Keberkesanan pendekatan model bar dalam penyelesaian masalah berayat Matematik operasi tolak tahun empat

Yap, Ji Lin

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	LB Theory and practice of education
ISSN :	2232-0393
Main Author :	Yap, Ji Lin
Additional Authors :	Siti Rahaimah Ali
Title :	Keberkesanan pendekatan model bar dalam penyelesaian masalah berayat Matematik operasi tolak tahun empat

Place of Production :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :	2018

Abstract :

Kajian tindakan ini dijalankan bertujuan untuk meninjau pelaksanaan pendekatan kaedah model bar dalam penyelesaian masalah berayat operasi tolak dalam kalangan murid Tahun Empat di daerah Seremban, Negeri Sembilan dalam menyelesaikan masalah operasi tolak. Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengenalpasti pelaksanaan kaedah model bar dalam meningkatkan pencapaian murid dalam penyelesaian masalah berayat Matematik operasi tolak dan sejauh mana kaedah bar model menaik minat murid dalam menjawab soalan penyelesaian masalah berayat Matematik operasi tolak. Metodologi kajian ini menggunakan kajian tindakan yang mengaplikasikan model Kemmis & Mctaggart (1988). Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam kajian ini ialah Ujian Pra, Ujian Pasca 1 dan Ujian Pasca 2 digunakan untuk membandingkan pencapaian murid sebelum dan selepas diajar pendekatan model bar. Borang soal selidik juga digunakan untuk mengetahui perasaan dan tahap minat murid terhadap penggunaan kaedah model bar. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan 100% berjaya mencapai tahap minimum dalam Ujian Pasca 2. Tahap minat murid terhadap kaedah model bar meningkat lebih daripada 50% dari segi kefahaman dan pengaplikasian kaedah model bar.

References

1. Baker, W., Dickieson, J., Wulfeck, W., O’ Neil, H. F. (2011). Assessment of Problem Solving Using Simulations. New York: Routledge. 2. Chew C. M., Noraini Idris & Leong K. E.(2014). Secondary Students’ Perceptions of Assessments in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 10(3), 209- 227. 3. Cohen. H & Stemmer B. (2007). Consciousness and Cognition: Fragments of Mind and Brain. London: Elsevier Ltd. 4. Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (2013), Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Putrajaya. 5. Education Commission of the States. ECS (2004). ECS report to the nation: state implementation of the no child left behind act. Denver, Col. Available online at www.ecs.org/NCLB. 6. Flores, M. M. (2010). Using the Concrete- Respresentational- Abstract Sequence to Teach Subtraction With Regrouping to Students at Risk for Failure. Remedial and Special Education (Vol 31, No 3), Auburn University, Alabama, 195-207. 7. Kaur, J & Lee N. H (2017) Empowering Mathematics Learners Yearbook 2017, Asscociation of Mathematics Educators. United States of America: World Scientific Pubilishing Co.Pte.Ltd. 8. Kemmis, Stephen and Robin McTaggart (eds) 1988a The Action Research Planner. Deakin University, Australia: Deakin University opress (3rd edition). 9. Kemmis, Stephen and Robin McTaggart (eds) 1988b The Action Research Reader. Deakin University, Australia: Deakin University opress (3rd edition). 10. Kerlinger, F. N, Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Stamford: Wadsworth. 11. Lewis C.C, P. R. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: a theoritical model and North American case. Journal Mathematics Teacher Education 12, 285-304. 12. Matzin, E. S & Mundia, L. (2018). Effective Learning of Mathematics by Year 7 Students using the Bar Model Method: Case of Brunei Students. Journal of Studies in Education, (Vol.8, No.1), 1-16. 13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standard for school mathematics. USA: Reston, Va: NCTM. 14. Ozsoy G, K. H. (2015). Evaluation of Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Skills in Relation to Their Reading. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 8(1), 113-132. 15. Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (PPPM) (2023-2025) (2013), Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Putrajaya. 16. Salmi. H, V. M.-P. (2015). Mathematical thinking skills, self- concept and learning outcomes of 12 year olds visiting a Mathematics Science Centre Exhibition in Latvia and Sweden. Journal of Science Communication. 14 (04), 1-19. 17. Siti Rahaimah (2013) A Model to Identify the Level of Numeracy Understanding of Primary School Pupils: A Case Study. International Journal of Computer Applications (Vol. 67– No.5), 0975 – 8887. 18. Siti Rahaimah (2017). Analysis of Numerical Understanding Analysis for Primary School. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, (Vol. 7, No. 10), 713-728. 19. The Concise Oxford dictionary of current English (1995) 8th ed. / edited by R.E. Allen. Oxford, England : Clarendon Press ; New York : Oxford University Press, 1990. 20. TIMSS. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International mathematics report. Finding from IEA;s trends in International mathematics and science study at the fourth and eight grades. 21. TIMSS. (2011). Assessment Frameworks. TIMSS. 22. U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Guide to U.S. Department of Education programs. Washington, DC: Office of Communications and Outreach. 23. Walker, W., Bahr, M., Kenneth; Hampton, et al (2006). Creative Problem Solving for General Education Intervention Teams: A Two-Year Evaluation Study Remedial and Special Education, 1, 27-41. 24. Yeap, B. H. (2010). Improving Mathematical Thinking Through Assessment. Journal of Science and Mathematics, (Vol. 33, No. 2), 187-197. 25. Zakaria, N. N. (2016). Keupayaan Pelajar Dalam Menjana Masalah, Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematik dan Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Penyelesaian Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 4(1), 1-16.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page