UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :Article
Subject :L Education (General)
ISSN :1750-385X
Main Author :Kin Tai Mei, Abdull Kareem Omar,
Title :Measuring teacher attitudes toward change : an empirical validation
Hits :1037
Year of Publication :2017
PDF Full Text :You have no permission to view this item.

Full Text :
The objectives of the study were to validate a substantiated Teacher Attitudes towards Change (TATC) model and an instrument to identify critical components of TATC. A total of 936 teachers from 47 high-performing secondary schools completed the survey. Five different pretests had been applied to ensure the validity and reliability of the instrument: (a) review by academic colleagues; (b) verification and comments from panel; (c) personal interviews with respondents about the questionnaire format, syntax and design; (d) evaluation of item clarity; and (e) assessment of internal consistency reliability. Following these, exploratory factor analysis was employed to identify the underlying factors, whereas confirmatory factor analysis was applied to test the measurement models. The analysis yielded a three-factor model: (a) cognitive; (b) behavioural; and (c) affective reaction to change. The results demonstrated a good fit of the model: normed x2 = 4.412, TLI = 0.966, CFI = 0.977 and RMSEA = 0.060. Psychometric analyses provided evidence for convergent validity, discriminant validity and construct reliability. The TATC model is an empirically tested model derived in local Malaysian setting. It provides direction for practitioners in planning and designing training programs for school principals in enhancement of positive TATC. The TATC scale offers a promising measure for examining TATC for practitioners and researchers.

References
1. Aslan, M., Beycioglu, K. and Konan, N. (2008) ‘Principals’ openness to change in Malatya, Turkey’, International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp.1–13. 2. Bianey, C., Ulloa, R. and Adams, S.G. (2004) ‘Attitude toward teamwork and effective teaming’, Team Performance Management, Vol. 10, Nos. 7/8, pp.145–151. 3. Bodur, O.H., Brinberg, D. and Coupey, E. (2000) ‘Belief, affect, and attitude: alternative models of the determinants of attitude’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp.17–28. 4. Boyd, B., Gove, S. and Hitt, M. (2005) ‘Construct measurement in strategic management research: illusion or reality’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.239–257. 5. Bouckenooghe, D. (2009) ‘Change recipients’ attitudes toward change: a review study’, Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series, Vol. 14, pp.201–217. 6. Coch, L. and French, J.R.P. (1948) ‘Overcoming resistance to change’, Human Relations, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.512–532. 7. Cunningham, C. (2006) ‘The relationships among commitment to change, coping with change, and turnover intentions’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp.29–45. 8. Dunham, R.B., Grube, J.A., Gardner, D.G., Cummings, L.L. and Pierce, J.L. (1989) The Development of an Attitude toward Change Instrument, Unpublished Discussion Paper 124, Strategic Management Research Centre, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 9. Elias, S.M. (2009) ‘Employee commitment in times of change: assessing the importance of attitude towards organizational change’, Journal of Management, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp.37–55. 10. Elizur, D. and Guttman, L. (1976) ‘The structure of attitudes toward work and technological change within an organization’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp.611–622. 11. Farley, S.D. and Stasson, M.F. (2003) ‘Relative influences of affect and cognition on behavior: are feelings or beliefs more related to blood donation intentions?’, Experimental Psychology, Vol. 50, pp.55–62. 12. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (2010) Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach, Psychology Press, New York. 13. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. (1981) ‘Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, pp.382–388. 14. Fullan, M. (2007) The New Meaning of Educational Change, 4th ed., RoutledgeFalmer, London. 15. Gardner, P.L. (1995) ‘Measuring attitudes to science: unidimensionality and internal consistency revisited, Research in Science Education, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.283–289. 16. Hair Jr., J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 17. Hall, G.E. and Hord, S. (2010) Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes, Pearson, Boston, MA. 18. Hayes, J. (2010) The Theory and Practice of Change Management, 3rd ed., Palgrave Macmillan, New York. 19. Holt, D.T., Armenakis, A.A., Field, H.S. and Harris, S.G. (2007) ‘Readiness for organizational change: the systematic development of a scale’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp.232–255. 20. Huy, Q.N. (2002) ‘Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: the contribution of middle managers’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp.31–69. 21. James, C. and Connolly, U. (2000) Effective Change in Schools, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 22. Kasapoğlu, K. (2010) Relations between Classroom Teacher Attitudes toward Change Perceptions of ‘constructivist’ Curriculum Change and Implementation of Constructivist Teaching and Learning Activities in Class at Primary School Level, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,Middle East Technical University, Turkey. 23. Kiefer, T. (2005) ‘Feeling bad: antecedents and consequences of negative emotions in ongoing change’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 8, pp.875–897. 24. Martin, A.J., Jones, E.S. and Callan, V.J. (2006) ‘Status differences in employee adjustment during organizational change’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.145–162. 25. Larsen, R.J. and Diener, E. (1992) ‘Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion’, in Clark, M.S. (Ed.): Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Sage, pp.25–59, Newbury Park, CA. 26. Ministry of Education Malaysia (2013) Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025, Ministry of Education Malaysia, Putrajaya. 27. Mossholder, K.W., Settoon, R.P., Armenakis, A.A. and Harris, S.G. (2000) ‘Emotion during organizational transformations: an interactive model of survivor reactions’, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.220–243. 28. Oreg, S. (2006) ‘Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp.73–101. 29. Oreg, S., Vakola, M. and Armenakis, A.A. (2007, August) ‘Organizational member’s reactions to organizational change: a review of empirical findings’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA. 30. Persic, M., Ursic, D. and Veselinovic, D. (2014) ‘The impact of the implementation of a learning organization on the formation of a positive organizational identity’, International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.165–180. 31. Piderit, S.K. (2000) ‘Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: a multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp.783–794. 32. Sabates, L.A. and Capdevila, J.M. (2010) ‘Contribution for attitude change theory on the conceptual relation between attitudes and competencies’, Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp.1283–1302. 33. Smollan, R.K. (2006) ‘Minds, hearts and deeds: cognitive, affective and behavioral responses to change’, Journal of Change Management, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.143–158. 34. Streiner, D.L. (1994) ‘Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis’, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp.135–140. 35. Spreitzer, G.M. and Mishra, A.K. (2002) ‘To stay or to go: voluntary survivor turnover following an organizational downsizing’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp.707–729. 36. Thomas, B. (2003) ‘Innovation support networks and SMEs in industrial South Wales’, International Journal of Applied Management Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp.15–27 37. Trafimow, D. and Sheeran, P. (1998) ‘Some tests of the distinction between cognitive and affective beliefs’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 34, pp.378–397. 38. Underwood, C. (2002) ‘Belief and attitude change in the context of human development, in sustainable human development’, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK. Available online at: http://www.eolss.net 39. Vakola, M. and Nikolaou, I. (2005) ‘Attitudes toward organizational change: what is the role of employees, stress and commitment?’, Employee Relations, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp.160–174. 40. Yung, C.K. (2004) Factors Predicting Korean Vocational High School Teachers’ Attitudes toward School Change, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.