UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
![]() |
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti kefahaman guru pelatih sains terhadap
elemen Pendidikan Sains Berasaskan Inkuiri atau Inquiry Based Science Education (IBSE) serta
mengkaji perbezaan kefahaman berdasarkan jantina, tahap pendidikan dan bidang pengkhususan guru
pelatih. Reka bentuk kuantitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif secara tinjauan digunakan bagi
menjawab persoalan dan menguji hipotesis dalam kajian ini. Pemilihan 365 orang responden kajian
berdasarkan Krejcie dan Morgan adalah daripada kalangan guru pelatih aliran sains di semester enam
dari Program Ijazah Sarjana Muda Pendidikan (Biologi, Kimia, Fizik dan Sains) dari tujuh buah
universiti awam di Malaysia secara pensampelan rawak berstrata.Kesahan instrumen yang digunakan
dalam kajian ini adalah melalui Analisis Kesahan Kandungan (I-CVI) yang mengandungi 40 item yang
mewakili tujuh elemen IBSE (Penyoalan, Penyiasatan Saintifik, Pengumpulan Data, Menganalisis Data,
Penerangan dan Kesimpulan, Penghujahan Berasaskan Bukti, Komunikasi Saintifik). Analisis deskriptif
digunakan bagi melihat min, kekerapan, peratusan dan sisihan piawai manakala statistik inferensi
menggunakan Ujian-t sampel bebas dan ANOVA bagi menguji hipotesis nul. Hasil analisis Ujian-t
mendapati terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan tentang kefahaman terhadap elemen IBSE antara guru
pelatih lelaki dengan guru pelatih perempuan terhadap kesemua elemen IBSE (t=11.6 dan p=0.018).
Kesimpulan daripada kajian ini menunjukkan kefahaman guru terhadap elemen IBSE adalah baik secara
keseluruhannya walau bagaimanapun kefahaman terhadap elemen Penyoalan adalah sederhana (min=3.58).
Implikasi kajian ini diharap dapat memberi panduan kepada pihak universiti dalam mengintegrasikan
elemen IBSE berdasarkan keperluan untuk menyokong ke arah pemantapan pendidikan inkuiri
kepada bakal-
bakal guru.
|
References |
AACTE. (2010). 21st Century Knowledge and Skills in Educator Preparation. American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education and the Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Pearson.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N.G., Mamlok-Naaman, R.Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397-419.
Abdul Halim Hamid. (2016). Tahap Kefahaman Guru Kolej Vokasional Terhadap Elemen Kurikulum Standard Kolej Vokasional.Tesis Sarjana.Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Abdul Rahim Abdul Rashid, (2005), Profesionalisme Keguruan: Prospek dan Cabaran, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2009). Pengajian Kurikulum. Edisi ke-2. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Abd Rahman Ismail (2003). Kefahaman Konsep Sains dan Perhubungannya dengan Tahap Kognitif dan Jantina Pelajar Tingkatan 3. Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Malaya.
Abrahams A, Millar R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. Int J Sci Educ 30(14):1945–1969.
Abrahams, I., & Saglam, M. (2010). A study of teachers’ views on practical work in secondary schools in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 753–768.
Abraham, M. (2010). The learning cycle approach as a strategy for instruction in science. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.) International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 513- 524). Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Abu Bakar Nordin.(1995). Penilaian afektif.Kajang:Masa Interprise.
Agensi Kelayakan Malaysia. (2010). Kod amalan akreditasi program. Petaling Jaya:Agensi Kelayakan Malaysia (Malaysian Qualifications Agency, MQA)
Ahmad Mahdzan Ayob. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan sosioekonomi (Edisi Ketiga). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Akademi Sains Malaysia.(2015). Penilaian Pelaksanaan Projek Rintis Pendidikan Sains Berasaskan Amalan Inkuiri di 4 buah sekolah rendah di Daerah Hulu Langat.Kuala Lumpur: Akademi Sains Malaysia.
Albaaly, I.(2012). The effectiveness of using Cyclic Inquiry Model (CIM) in developing some of science processes and the achievement in Science. Journal of Educational Research, 31(26), 259-283.
Albergaria-Almeida, P.(2010).Classroom questioning:Teachers'perceptions and practices. In Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol.2, pp.305-309).
Andrew J. Rotherham, & Daniel Willingham. (2009). 21st Century Skill. The Challenge a Head. University of Virginia, USA: Jossey-Bass.
Asariah Mior Shaharudin. (2009). The Next Generation of Teachers: The Malaysian perspective. 1-13.Putrajaya, Malaysia: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Atkin, J. M. & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery or Invention? The Science Teacher, 29(5), 45–51.
Awang Hadi Salleh. (1998). Latihan Perguruan untuk Sekolah Berkesan. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan JPPG, Pendidikan Guru untuk Sekolah Berkesan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
Awang Kasmurie Awang Kitot, Abdul Razak Ahmad & Ahmad Ali Seman. (2010). The effectiveness of inquiry teaching in enhancing student's critical thinking. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 7(C), 264-273.
Ayob, A. (2012). Cara Meningkatkan Minat Pelajar terhadap Sains dan Matematik. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Azizi Yahya et. al., (2007). Menguasai Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.
Azizi Yahya & Syazwani Abdul Razak. (2010). Teori Berkaitan Gaya Pembelajaran Dan Kaedah Pengajaran. Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM, Skudai Johor. Dirujuk Pada 14 Mac 2012 dari http://eprints.utm.my/10384/1/Teori_Gaya _Pembelajaran_Dan.pdf _Pembelajaran_Dan.pdf
Bahagian Pendidikan Guru .(2009). Garis Panduan Amalan Profesional PISMP. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pendidikan Guru.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah, 1–56. Retrieved from www.moe.gov.my.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah. Retrieved from www.moe.gov.my
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children. 46(2), 26-29.
Barell, J. (1991). Teaching for thoughtfulness: Classroom strategies to enhance intellectual development. New York: Longman.
Bass, E.J., Contant, L.T., & Carin, A.A. (2009). Methods for teaching science as inquiry. USA:Pearson Press.
Best, J .W., & Kahn, J.V.(2006). Research in education (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality learning at University. (2nd edition). UK:Open University Press.
Blackbourn, J.M., bunch, D., Fillingim, J., Thomas, C., Schillinger, D., & Dupree, J. (2011). Challenging orthodoxy: Problem based learning in preservice teacher training. Journal of Instructional Psycology, 38(3), 140-153.
Bloom, B., Englehart, M. Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.
Blueprint PPPM 2013-2025. (n.d.). Retrieved February, 2016, from http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint-BM.pdf
Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639- 669. 669.
Brook, J.G & Brook, M.G. (1993). In search for understanding: The case for constructivist classroom: Alexandria, VA: Association For supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Bybee, R., Taylor, J., Gardener, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, C. J.,Westbrook, A., & Landes, N.(2006). The BSCE 5e instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Retrieved from http :// bscs.org/sites/default/files/_legacy/BSCS_5E_Instructional_Model.htm
Capps, D.K., Crawford, B.A., & Constas, M.A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291-318.
Cecile, L. (2014) Gender and Types of Learning. The Huron University College Journal of Learning and Motivation: Vol. 52: Iss. 1, Article 4.
Chaffee, J.(1988). Thinking critically. Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin.
Chang, C.Y., & Wang, H.C.(2009). Issues of inquiry learning in digital learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 169-173.
Chernobilsky, E., DaCosta, M. C., & Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Learning to talk the educational psychology talk through a problem-based course. Instructional Science, 32(4), 319-356.
Chua Yan Piaw .(2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan: Kaedah Penyelidikan. Malaysia: Mc Graw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.
Chua Yan Piaw. (2011). Kaedah Penyelidikan , Buku 1, Edisi Kedua. Kuala Lumpur : Mc Graw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Clark.C. & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers’ Thought Processes. dalam Wittrock,M.C.(ed). Handbook of Research on Teaching, Edisi ke 3. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Coakes, J., Sheridan & Clara Ong. (2011). SPSS Version 18.0 for Windows, Analysis Without Anguish. McDougall Street, Milton: John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd. Ltd.
Creswell, J.W. (2005). Educational Research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 2nd Ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4 Ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
Daniel, E.G.S. (1999). Corak konsepsi pelajar bagi konsep pertumbuhan. Tesis Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.
Darling-Hammoud, L. (1990). Instructional Policy into Practice: The Power of the Bottom Over the Top. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 12: 233- 241.
Davis, L.L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5, 194–197.
