|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Full Text : |
| Stimulated by my encounter with the strange term ‘hegemony’ – a dominant ideology that is largely invisible to its adherents - I (first author) recently ‘returned’ to my experiences of being in a secondary school chemistry class. Drawing on contemporary educational research paradigms, I designed an arts-based critical auto/ethnographic methodology. The research was governed by quality standards of transferability, trustworthiness, verisimilitude, crystallisation, polyvocality, pedagogical thoughtfulness, critical reflexivity and envisioning. In this research I identified six aspects of cultural hegemony that had negatively impacted my chemistry education experiences: teacher domination, curriculum content, perfectionism, competitive assessment, traditional teaching methods and poor classroom environment. An outcome of this professional self-study research is a vision for transforming chemistry education: (i) using recycled materials to create ‘green chemistry’ teaching and learning activities, (ii) applying critical pedagogy as a teaching and learning perspective, (iii) embracing technology as a supplement to teaching and learning, and (iv) applying science innovation ideas as part of classroom activities. This vision can be adapted and implemented by innovative teachers wishing to enliven their chemistry classrooms with more meaningful, stimulating and socially responsible learning experiences appropriate for the 21st century |
| References |
1. Afonso, E. de F. (2007). Developing a culturally inclusive philosophy of science teacher education in
Mozambique. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Curtin University.
2. Afonso, E. de F. & Taylor, P. C. (2009). Critical autoethnographic inquiry for culturesensitive professional development. Reflective Practice, 10(2), 273-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623940902786404
3. Akinsanya, C. & Williams, M. (2004). Concept mapping for meaningful learning. Nurse Education Today, 24(1), 41-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00120-5
4. Anderson, G. & Arsenault, N. (1998). Fundamentals of educational research (2nd ed.). London, UK: Falmer.
5. Andrade, J. M. R. D. & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York: Peter Lang.
6. Bonner, S. E. (2011). Critical theory: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Caravita, S. & Hallden, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 89-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/095 4752(94)90020-5
8. Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
9. Chapman, H. & Singleton, G. (2002). Moving water. In R. Inserra (Ed.), 101 cool science experiments (pp. 64). Victoria, Australia: Hinkler Books.
10. Chien, A. & Godshall, A. (2005). Magic water: A black box activity. School of the Future. http://www.scienceteacherprogram.org/genscience/Chien05Lesson/INDEX.HTM
11. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2008). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
12. Crehan, K. A. F. (2002). Gramsci on culture: Hegemony. London, UK: Pluto Press.
13. Cresswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and
qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
14. Cupane, A. (2008). Towards a culture-sensitive pedagogy of physics teacher education in Mozambique.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Curtin University.
http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R/?func=dbin-jumpfull&object_id=131184&local_base=GEN01-ERA02
15. Cupane, A. & Taylor, P. C. (2010, Jun). Finding a sustainable cultural identity as a science teacher educator: A Mozambican perspective. Paper presented at the XIV IOSTE Symposium, Bled, Slovenia, June 2010.
https://www.academia.edu/1181289/FINDING_A_SUSTAINABLE_CULTURAL_IDENTITY_AS_A_SCIENCE_TEACHER_EDUCATOR_A_MOZAMBICAN_PERSPECTIVE
16. Davis, E. A. (1998). Scaffolding students’ reflection for science learning. Doctoral dissertation,University of California, Berkeley.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f75d/c88104362f38fbb2cc1ef24d2d42b1fdb2ad.pdf
17. Doubler, S., Asbell-Clarke, J., Carraher, D. & Tobin, R. (2011). The inquiry project:Bridging research and practice. Concept cartoons. http://inquiryproject.terc.edu/curriculum/curriculum3/concept_cartoon/
18. Ellis, C. & Bochner, A. P. (2003). Autoethnography, personal narratives, reflexivity. In N.
19. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed.),
pp. 199-258. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20. Fleischer, L. E. (2009). Counter-hegemonic teaching. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
21. Goodrum, D. (2004). Teaching strategies for science classrooms. In G. Venville & V.Dawson (Eds.), The art of teaching science. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
22. Grossberg, L. (1996). History, politics and postmodernism: Stuart Hall and cultural studies. In D. Morley & K. H. Chen (Eds.), Critical dialogues in cultural studies. London: Routledge.
23. Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis? New York: The Falmer Press.
