UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| In general, this study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Bachelor's Degree in Islamic Education Teachers Programme (IETP) in providing Islamic Education Teachers (IET) in schools in Malaysia. Assessment is based on Kirkpatrick's evaluation model which consists of four levels:reaction, learning, behavior, and result. The discussion focuses on four levels of assessment: reaction involving satisfaction, learning to involve knowledge, skills, and attitudes, behaviour that involve individual performance and result involving organizational performance. Hence, this study is conducted with the aim of identifying the extent to which the IETP operated at public universities and teacher education institutes towards producing competent and effective IET |
| References |
1. Ahmad, A., & Zahari, N. (2012). Kajian Keberkesanan Program Pembangunan Dan Penilaian Bagi Pegawai Perkhidmatan Tadbir Dan Diplomatik (PTD) Gred M41. Jurnal Pengurusan Awam, 9(2), 17-31. 2. Ahmad, L.H. (2014). Persepsi Pelajar Terhadap Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam Politeknik Dalam Pembentukan Sahsiah Muslim. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 39(2), 133-140. 3. Ali, A.M., Thuaibah, Omar, R., Zip, N.E.M., Ismail, N.S., & Zulkifli, T. (2009). Keberkesanan Latihan Di Kalangan Kakitangan Kumpulan Sokongan Di Pejabat Setiausaha Kerajaan Negeri Kedah, Darul Aman. In Amalan Latihan Dan Pembangunan Sumber Manusia Di Malaysia. Skudai: Penerbit Utm Press. 4. Bagiyono. (2012). Evaluasi Pelatihan Teknik Mengajar Berdasarkan Model Empat Level Evaluasi Pelatihan Kirkpatrick. In Seminar Nasional Viii Sdm Teknologi Nuklir. Yogyakarta 5. Che Noh, M.A., Razak, K.A., & Kasim, A.Y. (2015). Islamic Education Based On Quran And Sunna During Prophet Muhammad’s Era And Its Relationship With Teenagers’ Moral Formation.Procedia Computer Science,1(2), 93-101. 6. Farjad, S. (2012). The Evaluation Effectiveness Of Training Courses In University By Kirkpatrick Model (Case Study: Islamshahr Univeristy). Procedia Social And Behavioural Science, 46, 2837–2841. 7. Ghani, H.M.A., Shaik, S.A., Khamis, N., Al-Drees, A.M.A., Irshad, M., Khalil, M.S., Al-Haqwi, A.I., & Isnani, A. (2014). Research Methodology Workshops Evaluation Using The Kirkpatrick’s Model:Translating Theory Into Practice. Medical Teacher, 36, 24–S29. 8. Haris, Z., & Kassim, M.K.A. (2015). Pendidikan Islam Kursus Perguruan Lepas Ijazah Di Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia: Kaedah Dan Proses Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Yang Berkesan.Atikan, 1(2). 9. Ilias, M.F., Abdullah, M., Husain, K., Jasmi, K.A., Abdullah, A.H., & Rosman, A.S. (2016). JenisJenis Sumber Pengetahuan Guru Pendidikan Islam Dalam Penggunaan Bahan Bantu Mengajar DiSekolah Bestari. E-Jurnal Penyelidikan Dan Inovasi Edisi Khas,3(2), 41 – 55. 10. Ismail, A., Mohamed, R., & Ahmad, S. (2011). Kajian penilaian keberkesanan latihan ISM kepada pegawai JKM. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Sosial Malaysia. 11. Ismail, A.M., Stapa, Z., Othman, M.Y., Yaacob, M. (2012). Islam Dalam Pendidikan Dan Hubungannya Dengan Pembentukan Jati Diri Bangsa Melayu Di Malaysia. Jurnal Hadhari Special Edition, 37-50. 12. Jaafar, M.M., Tamuri, A.H., & Ya, R. (2012). Konsep Berilmu Di Kalangan Guru Pendidikan Islam Satu Keperluan Dalam Membangunkan Modal Insan. In International Seminar On Teacher And Islamic Education. Johor Bahru. 13. Jasmi, K.A., & Tamuri, A.H. (2007). Pendidikan Islam: Kaedah pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 14. JNJK. (2010). Standard kualiti pendidikan Malaysia. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 15. Kirkpatrick, J.D. & Kirkpatrick, W.K. (2016). Based on the groudbreaking work of Donald L.Kirkpatrick: Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Alexandria, USA: ATD Press. 16. Luneto, B. (2015). Profesionalisme Guru Dalam Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 38-49. 17. Manan, K.A., Md Nor, S., & Omar, B. (2013). Model Penilaian Kirkpatrick: Mengkaji Pengaruh Komunikasi Terhadap Keberkesanan Latihan. Malaysian Journal Of Communication, 29(2), 31-50. 18. Muhammad, A., Abdullah, A.H., Suratman, A.S., Jasmi, K.A., & Mustari, M.I. (2007). Tahap profesionalisme guru-guru pelatih Pendidikan Islam dalam latihan praktikum. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 19. Paull, M., Whitsed, C. & Girardi, A. (2016). Applying The Kirkpatrick Model: Evaluating An Interaction For Learning Framework Curriculum Intervention. Issues in Educational Research,26(3), 490. 20. Praslova, L. (2010). Adaptation Of Kirkpatrick’s Four Level Model Of Training Criteria To Assessment Of Learning Outcomes And Program Evaluation In Higher Education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation And Accountability, 22, 215–225. 21. Suhid, A., & Fakhruddin, F.M. (2012). Gagasan Pemikiran Falsafah Dalam Pendidikan Islam: Hala Tuju Dan Cabaran. Journal Of Islamic And Arabic Education, 4(2), 57-70. 22. Suhid, A., Ahmad, A.M., Sabri, S.M., & Mohamad, A.E. (2015). Pendidikan Untuk Semua:Amalannya Dalam Sistem Pendidikan Islam Di Malaysia. International Journal Of Education And Training, 1(2), 1-7. 23. Taat, M.S., & Abdullah, M.Y. (2014). Impak Pengajaran Dan Bimbingan Guru Pendidikan Islam Terhadap Motivasi Dan Pembelajaran Terarah Kendiri Pelajar. Journal For Educational Thinkers,5, 1-17. 24. Tamuri, A.B., Ismail, M.F., & Jasmi, K.A. (2012). Komponen Asas Untuk Latihan Guru Pendidikan Islam. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 2(2), 53-63. 25. Ulwan, A.N. (1997), Tarbiyyatul awlad fi al-Islam. Cairo: Maktabah Darussalam 26. Yusoff, M.A.M., Ahmad, J., Mansor, A.N., Johari, R., Othman, K., & Hassan, N.C. (2016). Evaluation Of School Based Assessment Teacher Training Programme. Creative Education, 7, 627-638 |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |