1. Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2000). Amalgamations and the effficiency of Queensland TAFE Institute. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Vacational Education Research, 8, 1–19. 2. Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review, 22, 89–97. 3. Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2009). Competition and efficiency: Oversea students and technical efficiency in Australian and New Zealand Universities. Education Economics, 17, 31–57. 4. Agasisti, T., & Johnes, J. (2009). Beyond frontiers: Comparing the efficiency of higher education decision-making units across more than one country. Education Economics, 17, 59–79. 5. Ahn, T., Arnold, V., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1989). DEA and ratio efficiency analysis for public institutions of higher learning in Texas. Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 5, 165–85. 6. Ahn, T., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1988). Some statistical and DEA evaluations of relative efficiencies of public and private institutions of higher learning. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 22, 259–69. 7. Assaf, A. (2011). A fresh look at the productivity and efficiency changes of UK airlines. Applied Economics, 43, 2165–175. 8. Athanassapoulos, A. D., & Shale, E. (1997). Assessing the comparative efficiency of higher education. Education Economics, 5, 117–34. 9. Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35, 57–80. 10. Balcombe, K., Davidova, S., & Latruffe, L. (2008). The use of bootstrapped Malmquist indices to reassess productivity change findings: an application to a sample of Polish farms. Applied Economics, 40, 2055–61. 11. Beasley, J. E. (1990). Comparing university departments. Omega, 18, 171–83. 12. Beasley, J. E. (1995) Determining teaching and research efficiencies. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46, 441–52. 13. Boon, N. S. (2010). Governance of education related ECCE policies in Malaysia. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 4(1), 45–57. 14. Bradley, S., Johnes, J., & Little, A. (2010). Measurement and determinants of efficiency and productivity in the further education sector in England. Bulletin of Economic Research, 62, 1–30. 15. Burgess, J. F., & Wilson, P. W. (1995). Decomposing hospital productivity changes, 1985–1988:A nonparametric Malmquist approach. The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6, 343–63. 16. Carrington, R., Coelli, T., & Rao, D. S. P. (2005). The performance of Australian universities: conceptual issues and preliminary results. Economic Papers of the Economic Society of Australia, 24, 145–63. 17. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393–414. 18. CDC. (2007). Curriculum development centre, Ministry of Education Malaysia (Early Childhood Care and Education Policy Implementation Review 2007). 19. Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Springer Science and Business Media, New York. 20. Cokgezen, M. (2009). Technical efficiency of faculties of economics in Turkey. Education Economics, 17, 81–94. 21. Colbert, A., Levary, R. R., & Shaner, M. C. (2000). Determining the relative efficiency of MBA programs using DEA.European Journal of Operational Research,125,656–69. 22. Dahari, Z., & Ya, M. S. (2011). Factors that influence parents’ choice of pre-schools education in Malaysia: An exploratory study. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 115-128 23. Emrouznejad,A.,& Thanassoulis,E.(2005).A mathematical model for dynamic efficiency using data envelopment analysis.Applied Mathematics and Computation,160, 363–78. 24. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Norris, M. (1997). Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries: Reply. American Economic Review, 87, 1040–3. 25. Färe, R., Grosskopf,S., Lindgren,B., & Roos,P.(1992). Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980–1989: A nonparametric Malmquist approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 85–101. 26. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhongyang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84, 66–83. 27. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 229–53. 28. Flegg, A. T., & Allen, D. O. (2007). Does expansion cause congestion? The case of the older British universities, 1994–2004. Education Economics, 15, 75–102. 29. Flegg, A. T., Allen, D. O., Field, K., & Thurlow, T. W. (2004). Measuring the efficiency of British universities: A multi-period data envelopment analysis. Education Economics, 12, 231–49. 30. Galdeano-Gómez, E. (2008). Productivity effects of environmental performance: Evidence from TFP analysis on marketing cooperatives. Applied Economics, 40, 1873–88. 31. Gilbert, R. A., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Effects of deregulation on the productivity of Korean Banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 133–55. 32. Glass, J. C., McCallion, G., McKillop, D. G., Rasaratnam, S., & Stringer, K. S. (2006). Implications of variant efficiency measures for policy evaluations in UK higher education. SocioEconomic Planning Sciences, 40, 119–42. 33. Haksever, C., & Muragishi, Y. (1998). Measuring value in MBA programmes. Education Economics, 6, 11–25. 34. Hanke, M., & Leopoldseder, T. (1998). Comparing the efficiency of Austrian universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 4, 191–97. 35. Johnes, G. (1995). Scale and technical efficiency in the production of economic research. Applied Economics Letters, 2, 7–11. 36. Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (1993). Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: An application of data envelopment analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 45,332–47. 37. Johnes, G., & Schwarzenberger, A. (2010). Differences in cost structure and the evaluation of efficiency: the case of German universities. Education Economics, 19, 487–9. 38. Johnes, J. (2006a). Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 25, 273–88. 39. Johnes, J. (2006b). Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK universities 1993.European Journal of Operational Research,174,443–56. 40. Johnes, J., & Johnes, G. (1995). Research funding and performance in UK university departments of economics: A frontier analysis. Economics of Education Review, 14, 301–14. 41. Joumandy, O., & Ris. C. (2005). Performance in European higher education: A nonparametric production frontier approach. Education Economics, 13, 189-205. 