Productivity change in higher education sector: a case study of Malaysian Universities

Salleh Mad Ithnin, Arjomandi Amir, O'Brien Martin,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
Main Author :	Salleh Mad Ithnin, Arjomandi Amir, O'Brien Martin,
Title :	Productivity change in higher education sector: a case study of Malaysian Universities

Place of Production :	HRMARS
Year of Publication :	2017

Full Text :

This study is the first to apply the Malmquist total factor productivity index and its components under a variable-returns-to-scale (VRS) assumption to the higher education sector. By using this approach, we provide a more realistic and accurate shape of the production frontier than the traditional one, which is obtained using the constant-returns-to-scale (CRS) assumption in previous analyses of productivity changes in higher education institutions. In order to demonstrate the value of this approach, we use data on Malaysian public universities

References

1. Agasisti, T., & Johnes, J. (2009). Beyond frontiers: Comparing the efficiency of higher education decision-making units across more than one country. Education Economics, 17, 59–79. 2. Bradley, S., Johnes, J., & Little, A. (2010). Measurement and determinants of efficiency and productivity in the further education sector in England. Bulletin of Economic Research, 62, 1–30. 3. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393–414. 4. Dai, P. V., & Delpachitra, S. (2015). The RER misalignment and total factor productivity: An Empirical analysis in East Asian economies. Economic Papers, 34(3), 177-191. 5. Drew, J., M. K., & Dollery, B. (2015). What determines efficiency in local government? A DEA analysis of NSW local government. Economic Papers, 34(4), 243-256. 6. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhongyang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84, 66–83. 7. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 229–53. 8. Gilbert, R. A., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Effects of deregulation on the productivity of Korean banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 133–55. 9. Johnes, J. (2008). Efficiency and productivity change in the English higher education sector from 1996/97 to 2004/5. The Manchester School, 76(6), 74. 10. Paudel, R. C. (2014). Economic growth in developing countries: Is landlockedness destiny? Economic Papers, 33(4), 339-361. 11. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Productivity growth in industrialized countries. CORE Discussion Papers 1998036, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). 12. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1999). Estimating and bootstrapping malmquist indices. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 459–471. 13. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2000). A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27, 779–802. 14. Wilson, P. W. (2006). FEAR 1.0 user’s guide. Department of Economics, Clemson University, Clemson, USA

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page