Dick, W. (1997). Better instructional design theory : process improvement or engineering . Teaching technology, 37 (5), 47-50.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12. Ennis, R., 1998, Is critical thinking culturally biased? Teaching Philosophy, 21, 15-33 Fatin Aliah Phang & Nor Athirah Tahir. (2011).Kemahiran Proses Sains Dalam Kalangan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sains di UTM.Journal of Science and Mathematics Educational, 3, 123-133.
Fatin Aliah Phang. (2010). Implikasi pemansuhan PPSMI terhadap pengajaran dan pembelajaran di IPTA. Buletin Persatuan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Johor, 19(1), 75-83.
Fazio, X., Melville, W., & Bartley, A. (2010). The problematic nature of the practicum: A key determinant of pre-service teachers’ emerging inquiry-based science practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 665-681.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
Flowers, C. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of scores on the clinical experience rubric: A measure of dispositions for preservice teachers. Educational and Psycological Measurement, 66(3), 478-488.
Foster, H.L. (1995). Implementing innovative pedagogy in the first course in accounting and its relationship to student attitudes toward the profession. PhD.Thesis, Andrews University, USA.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta- analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82 (3), 300–329.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2006). Educational research: An introduction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W. Krajcik, J.S., fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922-939.
Gençi, M. (2015). The Effect of Scientific Studies on Students ’ Scientific Literacy and Attitude, (2004).
Goh, N. K., Toh, K. A., and Chia, L. S. (1989). Use of modified laboratory instruction for improving science process skills acquisition. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(5), 430-432
Hair, Jr. J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L.,& Black, W. C. (2003). Multivariate data analysis with readings(4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hairiah Munip & Chin Chee Keong. (2010). Tinjauan terhadap pencapaian kemahiran proses sains dalam kalangan guru pelatih PISMP. Jabatan Sains : Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Tuanku Bainun.
Hanafi Mahat, Zainudin Othman, Yazid Saleh, Mohmadisa Hashim, Adnan Jusoh, & Norazlan Hadi Yaacob. (2016). Keberkesanan kurikulum pendidikan sains sosial di Malaysia : Kajian perspektif guru siswazah dan pengetua sekolah di UPSI. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 1(1), 37–48.Hancock, E.,
Gallard, A. (2004). Preservice science teacher's belief about teaching and learning: The influence of K-12 field experiences. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 281-291.
Hanizah Misbah & Shaharom Noordin (2008). Tahap kefahaman kemahiran komunikasi dan mengeksperimen di kalangan pelajar tahun dua pendidikan fizik merentas program pengajian. Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik. 11-12 October, Skudai, Johor.
Hapgood, S., & Pallincsar, A.S. (2007). Where Literacy and Science Intersect. Education Leadership, 64 (4), 56-60.
Harlen, W., & Allende, J. (2008). Teacher Professional Development in Pre- Secondary School Inquiry-Based Science Education (IBSE). International Conference on Professional Development for IBSE in Pre-Secondary Education.
Harvey, O.J., Hunt, D.E., & Schroder, H.M. 1961. Conceptual systems and personality organizations. New York: Wiley.
Hasnira Embong, Kua Bee Hoon, H. M. Y. (2017). Bengkel Pemantapan Pendekatan Inkuiri: Meningkatkan Penggunaan Pendekatan Inkuiri Semasa Latihan Praktikum Fasa 2 dalam Kalangan Guru Pelatih Sains Pendidikan Rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dedikasi Jilid 12, 2017, 12, 20–37.
Hattie, J. 2003. Teachers Make a Difference What is the Research Evidence? Retrieved January 15, 2009 from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2251792/Teachers-Makea-Difference.
Heng, L. L., dan Johari Bin Surif (2013). Penghujahan Saintifik: Memahami Perlaksanaannya dalam Proses Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Teknologi (Social Sciences), 65(1), 1–8.
Hok Kiu Edward (2011). Gender differences in learning Mathematics in Hong Kong: PISA 2003 study (Disertasi tidak diterbitkan). University of Hong Kong.
https://laporan+perunding+kesterel+2011+kbat/Dicapai pada 17 November 2018
Ireland, J., Watters, J. J., & Brownlee, J. L. (2014). International Journal of Science Approaches to Inquiry Teaching : Elementary teacher's perspectives, (November), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.877618
Jaafar N & Tamuri A.H. (2013). Hubungan antara efikasi kendiri dengan kualiti guru Pendidikan Islam sekolah menengah kebangsaan Malaysia. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education. 5(1), 2013 41-60.