42. Kao, C. (1994). Evaluation of junior colleges of technology: The Taiwan case. European Journal of Operational Research, 72, 43–51. 43. Kaur, S., & Sirat, M. (2010). Going for global university ranking through the accelerated programme for excellence (APEX) in Malaysia: Full throttle ahead, in Quality Assurance and University Rankings in Higher Education in the Asia Pacific, (Eds) S. Kaur, M. Sirat and W.G. Tierney, Universiti Sains Malaysia Press, Pulau Pinang, pp. 194–217. 44. Kempkes, G., & Pohl, C. (2010). The efficiency of German universities – some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods. Applied Economics, 42, 2063–79. 45. Kneip, A., Park, B., & Simar, L. (1996). Note on the convergence of nonparametric DEA efficiency measures, CORE Discussion Papers 1996039, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-laNeuve. 46. Korhonen, P., Tainio, R., & Wallenius, J. (2001). Value efficiency analysis of academic research. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 121–32. 47. Lindsay, A. W. (1982). Institutional performance in higher education: The efficiency dimension. Review of Educational Research, 52, 175–99. 48. Lovell, C. A. K. (2000). Editor’s introduction. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 5–6. 49. Madden, G., & Savage, S. (1997). Measuring public sector efficiency: A study of economics departments at Australia universities. Education Economics, 5, 153–68. 50. McMillan, M. L., & Chan, W. H. (2006). University efficiency: A comparison and consolidation of results from stochastic and nonstochastic methods. Education Economics, 14, 1–30. 51. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007) Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2105–25. 52. Meho, L. I., and Rogers, Y. (2008). Citation counting, citation ranking and h-index of humancomputer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1711–26. 53. Meng, W., Zhang, D., Qi L., & Liu, W. (2008). Two level DEA approaches in research evaluation. Omega, 36, 950–7. 54. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2007). The National Higher Education Strategic Plan Beyond 2020. Malaysian Government Press, Kuala Lumpur. 55. Ministry of Higher Education. (2009). Malaysia Higher Education Statistics, various years. Planning and Research Division, Malaysian Government Press, Putrajaya. 56. Mustafa, L. M., Yunus, N. K. Y., & Azman, M. N. A. (2014). An overview of private preschool in Malaysia: Marketing strategies and challenges. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 105–113. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.013 57. Ng, Y. C., & Sung Ko, L. (2000) Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher educations: An application of data envelopment analysis. Education Economics, 8, 139–56. 58. Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 161–9. 59. Parteka, A., & Wolszczak-Derlacz, J. (2011). Dynamics of productivity in higher education: CrossEuropean evidence based on bootsrapped Malmquist indices, Working Papers No. 2011–10, 60. Department of Economics, University of Milan, Milan. PEMANDU. (2012). Overview of the GTP (pp. 8–27). 61. Post, T., & Spronk, J. (1999). Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 472–87. 62. Ray, S. C., & Desli, E. (1997). Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries: Comment. The American Economic Review, 87, 1033–9. 63. Sarafoglou, N., & Haynes, K. E. (1996). University productivity in Sweden: A demonstration and explanatory analysis for economics and business programs. Annals of Regional Science, 30, 285–304. 64. Sarrico, C. S., & Dyson, R. G. (2000). Using DEA for planning in UK universities – an institutional perspective. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 789–800. 65. Sarrico, C. S., Hogan, S. M., Dyson, R. G., & Athanassopoulos, A. D. (1997). Data envelopment analysis and university selection. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48, 1163–77. 66. Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 67. Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London. 68. Simar, L. (1992). Estimating efficiencies from frontier models with panel data: A comparison of parametric nonparametric and semi-parametric methods with bootstrapping.Journal of Productivity Analysis,3,167–203. 69. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998a). Productivity growth in industrialized countries. CORE Discussion Paper 036, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve. 70. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998b). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44, 49–61. 71. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1999). Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 459–71. 72. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2000). Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of the art. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 49–78. 73. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A., & Barboy, A. (1994) Academic departments efficiency via DEA. Computers and Operations Research, 21, 543–56. 74. SMD, School of Malaysia Directory (2014). Early Childhood Care & Education (ECCE) in Malaysia at a Glance (for newborns to 6-year-olds). Retrieved from School Malaysia Early Childhood & Pre-Tertiary Education. Retrieved from http://www.schoolmalaysia.com/resources/education_system.php 75. Tajnikar, M., & Debevec, J. (2008) Funding system of full-time higher education and technical efficiency: case of the University of Ljubljana, Education Economics, 16, 289–303. 76. Tauer, L. W., Fried, H. O., & Fry, W. E. (2007). Measuring efficiencies of academic departments within a college. Education Economics, 15, 473–89. 77. Tomkins, C., & Green, R. (1988). An experiment in the use of data envelopement analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting. Financial Accountability and Management, 4, 147–65. 78. Warning, S. (2004). Performance difference in German higher education: Empirical analysis of strategic groups. Review of Industrial Organization, 24, 393–408 79. Wheelock, D. C., & Wilson, P. W. (1999). Technical progress, inefficiency and productivity change in US banking 1984–1993. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 31, 212–34. 80. Wilson, P. W. (2006). FEAR 1.0 User’s Guide, Department of Economics, Clemson University, Clemson, USA. 81. Worthington, A. C., & Lee, B. L. (2008). Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998–2003. Economics of Education Review, 27, 285–9