Pre-service English teachers' reticent beliefs towards oral participation in EAP classrooms

Ruey, Shing Soo

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	P Philology. Linguistics
ISSN :	2243-7908
Main Author :	Ruey, Shing Soo
Additional Authors :	Hock, Seng Goh
Title :	Pre-service English teachers' reticent beliefs towards oral participation in EAP classrooms

Year of Publication :

2017

Abstract :

The purpose of this study was to investigate pre-service English teachers’ reticent beliefs towards oral participation in English for Academic Purpose classrooms. To this end, 144 Malaysian pre-service English teachers enrolled in a teacher-training programme participated as respondents in a survey conducted using the Reticent Belief Index. They were all diagnosed with high level of reticence prior to the study. In addition, 24 pre-service teachers, selected randomly from among the survey participants, took part in focus group discussions. The results of the study revealed that the majority of the pre-service English teachers subscribed to eight beliefs that are presumed to be associated with reticent behaviour. Additionally, a newly identified belief, ‘Kiasuim’ was also found to cause the pre-service teachers being reticent in the class. The results of the study point to the importance of alleviating pre-service teachers’ reticent behaviour via a remedial course which incorporates the elements of modifying reticent beliefs.

References

1. Baktash, F., & Chalak, A. (2016). The relationship between reticence and personality types in Iranian university EFL classrooms. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(5), 1000–1005. doi: 10.17507/tpls.0605.13. 2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 3. Chen, T. (2003). Reticence in class and on-line: Two ESL students’ experiences with communicative language teaching. System, 31(2), 259–281. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00024-1. 4. Cieniewicz, J. (2007). Participation blues from the student perspective. In M. Weimer (Ed.), Tips for encouraging student participation in classroom discussions (p. 5). Wisconsin: Magna Publications. 5. Corr, P. J. (2013). Approach and avoidance behaviour: Multiple systems and their interactions. Emotion Review, 5(3), 285–290. doi: 10.1177/1754073913477507. 6. De Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in social research (5th ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin. 7. Delima, E. M. (2012). A reticent student in the classroom: A consequence of the art of questioning. Asian EFL Journal, 60(May), 50–69. Retrieved from http://asian-efl-journal.com/. 8. Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (3rd ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press. 9. Dudley Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page