Jemaah Nazir & Jaminan Kualiti. (2010). Standard kualiti pendidikan Malaysia. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Johari Hassan & Yeong Wai Chung. (2010). Keupayaan dan Kelemahan Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematik Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Lima. Tesis Sarjana. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Johnson, R., B., & Christensen, L.B.(2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.
Kamisah Osman & Neelavany Marimuthu. (2010). Setting new learning targets for the 21st century science education in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3737–3741.
Kamus Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Edisi Ketiga. (2000). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Utusan Malaysia.
Kamus Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Edisi Keempat. (2013), Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.Utusan Malaysia.
Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2001). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (5th ed.). Belmont, CA, US: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1980). Laporan jawatankuasa kabinet mengkaji pelaksanaan dasar pelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012a). Ringkasan eksekutif , plan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan dan Dasar Pendidikan.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012b). Pendidikan kebangsaan melangkah ke hadapan.Diakses pada 14 jun 2012 daripada http://www.google.com.my
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2013). Ringkasan eksekutif , plan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan dan Dasar Pendidikan.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Sains Tahun 1. Kuala Lumpur: BPK, KPM.
Kerlinger, F.N. & Lee, H.B.(2000). Foundations of behavioural research. Fourth edition. Australia: Wadsworth Thompson.
Khairul Anwar Abu Bakar .(2014). Tahap Kesediaan Guru Pelatih Institut Pendidikan Guru Dalam Latihan Mengajar.Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.
Kirschner, P. A., Schweller, J. & Clark, R.A. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based,experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 75–86.
Kock, Z. J., Taconis, R., Bolhuis, S., & Gravemeijer, K. (2013). Some Key Issues in Creating Inquiry-Based Instructional Practices that Aim at the Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits. Research in Science Education, 43, 579–597.
Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. Laporan jawatankuasa kabinet. (1979). Kuala Lumpur:Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Lawson, H. (2003). Citizenship education for pupils with learning difficulties: Towards participation? Support for Learning, 18(3), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.00293
Lee Jensen, J., & Lawson, A. (2011). Effects of collaborative group composition and Inquiry instruction on reasoning gains and Achievement in undergraduate biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-07-0089
Levy, P., & Petrulis, R. (2012). How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry- based learning? Studies in Higher Education, 37, 85-101.
Ling, J.A.Y. (1999). Primary science curriculum implemenation in Malaysia; Inquiry as hope and practice. Thesis Doktor Falsafah. University Massey, Palmerston, North New Zealand.
Lilia Halim (2006.) Analisis Keperluan Guru-guru Sains Sekolah Rendah Dalam Aspek Pengajaran Sains di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah. Jurnal Teknologi. 44. 13-30, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,
Lilia Halim & T.Subahan Mohd Merah. (2016). Science Education Research and Practice in Malaysia. Science Education Research and Practice in Asia, 71– 93. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4
Ling, A.Y., & St. George, A. (1998). Implementing an inquiry-based primary science curriculum in Malaysia: A case study of an experienced teacher. Paper presented at the Australasian Science Education Research Association 29th Annual Conference, 9-12 July, 1998, Darwin, Australia.
Low Kee Sun. (2013). Perbandingan pola pembelajaran kontekstual dan tahap pemahaman konsep Sains pelajar sekolah menengah rendah di Malaysia dan Singapura. Journal Teknologi Social Sciences. 63(2), 91-96.
Lynn, M.R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382– 385.
Mahaliza Mansor, Norlia Mat Norwani & Jamal @ Nordin Yunus (2010). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan alat ukur pentadbir sebagai pemimpin pembangunan professional berasaskan sekolah (PPPS). Seminar Sehari Penyelidikan 2010. Tanjong Malim: Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Mahamod, Z., & Lim, N. R. (2011). Kepelbagaian kaedah penyoalan lisan dalam pengajaran guru bahasa melayu: kaedah pemerhatian. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 1(Mei), 51–65.
Maor, D. & Fraser, B.J. (2007). The Development and Use of a Classroom Instrument in the Evaluation of Inquiry-based Computer- Assisted Learnng. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 401-421.
Marc, J.(2007).TIMSS 2007 Sample Design.TIMSS Technical Report. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Centre, Boston College.