24. Hassard, J. & Dias, M. (2009). The art of teaching science. New York: Routledge.
25. Huckin, T. (2002). Principles of critical pedagogy [Giroux, 1991]. [viewed at
http://www.hum.utah.edu/uwp/presentations.html; not found 21 Dec 2016]
26. Hudson, J. (2005). A multi-lingual journal of book reviews. [viewed at
http://www.edrev.info/reviews/rev354.htm; not found 21 Dec 2016]
27. Jimenez-Gonzalez, C. & Constable, D. J. C. (2011). Green chemistry and engineering: A practical design approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
28. Joyce, C. (2006). Using concept cartoons for assessment. New Zealand Council for Educational
Research. https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz/using-concept-cartoons-assessment
29. Keogh, B. & Naylor, S. (1999). Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluation. International Journal of Science Education,21(4),431-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095006999290642
30. Kincheloe, J. L. (2004). Critical pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
31. Knowles, J. G. & Cole, A. L. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32. Lears, T. J. J. (1985). The concept of cultural hegemony: Problems and possibilities. The American Historical Review, 90(3), 567-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ahr/90.3.567
33. Mastroianni, D. (2002). Hegemony in Antonio Gramsci. [viewed at http://www.english.emory.edu/Bahri/
hegemony.html; not found 21 Dec 2016]
34. McAleese, R. (1998). The knowledge arena as an extension to the concept map: Reflection in action. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(3), 251-272.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1076/ilee.6.3.251.3602
35. McLaren, P. (1998). Critical pedagogy. Teaching Education, 9(1), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1047621970090101
36. Merli, P. (2010). Antonio Gramsci, Prison notebooks. International Journal of Cultural Policy,
16(1), 53-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10286630902971603
37. Merry, S. E. (2003). Hegemony and culture in historical anthropology: A review essay on Jean and John L. Comaroff's Of revelation and revolution. The American Historical Review, 108(2), 460-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ahr/108.2.460
38. Osborne, J., Duschl, R. & Fairbrother, R. (2002). Breaking the mould? Teaching science for public
understanding. London: Nuffield Foundation.
39. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2007). Validity issues in narrative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(4),
471-486. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/
10.1177/1077800406297670
40. Posner, G. J. (1992). Analyzing the curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
41. Rahmawati, Y. (2013). Revealing and reconceptualising teaching identity through the landscapes of culture, religion, transformative learning, and sustainability education: A transformation journey of a science educator. Doctoral dissertation, Curtin University.
http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R/?func=dbin-jumpfull&object_id=189013&local_base=GEN01-ERA02
42. Rahmawati, Y. & Taylor, P. C. (2017/in press). The fish becomes aware of the water in which it swims: Revealing the power of culture in her chemistry teaching identity. Cultural Studies of Science Education.
43. Rahmawati, Y. & Taylor, P. C. (2015). Moments of critical realisation and appreciation: A transformative chemistry teacher reflects. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 31-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.944142
44. Rikowski, G. & McLaren, P. (2002). Postmodernism in educational theory. In D. Hill, P. McLaren, M. Cole & G. Rikowski (Eds.), Marxism against postmodernism in educational theory (pp. 3-14). Oxford, UK: Lexington Books.
45. Rowe, R. C. (2003). Science with a smile-cartoon capers. Drug Discovery Today, 8(20), 919-920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02878-2
46. Rye, S. (2009). Why mistakes are good for us [Web log post, 12 November].http://suzannrye.blogspot.com/2009/
03/why-mistakes-are-good-for-us.html
47. Serbessa, D. D. (2006). Tension between traditional and modern teaching-learning approaches in Ethiopian primary schools. Journal of International Cooperation in Education,9(1), 123-140. http://home.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/cice/wpcontent/uploads/publications/Journal9-1/9-1-10.pdf
48. Settelmaier, E. (2003). Transforming the culture of teaching and learning in science: The promise of
moral dilemma stories: an interpretive case study. Doctoral dissertation, Curtin University.
http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R?func=dbin-jump-full&local_base=gen01-era02&object_id=14379
49. Shore, C. & Wright, S. (1997). Policy: A new field of anthropology. In C. Shore & S. Wright (Eds.), Anthropology of policy: Critical perspectives on governance and power (pp. 3-34).New York: Routledge.
50. Song, J. (2003). Pure blue sky: A reflective thinking about chemistry education in China. Masters dissertation. Science and Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University of Technology.
51. Song, J. & Taylor, P. C. (2005). Pure blue sky: A soulful autoethnography of chemistry teaching in China. Reflective Practice, 6(1), 141-163.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1462394042000326842
52. Spry, T. (2001). Performing autoethnography: An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706-732. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/
10.1177/107780040100700605
53. Taylor, P. C. (2014). Contemporary qualitative research: Toward an integral research perspective. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education: Volume II (pp. 38-54). New York: Routledge.
54. Taylor, P. C. (2008). Multi-paradigmatic research design spaces for cultural studies researchers embodying postcolonial theorising. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(4), 881-890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9140-y
55. Taylor, P. C. (1996). Mythmaking and mythbreaking in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1), 151-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00143930
56. Taylor, P. C., Taylor, E. & Luitel, B. C. (2012). Multi-paradigmatic transformative research as/for teacher education: An integral perspective. In K. G. Tobin, B. J. Fraser & C.McRobbie (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1-17). Dordrecht,Netherlands: Springer. The starfish story (n.d.). Readily available versions and accounts include
https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/56782.Loren_Eiseley;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Star_Thrower;
https://web.archive.org/web/20070929155500/http://www.starthrower.com/star_th rower_story_script.htm
57. Toon, T. Y., Leng, L. W. & Tin, T. O. (2009). Success chemistry SPM. Selangor: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.
Trujillo, N. (1991). Hegemonic masculinity on the mound: Media representations of Nolan Ryan and American sports culture. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8(3),
290-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039109366799
58. Uzuner, S. (2009). Questions of culture in distance learning: A research review. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-19.
http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.690
59. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60. Yusuf, M. (2011). Envisioning critical pedagogy in the chemistry classroom to deconstruct hegemonic
cultures. Unpublished masters dissertation. Science and Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |