Performance assessment standard approach based on form 1 Physical Education secondary school curriculum standard

Norkhalid Salimin

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	GV Recreation Leisure
Main Author :	Norkhalid Salimin
Additional Authors :	Julismah Jani Sanmuga Nathan Jeganathan Mohd Izwan Shahril
Title :	Performance assessment standard approach based on form 1 Physical Education secondary school curriculum standard

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The purpose of this study was to develop a standard school-based assessment module in Physical Education to evaluate the performance assessment standard of Form 1 students. In general, the research was conducted to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of the Performance Assessment Standard Approach (PASA) Module in Form 1 Secondary School Standard Curriculum. Preexperimental study design was used in this study in three schools in Muslim district, Perak consisted of 235 Form 1 students using Form 1 Physical Education Student Performance Standard instrument form (validity; r = .79 & reliability; r = .71). In overall, the achievement level of learning performance standards for learning aspects based on PASA for Unit 2 – Rhythmic Movement, Unit 4 - Volleyball, Unit 5 - Basic Athletics, Unit 6 - Recreation and Leisure were Good for all items, namely Thinking Strategies, Reasoning Skills, Critical Thinking Skills and Creative Thinking Skills. The findings also showed that there is a significant relationship between student achievement levels by learning unit. The study concluded that PASA could identify the achievement level holistically and comprehensively. The implication of the study suggested PASA instrument to be used as an alternative instrument to determine the student learning achievement level based on higher order thinking skills.

References

1. Julismah, J., Norkhalid, S., Izwan, M. S., & Kamaruzaman, S. A. (2014). Model-model Pentaksiran dalam Pendidikan Jasmani (1st Ed.). Tanjong Malim, Perak: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

2. Ministry of Education Malaysia (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Putrajaya.

3. Ministry of Education Malaysia (2013). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 2 Tahun 2013: Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (KSSR) Tahap II Secara Berperingkat-peringkat Mulai Tahun 2014. Putrajaya.

4. López-pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-, E., Macphail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education : a review of international literature. Sport Education and Society, 18(1), 57–76.

5. Matanin, M. & Tannehill, D. (1994). Assessment and Grading in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 395–405.

6. Melograno, V. J. (2007). Grading and Report Cards for Standards-Based Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 78(6), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2007.10598041

7. Miller, K. D. (2006). Measurement by Physical Educator. Why and How. Singapore: Mc Graw Hill.

8. Izwan, M. S., Norkhalid, S., & Gunathevan, E. (2015). The Validity and Reliability of ISO Test towards the Performance Assessment of Future Physical Education Teachers in Teaching and Learning Process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(December), 814–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.184

9. Konting, M. M. (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

9. Morrow, J. R., Jackson, A. W., Disch, J. G., & Mood, D. P. (2005). Measurement and evaluation in human performance (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

10. Munira, M. (2010). Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Pendidikan Jasmani oleh Guru Tingkatan Satu (Tesis Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaya, Malaysia.

11. Norkhalid, S., Izwan, M. S., Julismah, J., Azali, R., Gunathevan, E., Liza, S., & Akmaniah, N. (2017). Development Assessment Instrument for Basic Skills of Invasion in Physical Education. Adv. Sci. Lett. 23(1), 386–389.

12. Othman, L., Esah, S. M., Fuaad, A. D., Azali, R., & Hisham, O. B. (2013). Pembinaan Standard Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah bagi sekolah rendah di Malaysia. Tanjong Malim, Malaysia.

13. Ravikumar, V., Ghani, A. K. A., & Aziah, I. (2015). The effect of teacher autonomy on assessment practices among Malaysian cluster schoolteachers. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 5 (1), 31-36.

14. Rossett, A. (1987). Training Needs Assessment. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.

15. Noah, S. M. & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaan Modul Bagaimana Membina Modul Latihan Dan Modul Akademik. Penerbit UPM: Serdang, Selangor.

16. Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post‐secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. 1. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701591867

17. Wee, E. H. (2003). Attitude of secondary school teachers toward physical education. Journal of Malaysian Association for Physical Education, Sport Science and Fitness, 3, 71–98.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page