UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| The purpose of this study was to investigate whether inner speech instruction had any significant effect on upper-intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension. To this end, 60 female subjects participated in this study and were assigned to the experimental and control groups each consisting of 30 participants. The same teaching materials comprising twelve reading texts were taught to both groups through a 10-session treatment with a difference in the procedure during which the experimental group underwent an inner speech instruction while the control group did not receive such an instruction. Results of paired samples t-test indicated the effectiveness of inner speech instruction in the experimental group. Moreover, the interview analysis revealed that the visual and auditory learners preferred to visualize and hear voices while completing the task and developing a positive perception towards the use of inner speech as a tool to enhance their reading ability. It is assumed that applying inner mental self-speech instruction in a social context of classroom leads learners to move from inter-psychological to intrapsychological functioning in order to modify their current developed ability to higher cognitive performance. |
| References |
1. Abadikhah, S., & Khorshidi, A. (2013). An investigation of the private speech in the collaborative interaction of Iranian adult EFL Learners. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(3), 71 – 85. 2. Abdollahi, H., & Tahriri, A. (2012). The relationship between learning styles and vocabulary recall of EFL learners. Iranian EFL Journal. 8(6). 11-27. 3. Aliakbari M. & Abol-Nejadian, R. (2013). Trait emotional intelligence and learning styles: the case of Iranian English for Academic Purposes Learners. Educational Psychology. 35(7), 779-793. 4. Best, J. W. (2006). Research in education (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson. 5. Buckwalter, P. (2001). Repair sequences in Spanish L2 dyadic discourse: A descriptive study. The Modern Language Journal. 85(3), 380–397. 6. Claxton, C., & Murrel, P. (1987). Learning styles: implications for improving education practices. ASHE-ERIC Higher education.1-16. 7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsday, N. J., Erlbaum. 8. DiCamilla, F.J., & Anton, M. (2004). Private speech: A study of language for thought in the collaborative interaction of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 36-69. 9. Dorneyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10. Frawley, W. & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). L2 discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 19–44. 11. Frawley, W. (1997). Vygotsky and cognitive science. Language and the unification of the social and computational mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 12. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York. United Sates of America. Cambridge University Press. 13. Guerrero, M. C. M. (2005). Inner Speech—L2: Thinking words in a second language. New York: Springer. 14. Keefe, J., & Ferrell, B. (1990). Developing a defensible learning style paradigm. Educational leadership, 48(2), 57-61. 15. Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J.W. Keefe (Ed.), Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing And Prescribing Programs (pp.1-17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals. 16. Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, N. J: Ablex. 17. Mcchlery, S. & Visser, S. (2009). A comparative analysis of the learning styles of accounting students in the United Kingdom and South Africa. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 14(3), 299-315. 18. McCafferty, S.G. (1992). The use of private speech by adult second language learners: A cross-cultural study. The Modern Language journal, 76(2), 179-189. 19. Oxford, R. (1995). Gender differences in learning styles: What do they mean? In J. M .Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp.34-40). Boston: Heinle and Heinle. 20. Oxford, R. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 21. Platt, E. & Brooks, F.B. (1994). The acquisition-rich environment revisited. The Modern Language Journal. 78(4), 497-511. 22. Putinseva, P. (2006). The importance of learning styles in ESL/EFL. The Internet TESL Journal. 12(3). 23. Reid, J.M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL classroom. Boston: Heinleand Heinle. 24. Ruxton, G. D. (2006). The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to student's t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Behavioral Ecology. 17, 688–690. 25. Sadler‐Smith, E. (2010). ‘Learning Style’: frameworks and instruments. Educational Psychology. 17(1), 51-63. 26. Saville-Troike, M. (1988). Private speech: Evidence for second language learning -strategies during the silent period. Journal of Child Language. 15(3), 567–90. 27. Tahmasebi, S. & Yamini, M. (2011). Linking task-based language teaching and sociocultural theory: Private speech and scaffolding in reading comprehension. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies. 2(1), 41-55. 28. Upton, T. A. & Lee-Thompson, L. (2001). The role of the first language in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 469-495. 29. Villamil, O. & DeGuerrero, M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing. 5(1), 51–75. 30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press. 31. Williams, B., Brown, T. & Etherington, J. (2012). Learning styles Preferences of Undergraduate Social Work Students. Social Work Education, 32, 972-990. 32. Winsler, A.; Diaz, R. & Montero, I. (1997). The role of private speech in the transition from collaborative to independent task performance in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 12(1), 59-79. 33. Winsler, A.; L. Manfra & Diaz, R. (2007). Should I let them talk: Private speech and task performance among preschool children with and without behavior problems. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 22, 215-231. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |