UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Full Text : |
The Malaysian Ministry of Education had advocated for the integration of Higher Order Thinking Skills [HOTS] in mathematics and science. The result of TIMSS has placed greater emphasis on the need to teach HOTS effectively. Our argument is that in order for HOTS to have a significant impact on students’ engagement with and improvement on mathematical problem solving, researchers ought to undertake a fine-grained analysis of student performances in relation to particular tasks and use this information to help teachers understand and integrate HOTS in their teaching. In this paper, we present a critical analysis of selected mathematical problem tasks and demonstrate how to better support students in the use of HOTS in making progress with such tasks. In so doing we present a methodology that can be utilised by teachers better understand the role of HOTS in empowering students move from lower to higher levels of cognitive funtioning in the context of demanding tasks. Our methodology provides an important starting point for the design of future professional development programs for Malaysian mathematics teachers in articulating HOTS and implementing them in regular mathematical problem solving teaching and learning. |
References |
1. Curriculum Development Centre (2011). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah, Spesifikasi Kurikulum Matematik Tingkatan 1, Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum,
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Available online: http://www.gov.moe.my
2. Curriculum Development Centre (2013). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi dalam Sains dan Matematik (Higher Order Thinking in Sciences and Mathematics (HOTsSM). Available
online: http://www.gov.moe.my
3. Goldin. G. A. (2008). Perspectives on representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.) Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 176- 201), New York: Routledge.
4. Goldin, G. A. and Kaput, J. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning
and doing mathematics. In L.P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G.A. Goldin, and B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 397-430), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Hiebert, J. and Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97), New York: Macmillan.
6. Marshall, J. C., and Horton, R. M. (2011). The relationship of teacher facilitated inquiry-based
instruction to student higher-order thinking. School Science and Mathematics, 111(3):93-101.
7. Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschoool to PostSecondary Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
8. Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin and Mohan Chinnappan. (2016). The Link between Higher Order Thinking Skills, Representation and Concepts in Enhancing TIMSS Tasks. International Journal of Instruction. 9(2): 199-214.
9. Schoenfeld, A. H. and Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In D.Tirosh and T. Wood (Eds.), The International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Vol. 2. Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education, (pp.
321-354), Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |