Grammar errors made by ESL tertiary students in writing

Swaran Singh Charanjit Kaur, Jageer Singh Amreet Kaur, Abd Razak Nur Qistina, Ravinthar Thilaga,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	P Philology. Linguistics
ISSN :	1916-4742
Main Author :	Swaran Singh Charanjit Kaur, Jageer Singh Amreet Kaur, Abd Razak Nur Qistina, Ravinthar Thilaga,
Title :	Grammar errors made by ESL tertiary students in writing

Year of Publication :

2017

Full Text :

The educational context in Malaysia demands students to be equipped with sound grammar so that they can produce good essays in the examination. However, despite having learnt English in primary and secondary schools, students in the higher learning institutions tend to make some grammatical errors in their writing. This study presents the grammatical errors made by tertiary students in their writing. The participants were a group of Diploma students who sat for a university entrance exam.One hundred and forty-four written essays of the students were collected and analysed using content analysis. Findings revealed that subject-verb agreement and tenses were the most common type of errors. Students over-generalised and perceived that the tenses could be used interchangeably.Another common error found was in the students’ construction of complex sentence. In such constructions, they failed to include essential and nonessential clauses. If teachers do not teach strategies toassist students in comprehending the concept of Subject-Verb Agreement (SVA), tenses, essential and nonessential clauses, these students will continue to make such errors in their tertiary education. The findings may have useful implications for English language teachers as understanding students’ learning difficulties and providing appropriate grammar instruction is the key to effective teaching for ESL teachers.

References

1. Azar, B. S. (1999). Understanding and using English grammar. New York: Pearson Education. 2. Braddock, R., Lloyd-Jones, R., & Schoer, L. (1963). Research in written composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. 3. Brown, H. D. (1980). Principles of language learning and teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. 4. Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900000866 5. Calkins, L. M. (1980). When children want to punctuate. Language Arts, 57, 567-573. 6. Carter, R. (1997). Investigating English discourse: Language, literacy and literature. London: Routledge. 7. Chin, B. A. (2000). The role of grammar in improving students’ writing. Sadlier: Oxford. 8. Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5(4), 161-169. 9. Corder, S. P. (1978). Error analysis interlanguage and second language acquisition. Language Teaching & Linguistics: Surveys, 6(4), 60-78. 10. Corpuz, V. A. F. (2011) Error correction in second language writing: Teachers' beliefs, practices, and students' preferences. Master of Education Thesis, Queensland University of Technology. 11. Crowley, B. P., & Delfico, J. F. (1996). Content analysis: A methodology for structuring and analyzing written material. United States General Accounting Office (GAO), Program Evaluation and Methodology Division. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/80/76281.pdf 12. Crystal, D. (1999). The penguin dictionary of language (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books. 13. Darus, S, & Subramaniam, K. (2009). Error analysis of the written English essays of secondary school students inMalaysia: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 483-495. 14. DiStefano, P. & Killion, J. (1984). Assessing writing skills through a process approach. English Education, 16(4), 203-207. 15. Foppoli, J. (2011). Is grammar really important for a second language student? Retrieved on January 10, 2015 from http://www.eslbase.com/articles/grammar. 16. Ganapathy, M. & Kaur, S. (2014). ESL students’ perceptions of the use of higher order thinking skills in English language writing. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(5), 80-87. 17. Ghabool, N., Edwina, M., & Kashef, H. S. (2012). Investigating Malaysian ESL students’ writing problems on conventions, punctuation, and language use at secondary level. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(3), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v2i3.1892 18. Harris, R. J. (1962). An experimental inquiry into the functions and value of formal grammar in the teaching of written English to children aged twelve to fourteen. Ph.D. dissertation. University of London. 19. Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Conference on Research in English. 20. James, C. (2001). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 21. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman assessment battery for children (2nd ed.) (K-ABC-II).Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. 22. Khairiah, A. (1970). Factors influencing the learning of English Language in selected Malay medium schools in Malaysia – A research proposal. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1). 23. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman. 24. Mohtar, T. M. T., Kepol, N., Ahmad, A. Z. L, Singh, S. C. K, Yan, N., & Mat, M. (2017). Validation of the scaffolding model and modules for teaching ESL writing skills in national schools in Malaysia. Unpublished ERGS Research Report, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim. 25. Musa, C. N., Lie, Y. K., & Azman, H. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia, Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 35-51. 26. Myles, (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. Retrieved on 2.3.2017 from http://tesl-ej-org/ej/22/al.html 27. Naeini, J. (2008). Error correction: An indication of consciousness-raising. Novitas ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 2(2), 120-137. 28. Narinasamy, I., Mukundan, J., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2013). The use of progressives among Malaysian ESL students. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n11p39 29. Noraisah Muhari & Wan Fara Adlina Wan Mansor. (2008). An analysis of ESL students’ multimedia project work: A case of language transfer. (Unpublished project paper). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia. 30. Nor Hashimah Jalaluddin, Norsimah, M. A., & Kesumawati, A. B. (2008). The mastery of English language among lower secondary school students in Malaysia: A linguistic analysis. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 106-119. 31. Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. USA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Richards, J. C.(ed). (1973). Error analysis. London: Longman. 32. Palpanadan, S., Fauziah, I., & Abdul, R. S. (2015). Role of model essays in developing students writing skills in Malaysian schools: A review of literature. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 56-61. 33. Pandian, A. (2006). Whatworks in the classroom? Promoting literacy practices in English. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 11, 1-25. 34. Ramaiah, M. (1997). Reciprocal teaching in enhancing the reading ability of ESL students at the tertiary level. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 35. Richards, J. C. (Ed.). (1973). Error analysis. London: Longman. 36. Rogers, C. R. (1967). The interpersonal relationship in the facilitation of learning. In T. Leper (Ed). The person in the process. Washington, D. C.: National Education Association, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, pp. 1-18. 37. Ruziah, Md. Z. (2006). Enhancing the correct use of prepositions through error identification drill exercises among the KPLI (M) students. JURNAL IPBA, 3(3), 10-15. 38. Saadiyah, D., & Subramaniam, K. (2009). Error analysis of the written English essays of secondary school students in Malaysia: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 483-495. 39. School Certificate Attainment Report (2005). Ministry of Education, Malaysia (Laporan Prestasi SPM, 2004 Pengarah Peperiksaan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia). 40. Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. New York: Oxford University Press. 41. The Star Online. (2014). Kulasegaran: SPM results 2014: Overall performance takes a dip. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/03/03/spm-results-down/ 42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 43. Wee, R. (2009). Sources of errors: An interplay of interlingual influence and intralingual factors. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 349-39. 44. Wee, R., Sim, J., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Enhancing the quality of EAP writing through overt teaching. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n3p58 45. Wee, R., Sim, J., & Jusoff, K. (2010). Verb-form errors in EAP writing. Educational Research and Review, 5(1) 16-20. 46. Zerin, S. (2007). Teaching writing to young learners. BRAC University. 47. Zheng, C., & Park, Tae-Ja. (2013). An analysis of errors in English writing made by Chinese and Korean university students. Theory and Practise in Language Studies, 3(2), 1342-1360. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.8.1342-135

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page