1. Alavi, S. M., Kaivanpanah, S. & Shabani, K. (2012). Group dynamic assessment: An inventory of mediational strategies for teaching listening. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3(4), 27-58. 2. Alderson J. C. (1990). Testing reading comprehension skills. Reading in a Foreign Language, 6(2). 425-438. 3. Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading.UK: Cambridge University Press. 4. Alderson, J.C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London/New York Press. 5. Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (2014). Towards a theory of diagnosis in second and foreign language assessment: Insights from professional practice across diverse fields. Applied Linguistics 1-25. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt046. 6. Anderson, N. J., Bachman, L., Perkins, K., & Cohen, A. (1991). An exploratory study into the construct validity of a reading comprehension test: Triangulation of data sources.Language Testing,8(1), 41-66. 7. Bachman, L. F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts. Language testing, 17(1), 1-42. 8. Badrasawi, K. J. I., Kassim, N. L. A. & Daud, N. M. (2017). The effects of test characteristics on the hierarchical order of reading skills. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 14(1), 63-82. 9. Baird, J., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Newton, P., Stobart, G. & Steen-Utheim, A.T. (2014). Assessment and learning: State of the field review. Oslo: Knowledge Centre for Education. 10. Baily, K.M. (1999). Washback in language testing. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey. 11. Berg, B.L. (2004). Qualitative research methods. Boston: Pearson Press. 12. Brown, J.D. (2005). Testing in language programs. Prentice Hall. 13. Cauley, K. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2010). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement.The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas,83(1), 1-6. 14. Doe, C. D. (2013). Validating the Canadian Academic English Language Assessment for diagnostic purposes from three perspectives: Scoring, teaching, and learning (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Queen’s University:‏Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 15. Doe, C. (2015). Student interpretations of diagnostic feedback. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(1), 110-135. 16. Farhady, H., Jafarpour, A., & Birjandi, P. (2009). Testing language skills. Tehran: SAMT Publishers. 17. Gallagher, N. (2000). DELTA’s key to the TOEFL test. McHenry, IL: Delta. 18. Gibbs, G. & D. Simpson, C. (2004-05). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31. 19. Gipps, C. V. (1994).Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. Psychology Press. 20. Gu, Z. (2011). Maximizing the potential of multiple-choice items for cognitive diagnostic assessment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto. 21. Gu, L. (2014). At the interface between language testing and second language acquisition: Language ability and context of learning. Language Testing, 31(1), 111-133. 22. Hancock, C. R. (1994). Alternative assessment and second language study: What and why. Eric Documents: ED376695. 23. Harding, L., Alderson, J. C., & Brunfaut, T. (2015). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign language: Elaborating on diagnostic principles. Language Testing, 32(3) 317-336. 24. Herna´ndez, R. (2008). The challenges of engaging students with feedback. Paper presented at the 4th Biennial EARLI/Northumbria Assessment Conference, 27–29. August, postdam/Berlin. 25. Hernández, R. (2012). Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning?Higher Education,64(4), 489-502. 26. Huff, K., & Goodman, D. P. (2007).The demand for cognitive diagnostic assessment. In J. P. Leighton & M. J. Gierl (Eds.), Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education. 19-60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 27. Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 28. Hughes, G. (2011). Towards a personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education.Studies in Higher Education,36(3), 353-367. 29. Jang, E. E. (2005). A validity narrative: Effects of reading skills diagnosis on teaching and learning in the context of NG-TOEFL (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL. 30. Jang, E. E. (2008). A framework for cognitive diagnostic assessment. In C. A. Chappelle, Y.-R. Chung, & J. Xu (Eds.), Towards adaptive CALL: Natural language processing for diagnostic language assessment (pp. 117-131). Ames, IA: Iowa State University. 31. Jang, E. E. (2009). Demystifying a Q-matrix for making diagnostic inferences about L2 reading skills. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(3), 210-238.‏ 32. Jang, E. E., & Wagner, M. (2014). Diagnostic feedback in language classroom. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Companion to language assessment (pp. 693-711). Wiley-Blackwell. 33. Kiani, G. R., Alibakhshi, G., Akbari, R. (2009). On the consequential validity of ESP tests: A qualitative study in Iran. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 103-126 34. Kim, H. S. J. (2011). Diagnosing examinees' attributes-mastery using the Bayesian inference for binomial proportion: A new method for cognitive diagnostic assessment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia Tech University. 35. Lee, Y. W., & Sawaki, Y. (2009). Application of three cognitive diagnosis models to ESL reading and listening assessments. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(3), 239-263.‏ 36. Lee, Y. W. (2015). Diagnosing diagnostic language assessment. Language Testing, 32(3), 299-316. 37. Liu, H. H. T. (2014). The conceptualization and operationalization of diagnostic testing in second and foreign language assessment. Teachers College. Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 1-12. 38. Lougheed, L. (2003). How to prepare for the TOEFL test. Hauppauge, NY: Barron. 39. McNamara, T. (2006). Validity in language testing: The challenge of Sam Messick's legacy. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 3(1), 31-51. 40. McCann, T., & Clark, E. (2003). Grounded theory in nursing research: Part 2—Critique. Nurse Researcher, 11(2), 19-28. 41. McDowell, L., K. Sambell, V. Bazin, R. Penlington, D. Wakelin, H. Wickes, & J. Smailes (2005). Assessment for learning: Current practice exemplars from the Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. Newcastle: Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. University of Northumbria. 42. Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241-256. ‏ 43. Moss, C. M. (2013). Research on classroom summative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Handbook of research on classroom assessment(pp. 235–255). Los Angeles: Sage. 44. Nation, P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. New York, NY: Routledge. 45. Ozuru, Y., Rowe, M., O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Where’s the difficulty in standardized reading tests: The passage or the question? Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1001-1015. 46. Ravand, H., Barati, H., &Widhiarso, W. (2013). Exploring diagnostic capacity of a high Stakes reading comprehension test: A pedagogical demonstration. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 3(1), 12-37.‏ 47. Rost, D. (1993). Assessing the different components of reading comprehension: Fact or fiction? Language Testing, 10(1), 79-82. 48. Rupp, A. A., Ferne, T., & Choi, H. (2006). How assessing reading comprehension with multiple-choice questions shapes the construct: A cognitive processing perspective.Language testing,23(4), 441-474. 49. Rymniak, M. & Shanks, J. (2002). TOEFL CBT exam. New York: Kaplan. 50. Spolsky, B. (1990). Social Aspects of Individual Assessment. In de Jong, John H.A.L., & Stevenson, D.K. (Eds.), Individualizing the Assessment of Language Abilities, 3-15. Clevedon, Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd. 51. Sullivan, P.N., Brenner, G.A. & Zhong, G.L.Q. (2004). Master the TOEFL 2005. Lawrenceville, NJ: Thomson/Peterson. 52. Trotter, E. (2006). Student perceptions of continuous summative assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(5), 505-521.