The effectiveness of learning assessment instrument (LAI) based on teaching games for understanding (TGFU) for badminton games

Mohd Izwan Shahril

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	GV Recreation Leisure
Main Author :	Mohd Izwan Shahril
Additional Authors :	Julismah Jani Norkhalid Salimin Wawan Suherman Guntur
Title :	The effectiveness of learning assessment instrument (LAI) based on teaching games for understanding (TGFU) for badminton games

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	The author has requested the full text of this item to be restricted.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of Learning Assessment Instrument (LAI) for badminton games based on Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) in Physical Education (PE) subject. Present findings showed high validity and reliability of LAI when comparing students’ learning achievement. The students’ learning achievements of cognitive, psychomotor and affective aspects were performed very well at Band 5. This study also revealed there were no significant differences between boarding schools, religious schools and daily schools, but there was a strong relationship with students’ achievement. In conclusion, LAI was found to be very effective and can be used as a standard measurement in student’s reasoning activity and guide teachers in teaching and learning assessment.

References

1. Anderson, Lorin W., Krathwohl, & David R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy. New York. Longman Publishing.

2. Araújo, D., Davids, K., Bennett, S., Button, C., & Chapman, G. (2004). Emergence of Sport 10 Skills Under Constraint. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill Acquisition In 11 Sport: Research, Theory and Practice (pp. 409-433). London:Routledge, Taylor & 12 Francis.

3. Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A Model For The Teaching Of Games In Secondary Schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18(1), 5-8.

4. Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Condition of Learning and Theory of Instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.

5. Griffin, L., Mitchell, S., & Oslin, J. (1997). Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

6. Izwan, Norkhalid & Gunathevan a/l Elumalai (2015). The Validity and Realibility of ISO Test Toward The Performance Assessment of Future Physical Education Teachers in Teaching and Learning Process. Science Direct Procedia-Social and Behaviorial Sciences 00 (2015) 000-

7. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.

8. Salimin, N., Jani, J., Ishak, N.A., & Hassan, S., Elumalai, G., Boon, O. K., & Shahril, M. I. (2014). Validity and Reliability of Comprehensive Assessment Instruments for Professional Skills in Field and Court Sport Among Major Students Coaching Based on Model K. International Journal of Humanities, Arts, Medicine and Sciences (BEST: IJHAMS) ISSN(E): 2348-0521 Vol. 2, Issue 4, Apr 2014, 37-44.

9. Rink, J. E. (2002). Teaching physical education for learning 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

10. Robert Mills Gagné (1975). Essentials of Learning for Instruction: Principles of Educational PsychologySeries. Dryden Press.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page