Professionals back to school-an engineering outreach programme: a case study in Malaysia

Balakrishnan Balamuralithara, Azman Mohamed Nor Azhari,

Full Text

The introduction of engineering education in K-12 classrooms opens up a number of opportunities for STEM learning to support the acquisition of knowledge and skills related to science and mathematics subjects. Several initiatives, including outreach programmes, have been carried out to promote engineering subjects and professions. To supplement the existing Malaysian curricula, an outreach programme seems a viable solution to help improve the understanding and awareness of the importance of engineering among students. In this regard, an engineering outreach program called Professionals Back to School was carried out involving a group of 40 students with the participation of several engineering practitioners. Later all the participants were interviewed to elicit feedback on the programme. The findings of the interview showed that all the participants agreed that the outreach programme was beneficial, and a majority found it to be motivational. Given these positive findings, engineering outreach programmes are highly recommended to Malaysian secondary schools to help create interest among schoolchildren in STEM education and professions.

References

1. Brophy,S.;Klein,S.;Portsmore,M.;and Rogers,C.(2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. 2. Rogers, C.; and Portsmore, M.D. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3), 17-28. 3. Council, T. A. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. National Academies Press. 4. Jayarajah, K.; Saat, R.M.; and Rauf, R.A.A. (2014). A review of science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) education research from 1999-2013: A Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 155-163. 5. Carr, R.L.; Bennett, L. D.; and Strobel, J. (2012). Engineering in the K-12 STEM standards of the 50 US states: An analysis of presence and extent. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 539-564. 6. DeJarnette, N. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77-84. 7. Katehi, L.; Pearson, G.; and Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education. Committee on K-12 Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council of the National Academies. 8. Holmquist, S. (2014). A multi-case study of student interactions with educational robots and impact on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) learning and attitudes. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5043/ 9. Moore, T.J.; Glancy, A.W.; Tank, K.M.; Kersten, J.A.; Smith, K.A.; and Stohlmann, M.S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering education Research (J-PEER), 4(1), 2. 10. NAE (National Academy of Engineering). 2008. Changing the conversation: messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. 11. Mentzer, N.; Huffman, T.; and Thayer, H. (2014). High school student modeling in the engineering design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(3), 293-316. 12. Nordin, K. (2012). Jumlah Pelajar Sains Di IPT Makin Kurang, Berita Harian [The total science students at local varsities are decreasing]. Retrieved from Berita Harian. Retrieved from http://www.bharian.com.my/articles/ JumlahpelajarsainsdiIPTmakinkurang/Article/ 13. Kier, M.W.; Blanchard, M.R.; Osborne, J.W.; and Albert, J.L. (2014). The development of the stem career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461-481. 14. Capobianco, B.M.; Diefes‐dux, H.A.; Mena, I.; and Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304-328. 15. Yarker, M.B.; and Park, S. (2012). Analysis of teaching resources for implementing an interdisciplinary approach in the K-12 classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,Science & Technology Education,8(4), 223-232. 16. Kieong, C.K. (2012). Vision 100K. Paper presented at the The Instituition of Engineers, 53rd Presidental Address, Malaysia. 17. Adams, R.; Turns, S.J.; and Atman, C.J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies 24(3),275-94.