Validating the teaching and learning guiding principles for teacher educators from the perspective of policy makers and teacher trainers

Wahid Rosdy, Tek Ong Eng, Idris Noraini,

Full Text

This paper reports on the validation of the Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles for Teacher Educators by means of interviews with the two policy makers and three teacher trainers. Through document analyses of the prospectuses from certain reputable teacher education institutions as well as the policy documents from countries such as Finland, Australia, Singapore and USA the Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles comprising 6 themes were conceptualized, namely (1) intellectual excitement; (2) quality learning spaces; (3) constructive alignment; (4) international and cultural diversity; (5) climate of inquiry and critical reflection; and (6) nurture good values, attitude and behaviour. Nonetheless, the validity of the conceptualised Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles (TLGP) solely through document analyses is less rigour. Therefore, to increase the rigour, these TLGP were subjected to validation by experts consisting of two policy makers who once held the post of the deputy Director General of Education in the Malaysian Ministry of Education, and three senior teacher trainers at the Teachers’ Training Institutes. In the interview, these policy makers and teacher trainers were asked to provide their views of the conceptualised TLGP in terms of scope and breath. The interviews were recorded and subsequently transcribed so as to enable a recursive qualitative analysis. The results indicate that, while the policy makers and teacher educators were generally in agreement with the six themes in the conceptualised TLGP, they, however, extended these themes with two additional themes, namely (1) nature entrepreneurship and (2) value the mother nature. The validated Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles with 8 themes constitute the cornerstone of the development of Teaching and Learning Framework for teacher educators in preparing future teachers.

References

1. Barriball, K.L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting Data using a semi‐structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of advanced nursing, 19(2), 328-335. 2. Barone, T., Berliner, D. C., Blanchard, J., Casanova, U., & McGowan, T. (1996). A future for teacher education: Developing a strong sense of professionalism. In J. Sikula, T.J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2nd ed., pp. 1108-1149). New York: Macmillan. 3. Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2001). How to research (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press. 4. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input (pp. 3-7). Watertown, MA: Pathfinder International. 5. Bullough, R., & Gitlin, A. D. (2001). Becoming a student of teaching. New York: Routledge 6. Chenail, R. J. (2011). Interviewing the investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 255-262. 7. Clough, P., & Nutbrown, C. (2012). A student's guide to methodology (3rd ed.). London: Sage. Cochran-Smith, M., Villegas, A. M., Abrams, L., Chavez-Moreno, L.,Mills, T., & Stern, R. (2015).Critiquing teacher preparation research an overview of the field, Part II. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 109-121. 8. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education. Oxford: Routledge. 9. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (4th ed.). Boston, MA 02116. USA: Pearson Education, Inc. 10. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons. 11. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. USA: Pearson Higher Ed. 12. Gillham, B. (2000). Case Study Research Methods. Great Britain: Bloomsbury Publishing. 13. Goh, P. S. C., & Blake, D. (2015). Teacher preparation in Malaysia: Needed changes. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 469-480. 14. Goh, P. S. C., & Wong, K. T. (2014). Beginning teachers’ conceptions of competency:implications to educational policy and teacher education in Malaysia. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 13(1), 65-79. 15. Goh, P. S. C., Saad, N. S., & Wong, K. T. (2012). The ‘voices’ of beginning teachers in Malaysia about their conceptions of competency: A phenomenographic investigation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, Vol.37(7), 7. 16. Goh, P. S., & Matthews, B. (2011). Listening to the concerns of student teachers in Malaysia during teaching practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 36(3), 12. 17. Goodwin, A. L. (2012). Quality teachers, Singapore style. In Darling Hammond & Ann Lieberman (Eds). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices, (p.22-43).Oxon: Routledge. 18. Goodwin, A. L., Smith, L., Souto-Manning, M., Cheruvu, R., Tan, M. Y., Reed, R., & Taveras, L. (2014). What should teacher educators know and be able to do? Perspectives from practicing teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 65(4) 284–302 19. Gore, J. M., Griffiths, T., & Ladwig, J. G. (2004). Towards better teaching: Productive pedagogy as a framework for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(4), 375-387. 20. Hays, D. G., & Singh, A. A. (2011). Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. Guilford Press. 21. Jacob, S. A., & Furgerson, S. P. (2012). Writing interview protocols and conducting interviews: Tips for students new to the field of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(42), 1-10. 22. Krathwohl, D. R. (1998). Methods of Educational & Social Science Research: An Integrated Approach. (2nd Ed). MA: Addison Wesley Educational Publishing. 23. Ministry of Education Malaysia (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Malaysian Ministry of Education. 24. Musset, P. (2010). Initial Teacher Education and Continuing Training Policies in a Comparative Perspective: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review on Potential Effect. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 48. Mexico. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kmbphh7s47h-en 25. Opie, C. (2004). Research procedures. Doing educational research: A guide to first time researchers. 95-129. 26. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 27. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Elam, G. (2003). Designing and Selecting Samples. In Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., (Eds), Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers,(pp.77-108). London. Sage Publication. 28. Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socioscientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research.Contemporary trends and issues in science education (Vol. 39). 29. Sahlberg, P. (2012). The most wanted: Teachers and teacher education in Finland. In Darling Hammond & Ann Lieberman (Eds). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices, (p.1-21). Oxon. Routledge. 30. Sandlin, R. A. Young, B. L., & Karge, B. D. (1992). Teaching internships: Are they a viable route to California alternative rertification? Teacher Education Quarterly, 9-18. 31. Turney, C., & Wright, R. G. (1990). Where the buck stops: The teacher educators: A study of the characteristics, roles and effects of teacher educators with special reference to those who work in Australian Tertiary Institutions. St. Ives: Sydmac Academic Press.