Exploring discourse patterns in literature circles

Ho, Lai Ying

Abstract

This study explores the discourse patterns produced by a group of ESL students and the roles played by the group discussion leaders in literature circles that effectively enhance their comprehension of the stories in graphic and non-graphic novels. Six ESL students were selected in this study and seven literature circles were conducted to gather data to address the research questions. Data were gathered from direct observation, interviews and transcripts of literature circles. The data obtained from the transcripts of literature circles showed that the students used different comprehension strategies during discussions such as questioning, evaluating, using prior knowledge, interpreting and summarising that effectively enhance their understanding of the texts. Turn-taking in discussions also showed that students with better language proficiency in English language dominated the discussions and could comprehend the stories more effectively. Data collected from the transcripts of the students’ participation in literature circles and direct observation showed that the group discussion leader played an important role in assisting the group members to understand the graphic and non-graphic novels by paraphrasing the questions asked, initiating the conversation and motivating quiet group members to give personal responses and opinions during the discussions. Discourse patterns produced by the students and the group discussion leaders’ roles in literature circles were analysed as to determine whether literature circles assisted the students in comprehending the graphic and non-graphic novels. The findings help teachers to improve literature circles as they know the important aspects in literature circles that should be emphasised to enhance students’ comprehension.

References

1. Brown, R., & Dewitz, P. (2014). Building comprehension in every classroom: Instruction with literature, informational texts, and basal programs. New York: The Guilford Press. 2. Certo, J., Moxley, K., Reffitt, K., & Miller, J. A. (2010). I learned how to talk about a book: Children’s perceptions of literature circles across grade and ability levels. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 243-263. doi:10.1080/19388070902947352 3. Clark, K. F. (2009). The nature and influence of comprehension strategy use during peer-led literature discussions: An analysis of intermediate grade students’ practice. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 95-119. doi:10.1080/19388070802226295 4. Clarke, L. W. (2007). Discussing Shiloh: A conversation beyond the book. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(2), 112-122. doi:10.1598/JAAL.51.2.3 5. Cook, M. P. (2017). Now I “see”: The impact of graphic novels on reading comprehension in high school English classrooms. Literacy Research and Instruction, 56(1), 21-53. doi:10.1080/19388071.2016.1244869 6. Daniels, H. (1994). Literature circles: Voice and choice in the student-centered classroom. York, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers. 7. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). New York: Longman. 8. Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. 9. Furr, M. (2003). Literature circles for the EFL classroom. Proceedings of the 2003 TESOL Arabia Conference. 10. Retrieved from http://www.eflliteraturecircles.com/litcirclesforEFL.pdf 11. Helgeson, J. (2017). Differentiating through literature circles. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 53(1), 41-44. doi: 10.1080/00228958.2016.126481 12. Jennings, K. A., Rule, A. C., & Zanden, S. M. V. (2014). Fifth graders’ enjoyment, interest, and comprehension of graphic novels compared to heavily-illustrated and traditional novels. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 257-274. Retrieved from 13. http://www.iejee.com/6_2_2014/IEJEE_6_2_Jennings_Rule_Zanden.pdf 14. Ketch, A. (2005). Conversation: The comprehension connection. The Reading Teacher, 59(1), 8-13. doi:10.1598/RT.59.1.2 15. Kim, M. (2004). Literature discussions in adult L2 learning. Language and Education, 18(2), 145-165. doi: 10.1080/09500780408666872 16. Kintsch, W., & Kintsch, E. (2005). Comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp.71-92). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 17. Kummert, N. (2014). Supporting English language learners with literature circles. Curriculum In Context, 6, 22-24. 18. Retrieved from http://wsascd.org/downloads/curriculum_in_context/Spring_2014_Articles 19. Mahdavi, J. N., & Tensfeldt, L. (2013). Untangling reading comprehension strategy instruction: Assisting struggling readers in the primary grades. Preventing School Failure, 57(2), 77-92. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2012.668576 20. Maloch, B., & Beutel, D. D. (2009). “Big loud voice. You have important things to say”: The nature of students initiations during one teacher’s interactive read-alouds. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 45(2), 20-29.Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 23870348 21. Maroni, B., Gnisci, A., & Pontecorvo, C. (2008). Turn-taking in classroom interactions: Overlapping, interruptions and pauses in primary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 59-76. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23421618 22. McCall, A. L. (2010). Teaching powerful social studies ideas through literature circles. The Social Studies, 101(4), 152-159. doi: 10.1080/00377990903284104 23. McLaughlin, M. (2012). Reading comprehension: What every teacher needs to know. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 432-440. doi: 10.1002/TRTR.01064 24. Mohamed Elhess., & Egbert, J. (2015). Literature circles as support for language development. English Teaching Forum, 13-21. Retrieved from https://americanenglish.state.gov/files/ae/. source03_etf_53-3_3_elhess_egbert.pdf 25. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. 26. Scott, J. E. (1994). Literature circles in the middle school classroom: Developing reading, responding, and responsibility. Middle School Journal, 26(2), 37-41. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23023959 27. Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The Kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360-363. Retrieved from http://virtualhost.cs.columbia.edu/~julia/courses/CS6998/Interrater_agreement.Kappa_statistic.pdf 28. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://www.corwin.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/24615_01_Wodak_Ch_01.pdf 29. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.