A systematic review of remote laboratory work in science education with the support of visualizing its structure through the histcite and citespace software

Tho Siew Wei, Yeung Yau Yuen, Wei Rui, Chan Ka Wing, So Winnie Wing-mui,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	Q Science (General)
ISSN :	1571-0068
Main Author :	Tho Siew Wei, Yeung Yau Yuen, Wei Rui, Chan Ka Wing, So Winnie Wing-mui,
Title :	A systematic review of remote laboratory work in science education with the support of visualizing its structure through the histcite and citespace software

Place of Production :	CrossMark
Year of Publication :	2017

Full Text :

Laboratory work, particularly the latest remote laboratories (RLs), has been assumed to have a general positive effect on science education because practical work can provide diverse learning experiences and enhance thinking skills suitable for the 21st century. However, there has not been a synthesis of the science education research to support this assumption. The objective of this study is to systematically review the growth of educational research on laboratory work, particularly in RLs, utilizing a series of review processes with innovative software for visualizing structural relationships. The combined use and support of HistCite and CiteSpace software enabled the visualization of the citation structure and history of articles. The findings revealed that RLs were a state-of-the-art subset of laboratory work and a new way of conducting laboratory work that has gained fairly wide research attention in engineering education over the past two decades. Thus, this innovative literature review process has established a solid background for future research and development efforts on RLs in science education dealing with scientific and engineering practices.

References

1. Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2009). Applying Kolb’s experiential learning cycle for laboratory education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 283-294. 2. Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy Z. K. (2011). The TriLab, a novel ICT based triple access mode laboratory education model. Computers & Education, 56(1), 262–274. 3. Barrios, A., Panche, S., Duque, M., Grisales, V. H., Prieto, F., Villa, J. L. … & Canu, M. (2013). A multi-user remote academic laboratory system. Computers & Education, 62, 111–122. 4. Cooper, M., & Ferreira, J. M. M. (2009). Remote laboratories extending access to science and engineering curricular. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(4), 342–353. 5. Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Im, S., & Ma, J. (2007). Constructing reality: A study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 14(2), Article 7. 6. Corter, J. E., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2011). Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2054–2067. 7. Cui, L., Tso, F. P., Yao, D., & Jia, W. (2012). WeFiLab: A web-based wifi laboratory platform for wireless networking education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(4), 291-303. 8. Fabregas, E., Farias, G., Dormido-Canto, S., Dormido, S., & Esquembre, F. (2011). Developing a remote laboratory for engineering education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1686–1697. 9. Fiore, L., & Ratti, G. (2007). Remote laboratory and animal behaviour: An interactive open field system. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1299–1307. 10. Gillet, D., Ngoc, A. V. N., & Rekik, Y. (2005). Collaborative web-based experimentation in flexible engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 696-704. 11. Gustavsson, I., Nilsson, K., Zackrisson, J., Garcia-Zubia, J., Hernandez-Jayo, U., Nafalski, A. … & Hkansson, L. (2009). On objectives of instructional laboratories, individual assessment, and use of collaborative remote laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(4), 263-274. 12. Kong, S. C., Yeung, Y. Y., & Wu, X. Q. (2009). An experience of teaching for learning by observation: Remote-controlled experiments on electrical circuits. Computers & Education, 52(3), 702-717. 13. Lang, D., Mengelkamp, C., Jäger, R. S., Geoffroy, D. Billaud, M., & Zimmer, T. (2007). Pedagogical evaluation of remote laboratories in eMerge project. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 57-72. 14. Lindsay, E. D., & Good, M. C. (2005). Effects of laboratory access modes upon learning outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 619-631. 15. Lowe, D., Newcombe, P., & Stumpers, B. (2013). Evaluation of the use of remote laboratories for secondary school science education. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1197-1219. 16. Nickerson, J. V., Corter, J. E., Esche, S. K., & Chassapis, C. (2007). A model for evaluating the effectiveness of remote engineering laboratories and simulations in education. Computers & Education, 49(3), 708–725. 17. Ogot, M., Elliott, G., & Glumac, N. (2003). An assessment of in-person and remotely operated laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 57-64. 18. Sauter, M., Uttal, D. H., Rapp, D. N., Downing, M., & Jona, K. (2013). Getting real: The authenticity of remote labs and simulations for science learning. Distance Education, 34(1), 37–47. 19. Scanlon, E., Colwell, C., Cooper, M., & Di Paolo, T. (2004). Remote experiments, re-versioning and re-thinking science learning. Computers & Education, 43(1),153-163. 20. Shyr, W. J. (2011). Development and evaluation of mechatronics learning system in a web-based environment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational TechnologyTOJET, 10(1), 89-96. 21. Stefanovic, M. (2013). The objectives, architectures and effects of distance learning laboratories for industrial engineering education. Computers & Education, 69, 250–262. 22. Tawfik, M., Sancristobal, E., Martin, S., Gil, R., Diaz, G., Colmenar, A. … & Gustavsson, I. (2013). Virtual Instrument Systems in Reality (VISIR) for remote wiring and measurement of electronic circuits on breadboard. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(1), 60-72. 23. Tiwari, R., & Singh, K. (2011). Virtualisation of engineering discipline experiments for an Internet-based remote laboratory. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 671-692. 24. Torre, L., Heradio, R., Jara, C., Sanchez, J., Dormido, S., Torres, F., & Candelas, F. (2013). Providing collaborative support to virtual and remote laboratories learning technologies, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(4), 312-323. 25. Tzafestas, C. S., Palaiologou, N., & Alifragis, M. (2006). Virtual and remote robotic laboratory: Comparative experimental evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 360-369. 26. Vargas, H., Sanchez Moreno, J., Jara, C. A., Candelas, F. A., Torres, F., & Dormido, S. (2011). A network of automatic control web-based laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(3), 197-208.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page