. (2008). The role of school principals in enhancing teacher professionalism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(1), 85-100. doi:10.1177/1741143207084062
44. Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E. Z. (2009). Schools as professional learning communities: collaborative activities and strategies for professional development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
45. Robin Sabai. (2005). Supervisory practices and professional development in secondary school in Betong Division, Sarawak. Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
46. Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul: bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Penerbit UPM.
47. Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 40-57.
48. Speck, M., & Knipe, C. (2005). Why can't we get it right? Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
49. Subhan Zein. (2016). Factors affecting the professional development of elementary English teachers, Professional Development in Education, 42:3, 423-440, DOI: 10.1080/19415257 .2015. 1005243
50. Tabachnick, B., G., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistic. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
51. Tallerico, M. (2005). Supporting and sustaining teachers' professional development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
52. Ullman, J., & Bentler, P. (2004). Structural equation modeling. Dalam M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Ed.), Handbook of data analysis (m.s. 224-247). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.
53. Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: a status report on teacher development in the United States and aboard. Dallas, Texas: National Staff Development Council.
54. Zepeda, S. J. (2008). Professional development. New York: Eye on Education |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |