UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| Graphing Calculator Circles Topic Test (GCCTT) Item developed based on the Table of Test Specification 3 Dimension (ToTS 3D) to test the skills of students in terms of graphics calculator skills and circles topic content. GCCTT Item consists of 20 items graphing calculator skills and 14 items of circle topic content. A pilot study using a descriptive quantitative approach carried out in 30 of students Form Two in two schools in Negeri Sembilan using simple random sampling method. To ensure quality GCCTT Item, the item was analysed using the Rasch Model for looking the reliability and validity of items. Reliability derived from the reliability index, meanwhile validity from the point measure correlation (PT-MEA Corr.), Outfit Mean Square (MNSQ) and the Z Standardized (ZSTD). The findings show that GCCTT Item has a high reliability value, 0.85. There are no misfit items detected on graphic calculator skills item except one misfit item detected on circle topic content item. After misfit item dropped, 33 GCCTT Items with quality value and PT-MEA Corr. positive can be produced to test the skills of graphic calculator and circles topic content. |
| References |
1. Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/ bookshl= en&lr=&id=FqF7n0zGJm0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=intro duction+to+research+in+education&ots=n6Hovzgo67&sig=FaAAiB_Xb7-s3XiA0zgYNyfDM8A 2. Azrillah Abdul Aziz, Mohd Saidfudin Masodi & Azami Zaharim (2013). Asas Model Pengukuran Rasch, Pembentukan Skala & Struktur Pengukuran. Bangi, Selangor: Penerbit UKM. 3. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model. In Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. 4. Churches, A. (2009). Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy. Retrieved February 6, 2015, from http://edorigami.wikispaces.com 5. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. 6. Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying Item Response Theory (IRT) Modeling To Questionnaire Development, Evaluation, And Refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(SUPPL. 1), 5–18. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0 7. Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2002). Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. The Lancet, 359(9301), 145–149. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673602073737 8. Howard, W., & Henry, B. (1988). Test Validity. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 9. Lembaga Peperiksaan (2013). Pentaksiran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Percetakan Surya Sdn. Bhd. 10. Linarce, J. M. (2012). Winsteps Tutorial 2. Retrieved December 24, 2016, from http://www.winsteps.com/a/winsteps-tutorial-2.pdf 11. Lund Research Ltd (2015). Descriptive Research Questions. Retrieved November 3, 2015, from http://dissertation.laerd.com/types?of?quantitative?research?question.php#one 12. Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018002005 13. The Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2001). What Is Descriptive Research? Retrieved September 14, 2015, from http://www.aect.org/edtech/ed1/41/41-01.html 14. Van Blerkom, M. L. (2009). Measurement and Statistics For Teachers (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieved from http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk/html/moreinfo.asp?bookid=536959849 15. Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V. (2007). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: part II--validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 204–234. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |