|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan antara personaliti dan prestasi
kerja dalam kalangan guru prasekolah berdasarkan lima item yang terdapat dalam model personaliti
Big Five berpandukan teori personaliti Eysenck dan satu item prestasi kerja dalam kalangan guru
prasekolah yang mengajar disekolah kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia daerah Manjung, Perak. Pendekatan
kuantitatif melalui kajian kes instrumental digunakan. Sampel kajian yang dipilih secara rawak
terdiri daripada 56 orang guru prasekolah yang mengajar kanak-kanak enam tahun. Data yang
diperolehi melalui soal selidik dianalisis dengan statistik deskriptif dan analisis korelasi
Pearson. Dapatan menunjukkan tahap personaliti Big Five openness (M=3.70, SP=0.43) adalah tahap
paling tinggi dan diikuti dengan conscientouness (M=3.60, SP=0.30), extroversion (M=3.50, SP=
0.40), agreeableness (M= 3.34, SP=0.50) dan neuroticism (M=3.31, SP=0.60) serta tahap bagi prestasi
kerja adalah (M=3.80, SP=0.44). Kajian ini menunjukkan kesemua ciri personaliti Big Five tidak
mempunyai hubungan yang signifikan dengan prestasi kerja, dimana extroversion dan prestasi kerja
(r=-0.079, p=0.533) diikuti agreeableness (r=-0.049, p=0.515), conscientiousness (r=-0.173,
p=0.190), neuroticism (r=-0.005, p=0.969) dan openness (r=-0.056, p=0.672). Sebagai kesimpulan,
kajian menujukkan semua lima ciri personaliti Big five tidak berhubungan secara positif dan tidak
signifikan, ciri personaliti ini dapat ditingkatkan dan guru prasekolah haruslah mempunyai
personaliti yang menarik dan melalui ciri personaliti ini, guru prasekolah dijadikan sebagai sumber
rujukan kepada ibu bapa dan pihak-pihak tertentu. Implikasi kajian menunjukkan tiga aspek utama
mengikut tahap ciri personaliti Big Five iaitu openness, conscientiousness dan extroversion tidak
berhubung dengan prestasi kerja sebaliknya prestasi kerja sampelkajian dipengaruhi oleh factor
demografi, Justeru, saranan dalam meningkatkan ciri personality dan tahap prestasi kerja dalam
kalangan gutu prasekolah; pemilihan calon guru prasekolah serta kandungan latihan di
institusi-institusi perguruan perlulah mengikut tahap ciri
personality Big Five dalam melahirkan guru yang lebih cemerlang.
|
| References |
Abdul Halim Masnan. (2014). Amalan pedagogi guru prasekolah permulaan. Tesis Dokor Falsafah (tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Sains Malaysia. Pulau Pinang.
Abdul Razak Idris. (2017, Februari 14). Guru edar dadah ditangkap di Miri. Astro Awani. Dicapai daripada http://www.astroawani.com.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
APADictionary of Psycology, (2007). Washington: American Psycological Association.
Azhani Adnan. (2008). Kertas Kerja. Personaliti guru: Pengaruh ke atas pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Tanjung Malim. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Azilah Abdul Rahman (2010). Hubungan Antara Personaliti Dan Gaya Pengajaran Guru Dengan Pencapaian Matematik Pmr Satu Kajian Di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kota Tinggi (Tesis sajana tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Utara Malaysia. 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2008). Social representations theory: A progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00374.
Brodin, J. & Renblad, K. (2015). Early Childhood Educators’ Perspectives of the Swedish National Curriculum for Preschool and Quality Work. Early Childhood Educ Journal (2015) 43: 347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0657-2.
Burgess, J., Robertson, G. & Patterson, C. (2010). Curriculum implementation: Decisions of early childhood teachers. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 35 (3), 51-59.
Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to persoality inventory construction. A comparison of merits. American Psychologist, 39, 214-227.
Cervone, D. & Pervin, L. A. (2008). Personality: Theory and research. 10th edition. Hobken: John Wiley & Sons.
Chua Yan Piaw. (2006). Kaedah Penyelidikan: McGraw-Hill Sdn Bhd.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coeffcient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
Colman, A. (2003). A dictionary of psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Costa, P.T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO PI/ NEO-FFI Manual Supplement. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Decker. L & Rimm-Kaufman. Sara. (2008). Personality characteristics and teacher beliefs among pre-service teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly. 35 (2) : 45- 64.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality Structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology 41: 417-440.
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of Personality. London: Methuen.
Faizah Abd. Ghani & Nagarajan Kupusamy. (2012). Hubungan trait personaliti dan kecekapan guru bimbingan dan kaunseling di sekolah menengah daerah Pasir Gudang Johor. Jurnal of Educational Psyachology & Counseling. (6) June 2012.92-115.
Fatimah Wati Halim, Muhammad Zahir Mazlan, & Fatimah Omar. (2015). Personaliti dan nilai peribadi asas Pegawai Tadbir Diplomatik dalam era transformasi sektor awam. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 29(1), 63–73.
Fauzi Hussin, Jamal Ali, & Mohd Saifoul Zamzuri Noor. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan & analisis data SPSS. Sintok: Penerbitan UUM.
Fuad Mohamed Berawi. (2016). Ekonometrik asas. Panduan Penggunaan SAS. Sintok: Penerbit UUM.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative, description of personality: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59; 1216-1229.
