Adventure based learning module: content validity and reliability process

Setambah Mohd Afifi Bahurudin, Mohd Tajudin Nor’ain, Adnan Mazlini, Mat Saad Muhamad Ikhwan,

Full Text

This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of Adventure Based Learning module on Basics Statistics for Institute of Teachers Education students using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Percentage Calculation Method (PCM). The assessment was conducted through the evaluation by 7 experts and 17 students selected via purposive sampling. Three instruments were used for assessment are expert opinion instruments, content validity instruments and reliability module instrument. The result of analysis, CVI and PCM is 0.98 and 83.4%. This module also have 0.71and 0.73 of reliability value. The results of the study prove that the instrument has high validity and good reliability. Therefore, this module has a great potential as a good module. This module is recommended to be used and tested for its effectiveness. The module is also a form of alternative teaching methods to guide lecturer or teacher to add value to students in terms of critical thinking and leadership skills.

References

1. Ahmad, J. (2015). Modul Motivasi Diri (Second Edi). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. 2. Chua Y.P. (2006). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill. 3. Darussalam, G., & Hussin, S. (2016). Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. 4. DeVon, H. a., Block, M. E., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., … KostasPolston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability [Electronic Version]. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155–164 http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x 5. Fraenkal, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Eighth). New York: McGraw-Hill. http://doi.org/10.1037/032719 6. Ghani, F.A., & Aris, M. (2012). Pembinaan, Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Modul Kemahiran. Jurnal Teknologi, 58(2012), 45–50. 7. Idris, N. (2005). Pedagogi Dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn Bhd. 8. Ismail, M.H. (2012). Kajian Mengenai Kebolehpasaran Siswazah di Malaysia : Tinjauan dari Perspektif Majikan Study on Employability of Graduates in Malaysia : A Survey of Employer Perspectives. In Prosiding PERKEM VII (Vol. 2, pp. 906–913). 9. Ismail, N.A. (2011). Graduates ’ Characteristics and Unemployment : a Study Among Malaysian Graduates. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(16), 94–102. 10. Jackson, S. L. (2009). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach (Third edit). Belmont: Wadsworth,cengage Learning. 11. Koh, L. L., Choy, S. K., Lai, K. L., Khaw, A. H., & Seah, A. K. (2008). Kesan pembelajaran koperatif terhadap sikap dan pencapaian Matematik bagi murid-murid sekolah rendah di sekitar bandar Kuching. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL, 8, 50–64. 12. Lawshe, C. (1975). A Quantitative Approach To Content Validity 1. Personnel Psychology, (1), 563–575. 13. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantificatiom of Content Validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. 14. Mariani, A., & Ismail, Z. (2013). Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru Matematik Ke Atas Amalan Pengajaran Kreatif. In 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE 2013) (pp. 181–187). 15. Matore, M,E.M., & Khairani, A.Z. (2015). Psychometric assessment on Adversity Quotient instrument (IKBAR) among polytechnic students using Rasch model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies (EET 2015), (15), 52– 57. Retrieved from http://www.inase.org/library/2015/barcelona/EDU.pdf 16. Ministry of Education. (2000). Kajian Antarabangsa Ketiga Matematik dan Sains. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 17. Mok, S. S. (1993). Pengajaran Matematik untuk Kursus Perguruan. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn Bhd. 18. Ngasiman, N. (2014). Kesan Kaedah Pembelajaran Koperatif Terhadap Pencapaian Pelajar dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematik. (Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan Teknikal dan Vokasional). Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Johor. 19. Noah, M.N. & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaan Modul: Bagaimana Membina Modul Latihan dan Modul Akademik (First Edit). Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia. 20. Rajendran, N. (2001). The Teaching of Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Malaysia. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 2(1), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.563 21. Saad, S., Saad, N.S., & Dollah, M.U. (2012). Pengajaran kemahiran berfikir: Persepsi dan Amalan Guru Matematik Semasa Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di Bilik Darjah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 2(1), 18–36. 22. Samsudin, W. N. A. M., & Musa, M. (2016). Implementasi Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) Guru Matematik Sekolah Menengah dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik. In International Conference on Education Mathematics and Science (ICEMS 2016) in Conjunction with 4th International Postgraduate Conference on Science and Mathematics 2016 (IPCSM 2016) (p. 46). 23. Setambah, M.A.B., Tajudin, N.M., & Adnan, M. (2016). Impact of Statistic Adventure Based Learning Module on Students Achievement. Imperial Journal of Interdiciplinary Research (IJIR), 2(11), 1432–1437. 24. Tajudin, N.M., Puteh, M., Adnan, M., Abdullah, M.F.N.L., & Ibrahim, I. (2015). Persepsi Dan Amalan Pengajaran Guru Matematik Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Algebra. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 5(2), 12–22. 25. Yeo, S. M., & Zhu, Y. (2005). Higher-Order Thinking in Singapore Mathematics Classrooms. Retrieve from http://www.ibarian.net