|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| The case study aimed to explore and explain the issues and challenges experienced in the management of curriculum change in primary schools. This was done by analysing the management of curriculum change brought about by the introduction the History curriculum for the Year Four Primary Schools Standard based Curriculum. This case study used a descriptive- interpretative approach grounded in the qualitative research tradition. Precisely, it is an instrumental case study. Data was collected through analysis of documents, in-depth interviewing (based on semi-structured interviews) and the direct observations of learning and teaching of History lessons. It was located within the context of eight selected schools (four National Primary Schools and four Tamil Type National Primary schools). A total of twenty eight respondents were interviewed. The findings show that the respondents did face issues and challenges in managing the Year Four History curriculum. They were pertaining to curriculum content, teaching and learning process, assessment, availability and utilization of time, training and staff development, physical facilities. The findings of this study can assist curriculum developers, curriculum administrators, school management team and teachers in improving quality of primary school curriculum change management. |
| References |
1. Blenkin, G. M., Edwards, G. & Kelly, A.V. (1992). Change and the Curriculum. London: Paul Chapman. 2. Bernstein, B. (2003). Class codes and control, towards a theory of educational transmissions (3rd ed.). London: Psychology Press. 3. Hibbard, L., Leonard, R. & Pai, A. (2015, November 2015). Curriculum Design for Equity and Excellence, presented at Advancing Social Justice from Classroom to Community, New York University. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305280544. 4. Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586-614. Retrived from https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21378. 5. Ljubojevic, M., Vaskovic, V., Stankovic, S., & Vaskovic, J. (2014). Using supplementary video in multimedia instruction as a teaching tool to increase efficiency of learning and quality of experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org /index.php/irrodl/ article/view/1825. 6. Majoni, C. (2017). Curriculum Overload and its Implication on Teacher Effectiveness in Primary Schools. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(3), 155-162. Retrieved from https://oapub.org/ edu/index. php/ ejes/article/view/516/1418 . 7. Ministry of Education of Malaysia. (1988). Cabinet Committee Report on the Review of the Implementation of The Education Policy. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia. 8. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2010). Explanations Book for Standard Based Primary School Curriculum. Putrajaya: Curriculum Development Division. 9. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Early Report Malaysia’s Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. 10. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Curriculum and Assessment Standard Documents Year Four History Subject. Putrajaya: Curriculum Development Division. 11. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2014). Higher Order Thinking Skills. Application in Schools. Putrajaya: Curriculum Development Division. 12. Nor Haslynda Abdul Rahman. (2014). From Curriculum Reform to Classroom Practice: An Evaluation of the English Primary Curriculum in Malaysia (Doctoral Thesis). United Kingdom: University of York. 13. Ratnavadivel, N. (1995). The Management of Innovation: An evaluation of curriculum change in Malaysian Teacher Education (Doctorol Thesis). United Kingdom: University of East Anglia. (n.published) 14. Stake, R.E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68 (7), 523-540. 15. Stabback, P. (2015). What makes a Quality Curriculum. In Progress Reflection, (2), 1-41. Retrived from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002439/243975e.pdf. 16. Stenhouse. (1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann 17. Walker, C.T. (2016). Investigating The Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Outdoor Education Teachers (Doctoral Dissertation). Australia: University of Tasmania. Retrieved from https://eprints.utas.edu.au/23538/. 18. William, F.O., Yahaya, L., & Owolabi, H. (2018). Teachers Knowledge Indices s Predictors of Secondary School Student’s Academic Achievement in Kwara State, Nigeria. Journal of Education, 6(1), 73-90. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1172016.pdf. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |