Teaching professionalism values and its relationship with teacher leadership attribute

Yusof Hamidah, Masood Fariza, Mohd Noor Mohd Asri, Abdul Jalil Norasibah,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
ISSN :	2222-6990
Main Author :	Yusof Hamidah, Masood Fariza, Mohd Noor Mohd Asri, Abdul Jalil Norasibah,
Title :	Teaching professionalism values and its relationship with teacher leadership attribute

Place of Production :	HRMARS
Year of Publication :	2017

Full Text :

This research aims to identify the relationship between the values of teaching professionalism and teacher leadership attribute. A total of 168 teachers from three primary schools were selected to participate in this study. A set of questionnaire was used for data collection and the data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics. The findings show that the level of self-values, professionalism values and social values of primary school teachers are relatively high, while the result for the teacher leadership attribute also show a relatively high level. The overall findings lead us to conclude that there is a significant correlation relationship between the values of teaching professionalism and the teacher leadership attribute. The Implications of this study is; every teacher must have high professionalism values as the key feature in order to become a leader.

References

1. Abd Rashid, A.R. (2005). Profesionalisme keguruan: Prospek dan cabaran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. 2. Abdullah, M. (2009, May 14). Komitmen guru tingkatkan sistem pendidikan. Utusan Malaysia Online, pp. Rencana. 3. Angelle, P.S., Nixon, T.J., Norton, E.M., & Niles, C.A. (2011). Increasing organizational effectiveness: An examination of teacher leadership, collective efficacy, and trust in schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Pittsburgh, 19 Nov. 2011. 4. Baharin, A. & Suzana, M. (2010). Pengetahuan Etika Profesion Perguruan Dalam Kalangan Guru Pelatih 4SPH. Fakulti Pendidikan UTM. Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/10740/1/Pengetahuan_Etika_ProfesionPerguruan_Dalam_Kalangan_Guru_Pelatih_4SPH_Fakulti_Pendidikan_UTM.pdf 5. Cuban, L. (1984). Transforming the frog into a prince: Effective school research, policy and practice at the district level. Harvard Education Review, 54(2), 129-151. 6. Danielson, C. (2006). Teacher leadership that strengthens professional practice. Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 7. Danielson, C. (2007). The many faces of leadership. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 14-19. 8. De Bevoise, W. (1984). Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader.Educational Leadership, 41, 14-20. 9. Gallagher, D.R., Bagin, D., & Moore, E.H. (2005). The school and community relations. Boston, MA: Pearson. 10. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5‐44. 11. Hargreaves, A. & Goodson, I. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I. Goodson and A. Hargreaves (eds) Teachers’ Professional Lives. London: Falmer. 12. Harris, A. (2001). Improving Schools through Teacher Leadership. Educational Journal, 59, 22-23. 13. Harris, A. & Jones, M. (2010). Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving Schools, 13(2), 172-181. 14. Harris, A. & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. England. Open University Press. 15. Hassan, A. & Mohd, A. (2000), Kemahiran interpersonal untuk guru. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd. 16. Hussein Mahmood (1993). Kepimpinan dan keberkesanan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. 17. Gani Hamzah, M.S., Basri, R. & Mohd Daud, S., (2010). Karakter guru ilmu diagung guru disanjung. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. 18. Idris, N., & Hamzah, R. (2012). Nilai profesionalisme bakal guru berteraskan indikator standard guru Malaysia (SGM). Jurnal Teknologi, 60(1), 31-37. 19. Jackson, T., Burrus, J., Bassett, K., & Roberts, R. (2010). Teacher leadership: An assessment framework for an emerging area of professional practice. Princeton, NJ: ETS. 20. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2003). Etika kerja. Kuala Lumpur: KPM. 21. Krisko, M.E. (2001). Teacher leadership: A profile to identify the potential. Paper presented at the Biennial Convocation of Kappa Delta Pi. (ERIC). Document Reproduction Services No.ED459147 22. Lieberman, A. & Wood, D. (2003). Inside the national writing project: Connecting network learning and classroom teaching. Teachers College Press. 23. Mahat, M.A. (2009). Guru pendidik, pengajar atau pendakwah. Shah Alam: Karisma Publications Sdn. Bhd. 24. Md Sawari, S.S. & Mustaffa, A. (2014). Guru bersahsiah mulia menurut pandangan Ibnu Shahnun: Analisa buku adab Al Mualimin. Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 1-10. 25. Ministry of Education. (2007). Education Development Master Plan 2001-2010. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 26. Raudzah, S. (2008). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi salah laku pelajar dan hubungannya dengan personaliti pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(4), 4-7. 27. Sharratt, L., & Fullan, M. (2009).Realization: The change imperative for deepening district-wide reform. Thousand. Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452219486 28. Singh, S. & Esa, A.(2008). Kepimpinan dalam menghadapi isu-isu semasa pendidikan. Seminar Kebangsaan Pengurusan Pendidikan PKPGB 2008, UTHM. 29. Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership and Management, 22(1), 73-92. 30. Strodl, P. (1992, March). A model of teacher leadership. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Research Association, Hilton Head, SC. 31. Sulaiman, H., Abdullah, S.S., & Yusop, F. (2006). Peranan ibu bapa dan guru dalam membantu pelajar-pelajar menghadapi masalah pencapaian akademik. Jurnal Masalah Pendidikan,2 (6), 9-10. 32. Taib, I., & Ngah, M. (2011). Kualiti guru permulaan: Pendekatan model persamaan model persamaan structural. Seminar Majlis Dekan-dekan Fakulti Pendidikan IPTA 2011. Serdang: Fakulti Pendidikan, UPM. 33. The Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium. (2010). Teacher Leadership Standards. Retrieved from http://www.ctl.vcu.edu/images/15138_TeacherModelStandards.pdf 34. Wahid, A. & Ahya, Z.J. (2009). Pendidikan pembangunan modal insan. Perak: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 35. Wallace, M. (2002). Modeling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: primary school senior management teams in England and Wales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(2), 163-186.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page