Does the less developed states in Malaysia catching-up to the richer state of Selangor?

Muzafar Shah Habibullah

Abstract

Malaysia is targeting to becoming a develop nation by 2020. However, income disparity between the developed and less developed states in Malaysia has persisted for more than 50 years without any sign of narrowing the gap in the future. Despite the various Malaysia Development Plans for the past several decades, regional disparity between states remains. Thus, the objective of the present paper is to address the question whether the less developed states, namely; Kedah, Kelantan, Pahang, Perlis, Sabah, Sarawak and Terengganu are catching-up with the more richer state of Selangor. Using annual data for the period 1970 to 2013, by employing the error-correction model our results suggests that there is cointegration and thus, imply convergence between less developed states and Selangor. Our catch-up analyses suggest that there is narrowing of disparity between Selangor and the less developed states. In this respect, the state government has an important role to play in enhancing growth by continuously providing stable economic environment for investment and other productive economic activities. This will ensure full convergence can take place at a faster rate in the future.

References

1. Aslam, M. and Hassan, A.A.G. (2003). Development planning and regional imbalances in Malaysia. FEA Working Paper No. 2003-5. Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaysia, Malaysia. 2. Bernard, A.B., and Durlauf, S.N. (1995). Convergence in international output. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10, 97-108. 3. Bernard, A.B., and Durlauf, S.N. (1996). Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. Journal of Econometrics, 71, 161-173. 4. Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431. 5. Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1057-1077. 6. Ghani, J.A. (2014). Market preserving federalism: Implications for Malaysia. Unpublished PhD thesis. Victoria University, Australia. 7. Halmai, P. and Vasary, V. (2010). Real convergence in the new EU member states of the European Union (shorter and longer term prospects). The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 7(1), 229-253. 8. Leete, R. (2007). Malaysia: From Kampong to Twin Towers. Shah Alam: Oxford Fajar Sdn Bhd. 9. MacKinnon, J.G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 601-618. 10. Narayan, P.K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37, 1979-1990. 11. Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R.J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326. 12. Roslan, A.H. (2008). The spatial distribution of poverty in Malaysia. Journal of Population and Social Studies, 17(1), 77-91. 13. Shamsulbahriah, K., Rodrigo, A. and Mansor, N. (2013). Narrowing disparities via the new economic model (NEM): Is Malaysia set to excel beyond its MDGs targets MDGs. In A. Singh, E.T. Gonzalez and S.B. Thomson (Eds.). Millennium Development Goals and Community Initiatives in the Asia Pacific. New Delhi: Springer India. pp. 11-33. 14. Shari, I. (2000). Economic growth and income inequality in Malaysia, 1971-95. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 5(1/2), 112-124. 15. Sundaram, J.K. and Hui, W.C. (2014). Malaysia@50: Economic Development, Distribution, Disparities. Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre. 16. Sopek, P. (2013). Real convergence of EU-27 and Croatia in the period 1995-2017. Paper presented at The 8th Young Economists’ Seminar to 19th Dubrovnik Conference. Organised by Croatian National Bank. Dubrovnik. June 12, 2013.