UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Full Text : |
This proposal article has two aims which is developing a module using adventure-based learning (ABL) method and test the effect of the ABL modules on three variables. The variables to be tested are the Basic Statistics, critical thinking and leadership skills of students. This research involves development design and quasi experimental pre-posttest nonequivalent design. So this research involved two phases: development and testing phase. In the development phase, three important steps that should be followed is the process of building modules, validity and reliability of the module and do pilot study of modules. Modules that have validity and reliability were tested at the Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Ipoh which selected by purposive sampling. While the sample is selected among the student population of the campus is the second semester Preparation Bachelor of Teaching programed. The samples were randomly selected using cluster sampling and divided into a control group (conventional method) and the treatment group (ABL method). The results of this study are expected to open educators minds to doing innovative teaching methods. It thus is able to guide the implementation of the 21st century teaching methods. The impact of this research is also expected to assist the Ministry of Education to achieve the vision and aspirations of the country. |
References |
1. Azhari Mariani, & Zaleha Ismail. (2013). Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru Matematik Ke Atas Amalan Pengajaran Kreatif. In 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE 2013) (pp. 181–187).
2. Carrier, S. J., Tugurian, L. P., & Thomson, M. M. (2013). Elementary Science Indoors and Out: Teachers, Time, and Testing. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2059–2083. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9347-5
3. Chua Y.P. (2006). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill.
4. Cooley, S. J., Holland, M. J. G., Cumming, J., Novakovic, E. G., & Burns, V. E. (2014). Introducing the use of a semi-structured video diary room to investigate students’ learning experiences during an outdoor adventure education groupwork skills course. Higher Education, 67(1), 105–121. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9645-5
5. Doering, A., Scharber, C., Riedel, E., & Miller, C. (2010). “Timber for president”: Adventure learning and motivation. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21, 483–513.
6. Doering, A., Miller, C., & Veletsianos, G. (2008). Adventure Learning: Educational, Social , and Technological Affordances for Collaborative Hybrid Distance Education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(612), 249–265. http://doi.org/Article
7. Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2008). What lies beyond effectiveness and efficiency? Adventure
learning design. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 137–144. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.07.004
8. Ghazali Darussalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2016).Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
9. Koh, L. L., Choy, S. K., Lai, K. L., Khaw, A. H., & Seah, A. K. (2008). Kesan pembelajaran koperatif terhadap sikap dan pencapaian Matematik bagi murid-murid sekolah rendah di sekitar bandar Kuching. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL, 8, 50–64.
10. Larson, D. A. (2010). Adventure Learning : Not Everyone Gets to Play. In Honeyman, J. Coben, & G. De Palo (Eds.), Venturing Beyond the Classroom: Volume 2 in the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series (pp. 201–216). Saint Paul: DRI Press.
11. Miller, C., Veletsianos, G., & Doering, A. (2008). Curriculum at forty below: a phenomenological inquiry of an educator/explorer’s experience with adventure learning in the Arctic.Distance Education, 29(3), 253–267. http://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802395789
12. Miller, B. G., Hougham, R. J., & Eitel, K. B. (2013). The practical enactment of Adventure Learning: Where will you AL@? TechTrends, 57(4), 28–33. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11528- 013-0674-9
13. Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
14. Mohd Afifi Bahurudin Setambah, Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin, & Mazlini Adnan. (2016). Walking , Explore Race and Flying Fox Adventure Activity in Learning Statistics : Effect on Leadership Skills. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 3(2), 1–8.
15. Noor’ani Ahmad, Nor Rahmah Abd Hamid, & Nor Shamsidah Amir Hamzah. (2008). Pelaksanaan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah (Pbm) Dalam Subjek Matematik
Kejuruteraan 1 Untuk Sampel Sarjana Muda Fakulti Kejuruteraan Awam Dan Alam Sekitar Di Uthm 1. In Seminar Kebangsaan Matematik & Masyarakat (pp. 199–210).
16. Noraini Idris. (2005). Pedagogi Dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn Bhd.
17. Rajendran, N. (2001). The Teaching of Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Malaysia. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 2(1), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.563
18. Rajendran N.S (2010). Teaching Thinking Skills at Institutions of Higher Learning:Lesson Learned. Pertanika Jurnal of Social Sciences and Humanities,18(S), 1-14.
19. Siti Zabidah, M. (2006). Kesan Pendekatan Penyebatian Kemahiran Berfikir Kreatif Dalam Pengajaran Karangan Deskriptif dan Karangan Imaginatif dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan IV. (Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah Tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Sains Malaysia. Pulau Pinang.
20. Stuhr, P. T., Sutherland, S., Ressler, J., & Ortiz-Stuhr, E. M. (2016). The ABC’s of AdventureBased Learning. Strategies, 29(1), 3–9. http://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2015.1111787
21. Sukiman Saad, Noor Shah Saad, & Mohd Uzi Dollah. (2012). Pengajaran kemahiran berfikir: Persepsi dan Amalan Guru Matematik Semasa Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di Bilik Darjah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 2(1), 18–36.
22. Veletsianos, G. (2010). A Small-Scale Activity and its Implications for Higher Education Practice
and Research. Spring, 16(1), 89–104. Retrieved from http://ineducation.ca/article/smallscale-adventure-learning-activity-and-its-implications-higher-education-practice-and-r
23. Veletsianos, G., & Kleanthous, I. (2009). A review of adventure learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 84–105.
24. Wan Nor Atiqah, & Muzirah Musa. (2016). Implementasi Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) Guru Matematik Sekolah Menengah dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik. In International Conference on Education Mathematics and Science (ICEMS 2016) in Conjunction with 4th International Postgraduate Conference on Science and Mathematics 2016 (IPCSM 2016) (p. 46).
25. Yee Mei Heong, Jailani Md Yunos, Widad Othman, Razali Hassan, & Tee Tze Kiong. (2010). Penggunaan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Marzano dalam Penjanaan Idea. In Seminar Majlis Dekan Pendidikan IPTA. 2-3 August 2010, Hotel Concorde, Shah Alam.
26. Yeo, S. M., & Zhu, Y. (2005). Higher-Order Thinking in Singapore Mathematics Classrooms. Retrieve from http://www.ibarian.net |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |