1. Akani, O. (2015). Laboratory Teaching: Implication on students’ achievement in chemistry in secondary schools in Ebonyi State of Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(30), 206–213.
2. Ateş, Ö. & Eryilmaz, A. (2011). Effectiveness of hands-on and minds-on activities on students’ achievement and attitudes towards Physics. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 1–22.
3. Bartholomew, P. N., Oyedepo, J. A., & Yusuf, J. A. (2011). Expository versus simulated laboratory in teaching professional courses. Journal of Research in National Development, 9(2), 52-58.
4. Başer, M., & Durmuş, S. (2010). The effectiveness of computer supported versus real laboratory inquiry learning environments on the understanding of direct current electricity among pre-service elementary school teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 47–61.
5. Bayrak, B., Kanli, U., & Ingec, S. (2007). To compare the effects of computer based learning and the laboratory based learning on students’ achievement regarding electric circuits. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,6(1),15–24.
6. Brown, R. (2003). Series and parallel resistors and capacitors. The Physics Teacher, 41(8), 483-485.
7. Cardak, O., Onder, K., & Dikmenli, M. (2007). Effect of the usage of laboratory method in primary school education for the achievement of the students' learning. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 1–11.
8. Demircioğlu, G., & Yadigaroğlu, M. (2011). The effect of laboratory method on high school students’understanding of the Reaction Rate. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 509–516.
9. Dhanapal, S., & Zi Shan, E. W. (2014). A study on the effectiveness of hands-on experiments in learning Science among year 4 students. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 3(1), 29–40.
10. Etiubon, R. U. & Udoh, N. M. (2017) Effects of practical activities and manual on science students’ academic performance on solubility in Uruan local education authority of Akwa Ibom State. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(3), 202–209.
11. Garzón, I., Cock, M. De, Zuza, K., van Kampen, P., & Guisasola, J. (2014). Probing university students’ understanding of electromotive force in Electricity. American Journal of Physics, 82(1), 72–79.
12. Harman, G., Cokelez, A., Dal, B., & Alper, U. (2016). Pre-service science teachers' views on laboratory applications in science education: the effect of a two-semester course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 12–25.
13. Hon, K., Jaafar, R., & Abdullah, N. S. Y. (2018). Developing and testing of open educational resources by utilising freeware and open-source based on technological instructional design content knowledge. Advanced Science Letters, 24(7), 5105-5109.
14. Lati, W., Supasorn, S., & Promarak, V. (2012). Enhancement of learning achievement and integrated science process skills using science inquiry learning activities of chemical reaction rates. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4471–4475.
15. Moll, R. F. & Milner-Bolotin, M. (2009). The effect of interactive lecture experiments on student academic achievement and attitudes towards Physics. Canadian Journal of Physics, 87, 917–924.
16. Musasia, A. M., Abacha, O. A., & Biyoyo, M. E., (2012). Effect of practical work in Physics on girls’ performance, attitude change and skills acquisition in the form two-form three secondary schools’ transition in Kenya. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(23), 151–166.
17. Musasia, A. M., Ocholla, A. A., & Sakwa, T. W. (2016). Physics practical work and its influence on students’ academic achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(28), 129–134.
18. Ogundiwin, O. A., Asaaju, O. A., Adegoke, A. I., & Ojo, A. T. (2015). Effect of group investigative laboratory strategies on students' achievement in Biology. Pyrex Journal of Research in Environmental Studies, 2(4), 035–041.
19. Ramly, R., Jaafar, R., Daud, A. N. M., Ali, S., Mokhtar, W. Z. A. W., Haron, R., & Safian, N. A. M. (2016). Effectiveness of multi-frames video recorded experiments on pre-university students’ achievement for Capacitor topic. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 3(2), 38–43.
20. Ramly, R., Jaafar, R., Haron, R., Mokhtar, W. Z. A. W., Ali, S., Daud, A. N. M., & Safian, N. A. M. (2014). Kajian keberkesanan demonstrasi syarahan interaktif berdasarkan sistem paparan multi-kerangka bagi Fizik Pra-Universiti: topik Kapasitor [Effectiveness study of interactive lecture demonstration based on multi-frames display system for Pre-University Physics: Capacitor topic]. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters,2,32–39.
21. Saripah Salbiah Syed Abdul Aziz, Asmahani Ahmad Suhairun, Salihan Siais, Othman Talib, Nor Zuhaidah Mohamed Zain, Tengku Putri Norisah Tengku Shariman, Kamaruzaman Jusoff. (2013). Keberkesanan modul multimedia kimia organik: mekanisme tindak balas SN1 dan SN2 [Effectiveness of organic chemistry multimedia module: SN1 and SN2 reaction mechanism]. Asia Pasific Journal of Educators and Education, 28, 53–68.
22. Sever, S., Yurumezoglu, K., & Oguz-Unver, A. (2010). Comparison teaching strategies of videotaped and demonstration experiments in inquiry-based science education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 2, 5619–5624.
23. Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students' achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 159–170.
24. Tüysüz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in Chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37–53.
25. Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science education students’ chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217–227.
26. Vetter, P., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics,72(1),98–115.
27. Yang, K., & Heh, J. (2007). The impact of Internet Virtual Physics Laboratory instruction on the achievement in Physics, science process skills and computer attitudes of 10th-grade students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 451–461.