Marlina Ali & Shaharom Noordin (2006). Tahap penguasaan kemahiran berfikir kritis di kalangan pelajar pendidikan fizik merentas jantina. Buletin Persatuan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Johor, 15 (1), 99-110.
Marsh, C.J. & Willis, G. 2003. Curriculum: Alternative Approaches, Ongoing Issues.Edisi Ke-5. Ohio: Pearson Education.
Marshall, J.C. (2013). Succeeding with inquiry in science and math classrooms. Alexandria, VA:ASCD and Arlington, VA:NSTA.
Marshall, J. C., J. B. Smart, and D. M. Alston. 2016. “Inquiry-Based Instruction: A Possible Solution to Improving Student Learning of Both Science Concepts and Scientific Practices.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 1–20.
Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., Foy, P. & Stanco, G.M.(2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science.Boston College: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education.
Mayer, R. E. (1977). Thinking and problem solving: An introduction to human cognition and learning. Scott, Foresman and Company
McFarlane, D. (2013). Understanding the Challenges of Science Education in the 21st Century: New Opportunities for Scientific Literacy. International Leters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 4, 35–44.
McKinsey & Company (2010). How the world's most improved school systems keep getting better.
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J. dan Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds In Instructional Materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191.
Melissa, M. S. (2007). Scientific Reasoning Skills Development in The Introductory Biology Courses for Undergraduates. United States: The Ohio State University.
Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science.Paper presented at the the Meeting of High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, Washington, DC.
Millar, R. (2008). Taking scientific literacy seriously as a curriculum aim. Asia- Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 1–18.
Minner, D.D., Levy, A.J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry‐based science instruction— what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496.
Mohamad Ali Jemali, Ahmad Esa dan Razali Hasan. (2011). Kesediaan keterampilan sosial dalam kalangan guru-guru pelatih di Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia dengan budaya kerja sekolah. Persidangan kebangsaan penyelidikan dan inovasi dalam pendidikan dan latihan teknik dan vokasional, 16-17 November 2011, Universiti Tun Hussin Onn Malaysia.
Mohd Asnawi Satdimin, Md Shufian Awang, Avelyn Siang & Nur Atiqah Basri. (2010). Apakah yang dimaksudkan dengan kurikulum. Bincangkan pendapat dan pandangan pakar pakar tentang kurikulum. Dimuat turun daripada https://www.slideshare.net/atieyann2/pendapat-dan-pandangan-pakar-pakar- tentang-kurikulum.htm
Mohd Najib, G. & Abdul Rauf, I.(2011). Penilaian hubungan tahap penguasaan konsepsi sains dengan tahap kemahiran proses sains guru peringkat menengah rendah. Journal of Science and Mathematics Educational, 3: 1-19.
Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar, (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbit UTM.
Mohd. Majid Konting. (1990). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Mohd. Majid Konting.(2000). Asas penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mohd.Najib Ghafar. (1998). Penyelidikan Pendidikan . Skudai : Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Mohd Yusri Ibrahim (2010). Bimbingan cepat analisis data penyelidikan untuk Pendidikan dan Sains Sosial. Pahang: Bandar Ilmu.
Muhammad Mohd Zain. (2013). Amalan Pendekatan Inkuiri Guru dalam Pengajaran Sains Sekolah Menengah. (Disertasi yang tidak diterbitkan). Dicapai daripada http://www.fp.utm.my/epusatsumber/pdffail/ptkghdfwP2/Muhammad%20Bin %20Mohd%2 0Zain.TP.pdf
Murphy, E. (1997). Constructivism: From philosophy to practise. Retrieved from http://www.cdli.ca/~elmurphy.emurphhy/cle.html
National Research Council, NRC. (1996). The Role of Scientists in the Professional Development of Science Teachers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council, NRC. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council, NRC. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation. (2007). Pathways to Inquiry : A Science Inquiry Skills Framework. Dimuat turun dari http://www.science4inquiry.com/documents/PTI%20Inquiry%20Skill%20Fra mework2008.2015.pdf
Nooraini Othman. (2014). Thinking Skill Education and Transformational Progress in Malaysia.International Education Studies. Vol. 7, 27 – 32.
Noraini Idris. (2010). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill Education.
Noraini Idris. (2012). Malaysian Teacher Quality, Perception by Various Stakeholders. Ministry of Higheer Education. Pearson Malaysia Sdn.Bhd.
Nor’ain Mohd. Tajudin, Nurulhuda Abd Rahman, Noor Shah Saad, Asmayati Yahaya, Hasimah Alimon, Mohd. Uzi Dollah & Mohd. Mustamam Abd Karim (2013). Kemahiran Penaakulan Saintifik dan Stail Pengajaran Pensyarah: Indikasi Awal Ke Arah Peningkatan Kualiti Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Pelajar Institusi Pengajian Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia. 3(1), 48-59.
Nurshamshida Md Shamsudin, Nabilah Abdullah, & Nurlatifah Yaamat. (2013). Strategies of teaching science using an Inquiry based Science Education (IBSE) by novice chemistry teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 583–592.
Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813020 17X
OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
Oliva, P.F. (2009). Developing The Curriculum. 7th edition. United States: PearsonEducation.
O’Neill, Geraldine. (2010). Programme design: overview of curriculum models.http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/ucdtlp00631.
Ong, Saw Lan. (2005). Assessing Preservice Science Teachers Competency in Integrated Science Process Skills.National Conference on Skills and Competencies in Education. November. Penang, Malaysia: 185-194.
Ornstein, A.C. & Hunkins, F.P. (2009). Curriculum Foundations, Principles, and Issues.Edisi Ke-5. United States: Pearson Education.
Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty-first century. Eurasia Journal of mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2007, 3(3), 173-184.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London:King’s College.
Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Guide. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis uing SPSS. McGraw-Hill Education.
Pandey. A, Nanda. G. K. and Ranjan. V(2011) “Effectiveness of Inquiry Training Model over Conventional Teaching Method on Academic Achievement of Science Students in India,” Journal of Innovative Research in Education, vol.1(1), pp. 7-20, 2011.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.
Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia PPPM. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. Education, 27(1), 1–268.
Pilgrim, M.E. (2014). Engaging future teachers in problem-based learning with the park city mathematics institute problems. PRIMUS, 24(3), 215-231.
Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pittman
Print, M. (1993). Curriculum Development and Design, Edisi Ke-2. Australia: Allen &Unwin Pty. Ltd.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (1993). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Sains Sekolah Rendah. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2002). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Fizik Tingkatan Lima. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2003). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Sains Tahun 6 Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Rendah. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases.Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2006.tb00884.x
Quigley, C., Marshall, J.C., Deaton, C.C.M., Cook, M.P., & Padilla, M. (2011). Challenges to inquiry teaching and suggestions for how to meet them. Science Educator, 20(1), 55-61.
Rissing, S. W., & Cogan, J. G. (2009). Can an inquiry approach improve college student learning in a teaching laboratory? CBE Life Sci Educator, 8(1), 55-61.
Rosidi Fahlid. (2011). Tahap kesediaan guru terhadap pelaksanaan kurikulum baru Mata Pelajaran Aliran Vokasional (MPAV) di Sekolah Menengah Teknik di Negeri Perak. Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Roth, W.M. (1995). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 709-736.
Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M. K., & Bowen, G. M. (1998). How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9, 25-48.
Rozita Radhiah Said & Abdul Rasid Jamian. (2012). Amalan pengajaran karangan guru cemerlang di dalam bilik darjah: Kajian satu kes pelbagai lokasi. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 27, 51–68, Pulau Pinang: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Saavedra, A.R & V.D. Opver. (2012). Learning 21st -century skill a requires 21st – century teaching. Kappan, October 2012. New Style of Instruction, RAND Corp (Santa Monica Ca).
Sadiah Baharom. (2008). Kesan paduan kitar pembelajaran dan pemetaan konsep terhadap konsepsi pelajar tentang pembahagian sel. Tesis Ph.D (Tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Saedah Siraj & Mohammed Sani Ibrahim. (2012). Standard Kompetensi Guru Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.fp.utm.my.ePusatSumber/listseminar/medc2012/pdf/159.pdf
Salbiah Mohd Som. (2012). Aplikasi dalam strategi pembelajaran inkuiri penemuan dalam Azian T.S.Abdullah, A'Azmi Shahri, Baharin Yahya, NorAzian Mohd Kamel, Suriya Ahmad, Lau Shin Chai, Rosli Omar, & Jamilah Omar (Ed.), Kreativiti dan inovasi elemen merentas kurikulum dalam KSSR kreativiti dan inovasi: Elemen merentas kurikulum. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Salleh Abd Rashid. (2003). Pemikiran Profesional Keguruan Terhadap Kurikulum dan Pengajaran. Dibentangkan di Seminar Pendidikan MPBL.
