Flood aftermath impact on business: a case study of Kuala Krai, Kelantan, Malaysia

Nayan Nasir, Mahat Hanifah, Hashim Mohmadisa, Saleh Yazid, A. Rahaman Zullyadini, See Koh Liew,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
ISSN :	2222-6990
Main Author :	Nayan Nasir, Mahat Hanifah, Hashim Mohmadisa, Saleh Yazid, A. Rahaman Zullyadini, See Koh Liew,
Title :	Flood aftermath impact on business: a case study of Kuala Krai, Kelantan, Malaysia

Place of Production :	HRMARS
Year of Publication :	2017

Full Text :

Floods are natural disasters which can cause problems and adverse effects on the population.These events will also cause destruction on a large scale. This study aims to identify loss of business property and determine the relationship between the type of business and the level of losses incurred by the trader. The methodology used was a survey using questionnaires. A total of 175 traders in Kuala Krai town was involved in the study and randomly selected. This study used a descriptive analysis of frequency, mean and cross tabulation analysis. The results of the analysis indicate that goods (Mean = 1.56, SD = 0.894) and premises / stalls / kiosks (mean = 1.56, SD = 0531) is a business property with the highest losses or impact. The study also found that the type of business goods (68.0%) is the highest type of business losses compared with business services (32.0%). This situation shows that the business of goods is a type of business experiencing the highest losses due to the destruction of goods and premises / stalls / kiosks. Therefore, an integrated flood management should play an important role in reducing the impact of flooding among traders, especially in terms of preparations to face floods in the future. These efforts will indirectly help to reduce losses among traders in the Bandar Kuala Krai

References

1. Chan, N. W. (1997). Increasing flood risk in Malaysia: Causes and solutions. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 6(2), 72–86. 2. eBanjir Negeri Kelantan. (2015). Laporan catatan aras air tertinggi mengikut tempat (In Malay). Retrieved March 20, 2016, from http://ebanjir.kelantan.gov.my/p_parpt01.php 3. Eden, P. & Matthews, G. (1997). Disaster management in libraries. Facilities, 15(1/2), 42–49. 4. Eshghi, K. & Larson, R. C. (2008). Disasters: Lessons from the past 105 years. Disaster Prevention and Management:, 17(1), 62–82. 5. Glaser, R., Riemann, D., Schönbein, J., Barriendos, M., Brázdil, R., Bertolin, C., Himmelsbach, I.(2010). The variability of European floods since AD 1500. Climatic Change, 101(1), 235–256. 6. Hammond, M. J., Chen, A. S., Djordjevic, S., Butler, D., & Mark, O. (2015). Urban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review.Urban Water Journal,12(1), 14–29. 7. Ibrahim, M. S. (2007). An overview on disasters. Journal Of Radiation Research, 16(5), 687–703. 8. Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa. (2011). Draf rancangan tempatan Jajahan Kuala Krai 2020: Jilid I penyataan bertulis (In Malay). Semenanjung Malaysia: Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa. 9. Kaklauskas, A., Amaratunga, D., & Haigh, R. (2009). Knowledge model for post-disaster management. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 13(2), 117–128. 10. Khan, H., Vasilescu, L. G., & Khan, A. (2008). Disaster management cycle-A theoretical approach. Journal of Management and Marketing, 6(1), 43–50. 11. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610. 12. McBean, E. A., Gorrie, J., Fortin, M., Ding, J., & Moulton, R. (1988). Flood depth-damage curves by interview survey. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 114(6), 613–634. 13. Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., & Thieken, A. (2010). Assessment of economic flood damage. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 10(8), 1697–1724. 14. Noor Suraya, R., Khushren, S., Zulkifli, Y., & Zulhilmi, I. (2015). Flood damage assessment: A review of flood stage–damage function curve. In ISFRAM 2014: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Flood Research and Management (p. 147). Springer. 15. Othman, L. (2014). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengenalan kepada teori dan metode (In Malay). Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 16. Rahman, M. R., Haque, A., Khan, M. S. A., Salehin, M., & Bala, S. K. (2005). Investigation of hydrological characteristics of flood 2004 with special emphasis on Dhaka City, Institute of Water and Flood Management, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka. 17. Soetanto, R., & Proverbs, D. G. (2004). Impact of flood characteristics on damage caused to UK domestic properties: The perceptions of building surveyors. Structural Survey, 22(2), 95–104. 18. Sundar, I., & Sezhiyan, T. (2007). Disaster management. New Delhi: Sarup & Sons. Tran, P., Marincioni, F., Shaw, R., Sarti, M., & Van An, L. (2008). Flood risk management in Central Viet Nam: Challenges and potentials. Natural Hazards, 46(1), 119–138. 19. Tuan Pah Rokiah, S. H., Baharum, M., & Hamidi, I. (2014). Kesediaan kognitif menghadapi banjir bagi meminimumkan kemusnahan dan kehilangan nyawa (In Malay). In: Prosiding PERKEM ke-9 (Vol. 9, pp. 851–858). Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu. 20. Tuan Pah Rokiah, S. H., Hamidi, I., & Raman, M. (2011). Implikasi bencana banjir terhadap sosioekonomi penduduk Lembangan Kelantan (In Malay). In: Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia Ke-6 (pp. 377–388). Melaka. 21. Wan Nur Tasnim, W. H., Nor Hidayati, Z., & Mohammad Nazir, A. (2015). Knowledge sharing and lesson learned from flood disaster: A case in Kelantan. Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 9(2), 1–10.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page