Evaluation of my kampung my future program effectiveness based on CIPP model

Fatin Nur Aqmar Ishak

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
Main Author :	Fatin Nur Aqmar Ishak
Additional Authors :	Ridzwan Che’ Rus Shafril Izham Mohd Aminudin
Title :	Evaluation of my kampung my future program effectiveness based on CIPP model

Place of Production :	HRMARS
Year of Publication :	2017

Abstract :

The agriculture sector is making a name in the economic sector of a country. Hence, it enables to improve the standard of living of the community and becomes the largest contributor to the production of food. This article discusses the evaluation of My Kampung My Future (MKMF) program based on the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process and Product) performed as an effort to ensure its effectiveness and smoothness in the future. The program is able to attract more youths to venture into the agricultural sector. At the same time, it is capable of upholding the agricultural sector around the world. Therefore, the MKMF program aims to reduce the percentage of unemployment among youths who are also the most needed human capital in advancing the country's economy

References

1. Abdul Rasid, A. R., Nurul Ikhwan, R., Ahmad, E., Jamaludin, H., & Mohd Zaid, M. (2009).Pengaruh subjek pertanian dalam membina minat pelajar terhadap kerjaya dalam bidang pertanian: Kajian kes di Sekolah Menengah Teknik. Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional Kali ke-3, 2009, 9-10 Disember 2009, UTM Skudai,Johor Bahru. 2. Alkin, M. C. (2004). Evaluation roots: Tracking theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 3. Azman, H., Sharifah Nurulhuda, T. M. Y., & Mohd Fauzi, M. Y. (2015). A conceptual framework for mechatronics curriculum using Stufflebeam CIPP Evaluation Model. World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Enterpreneurship. Elsevier Science Ltd. 4. Bezu, S., & Holden, S. (2014). Are rural youth in Ethiopia abonding agriculture? World Department. Science Direct Article. Volume 64, December 2015, 259-272. Elsevier Science. Ltd. 5. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2003). The students evaluation standards. Thousand Oaks. CA: Crown Press. 6. Ministry of Agriculture (MOA). (2012). Program My Kampung My Future (MKMF). Ministry of Agriculture (MOA). (2016). Karnival MAHA 2016. 7. Mohd Nordin, A. B. (2011). Penilaian program Mata Pelajaran Vokasional (MPV) bagi bidang pertanian di sekolah menengah harian di Semenanjung Malaysia. Phd Thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 8. Noorfazreen, M. N., & Asmak, A. R. (2011). Pelaksanaan Dasar Sekuriti Makanan di Malaysia: Kajian daripada perspektif ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Syariah, Jilid 19, Bilangan: 1, 2011, 39-62. 9. Norhasni, Z. A., Mohd Asraff, M. A., & Anzar, A. (2015). Penglibatan belia dalam pertanian komersial dan perkembangan industri pertanian di Malaysia. South-East Asian Journal for Youth, Sports and Health Education, 1(1), April 2015. 10. Stufflebeam, D.L. (1971). The use of experimental design in educational evaluation. Journal of Educational Measurement. 11. Stufflebeam, D.L. (2004). The 21st - Century CIPP Model: Origins, development and use. In M. C. 12. Alkin (Ed.). Evaluation roots. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 13. Stufflebeam, D.L. (2005). CIPP model (context, input, process, and product). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. 14. Stufflebeam, D.L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page