Sampson, V. dan Clark, D. B. (2009). The Impact of Collaboration on the Outcomes of Scientific Argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448–484.
Sandifer, C., & Lottero-Perdue, P. (2010). Delving deeper into science teaching: An early childhood magnetism lesson as a context for understanding principles of inquiry. Connect Magazine, 24(2), 11-14.
School aan Zet. (2014). The art of asking questions. Promoting excellence by means of inquiry- and design-based learning]. Retrieved from http://www.schoolaanzet.nl/fileadmin/contentelementen/school_aan_zet/Opbr engsten_CfP_2013-
Schmidt, P. (2003) Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 175-188.
Science Inquiry Tools Deliver Significant Improvement in Middle-school Students' Skills .(2010). Dimuat turun daripada http://www.nsf.gov/news/
Sekaran, U.(2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (Edisi keempat). New York: John Wiley & Son, Inc.
Seth Sulaiman dan Jamil Tarmizi. (2010). Tahap Kognitif Pelajar Fizik Di Sekolah Berasrama Di Daerah Kuala Terengganu Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Fizik Berdasarkan Kepada Taksonomi Bloom, 1-8. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor. (Tidak diterbitkan)
Shaharom Noordin & Siti Sarah Muhammad. (2011). Tahap Kefahaman Kemahiran Mengukur Serta Menggunakan Nombor Dan Membina Hipotesis Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Pendidikan Fizik. Fakulti Pendidikan.Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Sharifah Maimunah Syed Zin & Lewin, K. M. (1993). Insights into science education: Planning and policies in Malaysia. Paris: UNESCO.
Sheehan, J. (1986). Curriculum models: product versus process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 11:671-678.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Shulman, L.S. (1992). Ways of seeing, ways of knowing, ways of teaching, ways of learning about teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 393-396.
Sickel, A. J., & Friedrichsen, P. (2015). Beliefs, practical knowledge, and context: A longitudinal study of a beginning biology teacher’s 5E unit. School Science and Mathematics, 115(2),75-87
Siegel, M.A. (2012). Filling in the distance between us: Group metacognition during probem solving in a secondary education course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 325-341.
Sjøberg, S. (2016). OECD, PISA, and Globalization. The Influence of the International Assessment Regime. In Tienken, C. H. & Mullen, C. A. (Eds). (2016). Education Policy Perils. Tackling the Tough Issues.(pp. 102–133). New York: Routledge.
Sprinthall, R. C., Schmutte, G. T., and Sirois, L. (1991). Understanding educational research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J., W., Roberts, C., & Keifer, A. (2008). Where might sand dunes be on mars? Engaging students through inquiry-based learning in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 32, 71-86.
Spronken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research?. Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723-740.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
Stotter, J., & Gillon, K. (2010, September). Diversity Challenge Resilience: School Libraries in Action: Proceedings of the 12th Biennial School Library Association of Queensland, the 39th International Association of School Librarianship Annual Conference incorporating the 14th International Forum on Research in School Librarianship (pp. 1-7), Brisbane QLD Australia.
Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P.D., & Hindman, J.L. (2008). What Is The Relationship Between Teacher Quality And Student Achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 165- 184.
Stronge, J.S., Ward, T.J. & Grant, L.W. (2011). What Makes Good Teachers Good? A Cross-Case Analysis of the Connection between Teacher Effectiveness andStudent Achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4) 339–355.DOI: 10.1177/0022487111404241.
Sukiman. et al. (2012). Pengajaran Kemahiran Berfikir: Persepsi dan Amalan Guru Matematik Semasa Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di Bilik Darjah. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik. Vol. 2 No.1 ISSSN 2232-0393
Syed Anwar Aly & Merza Abbas.(2000). Penyerapan kemahiran saintifik dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran kimia di tahap menengah. Simposium Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik UiTM, Shah Alam pada 3 November 2000.
Syed Ismail Syed Mustafa & Ahmad Subki Miskon, (2011). Pengantar Pendidikan Edisi Sentakan Terkini. Selangor Darul Ehsan: CIPTA Printing & Publishing (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Syer, C. A. (2007). Student Teachers’ Understanding of Inquiry Instruction.
Tajularipin Sulaiman & Nor Azlina Abdul Rahim. (2010). Pelbagai pendekatan bagi pengajaran Sains yang berkesan. Dalam Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub & Nurzatulshima Kamarudin, Isu pengurusan, pengajaran & pembelajaran dalam pendidikan Sains (m.s. 24-34). Universiti Putra Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Tamir, P. (1985). Content analysis focusing on inquiry. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(1), 87-94.
Tan Shin Yen & Siti Hajar Halili. (2015). Effective Teaching of Higher-Order Thinking (HOT) in Education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 3(2), 41–47.
Tan Yin Peen & Mohammad Yusof Arshad. (2014). Teacher and student questions: A case study in Malaysian secondary school problem-based learning. Asian Social Science, 10(4), 174–182.
Tatar, N. (2012). Inquiry-based Science Laboratories : An analysis of preservice teachers' beliefs about learning science through inquiry and their performances. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 11( 3), 2012
Toulmin, S.(1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Trnova, E., & Trna, J. (2012). Development of Science and Technology Gifted Students through Inquiry-Based Science Education. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Education (pp. 838-844). Samos, Greece: Research and Training Institute of East Aegean, Greece.
Turner, D.W., (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754-760. Retrieved from Tyler R.W.1950. Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. http://www.nova.edu.ssss/QR/QR15-3/qid.pdf
Tyler, R. (1950). Basic Principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
UNESCO. (2010). Teaching and learning for a sustainable future, Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/mods/theme_d/mod22.hml
Von Secker, C. (2010). Effects on inquiry-based teacher practices on science excellence and equity. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 151-160.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scriber, & E. Souberman, (Eds. and trans. ), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wee, B., Shepardon, D., Fast, J., & Harbor, J., (2007). Teaching and Learning about Inquiry: Insights and Challenge in Professional Development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 63-89.
Wellington, J.(1994). Secondary Science. Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Routledge.
Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 276-301. doi: 10.1002/tea.20329
Winnie, S.S.L dan Mohammad Yusof Arshad. 2014. Corak Amalan Pengajaran Inkuiri Berdasarkan Interaksi Verbal Guru Kimia. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik 2: 1-10.
Wiseman, D.C. (1999). Research strategies for education. Belmount, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Worth, K., Duque M. & Saltiel E. (2009), Designing and implementing Inquiry based Science Units.Edited and Published by La main à la pâte, URL: http:// www.fondation- lamap.org/sites/default/files/upload/media/minisites/seminaire_ international/Guide_IBSE_light.pdf .
Yalcinoglu,P.(2007). Evolution as Represented through Argumentation: A Qualitative Study on Reasoning and Argumentation in High School Biology Teaching Practices. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. The Ohio State University.
Yeam, Koon Peng (2007) Tahap Pencapaian Dan Pelaksanaan Kemahiran Proses Sains Dalam Kalangan Guru Pelatih. Masters thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Yoon, H.G., Joung, Y.J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: Difficulties on and under the scene.Research in Science Education, 42, 589-608. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9212-y
Mohd Yusri Ibrahim (2010). Bimbingan cepat analisis data penyelidikan untuk Pendidikan dan Sains Sosial. Pahang: Bandar Ilmu.
Zainal Abidin, N. (2007). Kesan Penggunaan Peta Konsep Ke Atas Pencapaian Mata Pelajaran Rekabentuk Sistem Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Program Ijazah Sarjana Muda Teknologi Maklumat dan Multimedia.Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn.
Zaini Abdullah, Mohmad Noor Mohmad Taib, Ikhsan Othman, Norila Md Salleh, Abu Bakar Yusuf & Abdul Talib Mohamed Hashim. (2012). Perkembangan Pendidikan di Malaysia: Falsafah dan Dasar : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Zainudin Awang. (2012). Research Methodology and Data Analysis. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Mara Press.
Zamri Mahamod & Nor Razah Lim. (2011, Mei). Kepelbagaian kaedah penyoalan Lisan dalam pengajaran guru Bahasa Melayu: Kaedah pemerhatian. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 1 (1), 51-65. ISSN: 2180-4842. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.
Zanaton Hj Iksan. (2011). Amalan penyoalan lisan guru kimia dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran elektrokimia. Universiti Malaya.
Zikmund, Babin, Carr & Griffin. (2010). Business research metods (8th ed.). Australia: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Zion, M., Cohen, S., & Amir, R. (2007). The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 37, 423–447.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |