Effects of using media of chemondro and video conference on teaching learning towards students’ self-efficacy and students’ self-regulated learning on the subject of hydrocarbon (IR)

Nur Fitriyana

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	Q Science (General)
ISSN :	2289-7070
Main Author :	Nur Fitriyana
Additional Authors :	Ikhsan, Jaslin Wiyarsi, Antuni Sugiyarto, K.H.
Title :	Effects of using media of chemondro and video conference on teaching learning towards students’ self-efficacy and students’ self-regulated learning on the subject of hydrocarbon (IR)

Place of Production :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :	2018

Abstract :

This research aimed to analyze the effect of using media in the teaching learning toward the aspects of students’ selfefficacy and students’ self-regulated learning. The media used were chemondro and video conference on the subject of hydrocarbon. This research was set as a quasi-experimental post-test only design. The population was the students of 11 public senior high school in Purworejo regency, Central Java, Indonesia. The sampling technique was two steps of cluster random sampling. The samples of this study were the six eleventh grade students (the mean age was 16) in two public senior high school in those regency. The samples were classified into three classes depending the media used in the teaching learning, they are Class CG-2 using chemondro only, Class CG-1 using hybrid of video conference only, and Class E using both chemondro and video conference. The data of students’ self-efficacy and students’ self-regulated learning were collected through questionnaire for each class. The data are analyzed according to MANOVA method, and it was found that there are significantly differences among the three classes for both aspects.

References

1. Partridge, H., Ponting, D., & McCay, M. (2011). Australian Teaching and Learning Council. 81-85. 2. Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H., & Akay, H. (2011). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 28, 780-795. 3. Pandey, H., & Pande, P. (2014). International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 10(2), 308-311. 4. Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H., & Akay, H. (2011). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 780-795. 5. Bandura, A.(1994). Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4, 71-81. 6. Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2010). Educational Psychology. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. 7. Santrock, J. (2011). Educational Psychology. The MC Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. 8. Uzuntiryaki, E. (2008). Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 12-28. 9. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91. 10. Bahr, N., Carroll, A., & Gerard, E. (2013). Griffith Research Online, 13, 58-74. 11. Kitsantas, A. (2010). Hellenic Journal of Psychology,10, 48-59. 12. Virtanen, P., Nevgi, A., & Niemi, H. (2013). Study of the Learning Society, 3, 20-36. 13. Vrieling, E., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2012). Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 102-117. 2008 14. Zimmerman, B. J. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183. 15. Alqurashi, E. (2016). Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 9, 45-52. 16. Roblyer, M. (2006). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. 17. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy the exercise of control, W. H. Freeman and Company. 18. Temel, S. (2013). Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,4, 297-302.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page