Habibah Elias & Noran Yaakub. (2006). Psikologi Personaliti: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Hazalizah Hamzah, Arifin Zainal, & Asmawati Desa (2011). Peranan personaliti dan kepengikutan dalam prestasi kerja guru. Bitara Edisi Khas( Psikologi Kaunseling).
Jangan malu jadi guru tadika. (2017, Mei 24). Utusan Online. Dicapai daripada http://www.utusan.com.my.
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five Inventory-version 4a and 5a. Berkeley, CA: University of Califonia, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
Kenneth S Bordens & Abbott, B. B. (2008). Research design and method: A process approach. 7th ed. New York: McGraw Hill. http//opus.ipfw.edu/psych_facpub/43
Kirk, J. & Miller, M.L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills, Ca: Sage Publications.
Kreijcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determing sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychologycal Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Larsen, R. J., & Buss, D.M. (2008). Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature (3rd edition). New York: McGraw Hill. Ma’arof dan Haslinda. (2004). Psikologi. Edisi Kedua. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill. Maltby, J,. Day, L. & Macaskill, A.(2007). Personality, Individual Differences, and Intelligence. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Milas, G. (2004). Personality and Social attiudes. In Croation. Jastrebarsko: Naklada Slap.
Mishel, W. (1968). Personality and Assessment. New York: Wiley.
Mohd Majid Konting. (2004). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mohd Najid Abd Ghaffar. (2009). Prinsip asas penilaian program pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Fakulti Pendidikan.
Muhaya Muhamad. (2015, Mei 17). Guru dikenang kerana kebaikannya. Utusan Online. Dicapai daripada http://www.utusan.com.my
Noraini Idris (2010). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Mc Graw-Hill (M) Sdn. Bhd, Kuala Lumpur.
Nurul Hudani Md. Nawi, Ma’rof Redzuan, & Noor Hisyam Md Nawi. (2016). Hubungan antara tret personaliti kehematan, keterbukaan pada pengalaman, ekstraversi dan kesetujuan dengan prestasi kerja dalam kalangan pemimpin pendidik bagi Sekolah Prestasi Tinggi (SBT) di Malaysia. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia 30 (1) (2016): 102-112 ISSN-2289-8174, 30(1), 102–112.
Olson, M. and Hergenhahn, B. (2007). An introduction to theories of personality. 7th ed. Boston, Mass.: Pearson Prentice Hall, pp.1, 6, 7, 10, 403-432, 438-464, 469- 497, 529-531
Pervin, L. & John, O. P. (2001). Personality: Theory and research (8th edition). New York: Wiley.
Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A.(2007). Organizational Behavior. Edisi ke- 12. New Jersy: Peason / Prentice Hall.
Roberts, B. W. & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age. A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychology. Bull. 126, 3-25. 10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3.
Ryckman, R. M., Libby, C. R., Van Den Borne, B., Gold, J. A., & Lindner, M. A. (1997). Values of hypercompetetive and personal devvelopment competitive individuals. Journal of personality assessment, 62, 84-94. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6201_8.
Ryckman, R. M. (2004). Theories of personality (8th edition). Belmont, CA : Thomas Wadsworth.
Sanja,T .V & Irena, P. (2013). Importance of Students’ personality traits for their future work with preschool children. Metodicki Obezori 8(18), 34–46.
Saucier, G. & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). Evidence for the big five in analyses of familiar english personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10. 61-77.
Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Development of casual models of processes determining job performance. Current Directions in Psychologycal Science, 1. 89-92.
Schmidt, F. L., Shaffer, J. & OH, I. S. (2008). Increased accuracy of range restriction corrections: Implications for the role of personality and general mental ability in job and training performance. Personnel Psychology, 61,827-868, doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00132.
Shultz, D. P. & Schultz, S. E. (2009). Theories of Personality. Edisi ke-9. Belmont: Cengage Learning.
Skolinspektionen [The Swedish School Inspectorate] (2013). The quality work in school enchaces changes. Experience And Results From Attendences Inspection Of Quality. Report Dnr 40-2013:2853. www.skolinpektionen.se
Slunjski, E. (2008). Kindergarten- the learning community: a place of dialogue, cooperation and mutual learning.
Smidt, W. (2015). Big Five personality traits as predictors of the academic success of university and college students in early childhood education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(4), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1080419.
Standard Guru Malaysia. (2012). Bahagian Pendidikan Guru Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia: Putrajaya.
Tatalović Vorkapić, S. (2012). The Significance of Preschool Teacher’s Personality in Early Childhood Education: Analysis of Eysenck’s and Big Five Dimensions of Personality. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2),28–37. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijpbs.20120202.05.
Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting educational research (5th ed). Fort Worth TX. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Viswesvaran, C. & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspective on models performance. International Journal of selection and Assessment, 8 (4). 216-226.
Zahari Hashim. (2010). Hubungan antara ciri-ciri pasukan kerja dan keberkesanan pasukan kerja dalam kalangan guru-guru sekolah menengah kebangsaan di negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan. Tesis Doktor Falsafah (tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Tanjung Malim. Perak.
Zulelawati Bujang & Yusni Zaini Yusof. (2015). Trait personaliti dan hubungan dengan prestasi akademik bakal guru di sebuah institusi latihan perguruan. Jurnal Bitara Edisi Khas (psikologi kaunseling). (8) 2015.
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |