The selection of meaningful approach to assess children's Science process skills (IR)

Nordin Mamat

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	Q Science (General)
ISSN :	2222-6990
Main Author :	Nordin Mamat
Additional Authors :	Nor Mashitah Mohd Radzi Loy, Chee Luen Sopia Md Yassin
Title :	The selection of meaningful approach to assess children's Science process skills (IR)

Place of Production :	HRMARS
Year of Publication :	2017
PDF Full Text :	The author has requested the full text of this item to be restricted.

Abstract :

This paper aims to produce an instrument of observation in the selection of meaningful approach to assess children’s science process skills. This instrument has four categories. First of all, the use of the type of approach encompasses the approaches of learning through play, thematic, integrated, mastery, contextual and project. Secondly, the suitability of the selection of approach encompasses relevance, parallelism, engaging. Thirdly, meaningful teaching encompassing the interaction or discussion, stimulation, involvement, curiosity and questioning and answering. Fourth, children’s science skills activities that cover problem solving, reasoning, looking into the process, analytical, inquiry and reflection. Every item in every category has four Likert scales. It is hoped that these items of observation develop can be used to assess the children science process skills.

References

1. Al-Hooli, A. A. (2001). Science and children’s literature: Preschool teacher’s attitudes and pedagogical content knowledge. Dissertation. University of Virginia. 2. Bahagian Pendidikan Awal Kanak-kanak. (2013). Kurikulum PERMATA Negara. Cyberjaya,Selangor: Prime Minister Office Malaysia. 3. Bhagwanji, Y. (2011). Early childhood environmental education rating. United States: The North American Association for Environment Education. 4. Bonner, D. P. (2012). The impact of formative assessment on student learning and teacher instruction. Dissertation. Jones International University. 5. Chesterfield, R. (1997). Classroom observation tools. United States: Agency for International Development Bureau for Economic Growth, Agriculture and Trade Office for Education. 6. Elfrink, T. R., Goldberg, J.M., Karlein, M.G., Bohlmeijer, E.T. & Clarke, A.M. (2017). Positive educative programme: A whole school approach to supporting children’s well-being and creating a positive school climate: a pilot study. Health Education, 117.2, 215-230. 7. Gloria, G.S. (2008). Teaching approaches and strategies. Philippines: KATHA Publishing Co. Inc. Kaplan, S. (2016). Pedagogy for early childhood gifted education. Gifted Child Today, July 2016,134-139. 8. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Kurikulum Standard Prasekolah Kebangsaan.Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. 9. Loy, C. L. (2017). Modul kursus pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam pendidikan awal kanak-kanak. Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Holding Sdn. Bhd. 10. Roy, K. (2006). Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice. Australia: Thom Social Science Press. 11. Vartuli, S., Snider, K. & Holley, M. (2016). Making ite real: A practice based early childhood teacher education program. Early Childhood Education Journal, Sep 2016, 503-514.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page