1. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

2. Bahrum, S., & Ibrahim, M. N. (2018). Kebolehgunaan Modul “ steAm ” dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual Sekolah Rendah Usability of " steAm " Module in Teaching and Learning of Visual Arts Education in Primary School. KUPAS SENI Jurnal Pendidikan Seni, 6(May), 65–79.

3. Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy—practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798- 016-9385-9

4. Barrett, B. S., Moran, A. L., & Woods, J. E. (2014). Meteorology meets engineering: an interdisciplinary STEM module for middle and early secondary school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-6

5. Bartholomew, S. R., & Strimel, G. J. (2018). Factors influencing student success on open-ended design problems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9415-2

6. Berland, L., Steingut, R., & Ko, P. (2014). High School Student Perceptions of the Utility of the Engineering Design Process: Creating Opportunities to Engage in Engineering Practices and Apply Math and Science Content. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 705– 720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9498-4

7. Capobianco, B. M., Yu, J. H., & French, B. F. (2015). Effects of Engineering Design-Based Science on Elementary School Science Students’ Engineering Identity Development across Gender and Grade. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014- 9422-1

8. Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram, Á. B. (2017). The effects of an afterschool STEM program on students’ motivation and engagement. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0065-4

9. Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6

10. Curriculum Development Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016). Panduan Pelaksanaan Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Retrieved from https://cms.mrsm.edu.my/cms/documentstorage/com.tms.cms.document.Document_d7d05d 4f-ac12c870-38675e41-18331a55/003

11. Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., Stewart, C. O., Chappell, S., & Hathcock, S. (2014). The Examination of a Pullout STEM Program for Urban Upper Elementary Students. Research in Science Education, 44(3), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9387-5

12. Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes, (May), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15584327

13. Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban High School Students’ IT/STEM Learning: Findings from a Collaborative Inquiry- and Design-Based Afterschool Program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9457-5

14. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. The Research Journal for Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.

15. English, L. D. (2018). Learning while designing in a fourth-grade integrated STEM problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9482-z

16. English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7

17. Estapa, A. T., & Tank, K. M. (2017). Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom: a professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge.

18. International Journal of STEM Education (2017), 4(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594- 017-0058-3

19. Evans, M. A., Lopez, M., Maddox, D., Drape, T., & Duke, R. (2014). Interest-driven learning among middle school youth in an out-of-school STEM studio. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9490-z

20. Fan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x

21. Fan, S. C., Yu, K. C., & Lou, S. J. (2017). Why do students present different design objectives in engineering design projects? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9420-5

22. Ghani, M. A. ., & Ayop, S. K. (2018). Validity and Reliability of Conceptual Survey in Electricity and Magnetism ( CSEM ) Instrument in Malay. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i7/4402

23. Goktepe Yildiz, S., & Ozdemir, A. S. (2018). The effects of engineering design processes on spatial abilities of middle school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9491-y

24. Gomoll, A., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Šabanović, S., & Francisco, M. (2016). Dragons, Ladybugs, and Softballs: Girls’ STEM Engagement with Human-Centered Robotics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9647-z

25. Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. (2016). Building Up STEM: An Analysis of Teacher

26. Mentzer, N., Huffman, T., & Thayer, H. (2014). High school student modeling in the engineering design process. International Journal Te, 24(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013- 9260-x

27. Miller, B. G., & Roehrig, G. (2018). Indigenous cultural contexts for STEM experiences: snow snakes’ impact on students and the community. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9738-4

28. Moreno, N. P., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G., Newell, A. D., & Burnett, C. A. (2016). Preparing Students for Middle School Through After-School STEM Activities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9643-3

29. National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council [NAE & NRC]. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612

30. National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. (L. Katehi, G. Pearson, & M. Feder, Eds.), The National Academies Press. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12635

31. National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. (C. on H. S. S. P. for K.-12 S. Education, Ed.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from www.nap.edu

32. Piaw, C. Y. (2016). Mastering Research Methods (2nd ed.). Malaysia: McGraw Hill Education.

33. Purzer, Ş., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R. S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0019-7

34. Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., … Cremeans, C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4

35. Schnittka, C. G., Evans, M. A., Won, S. G. L., & Drape, T. A. (2016). After-School Spaces: Looking for Learning in All the Right Places. Research in Science Education, 46(3), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9463-0

36. Simpson, A., Burris, A., & Maltese, A. (2017). Youth’s Engagement as Scientists and Engineers in an Afterschool Making and Tinkering Program. Research in Science Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9678-3

37. Strimel, G. J., Bartholomew, S. R., Kim, E., & Zhang, L. (2018). An Investigation of Engineering Design Cognition and Achievement in Primary School. Journal for STEM Education Research, 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0008-0

38. Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2018). Investigating the use of robotics to increase girls’ interest in engineering during early elementary school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9483-y

39. Tek, O. E., Safiee, N., Jusoh, Z. M., Salleh, S. M., & Nor, A. manas H. M. (2017). Penerangan Dasar Pendidikan 2018. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 7(2), 43–51. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/images/KPM/UKK/2018/04 Apr/Slide Penerangan Dasar KPM Tahun 2018 - PDF.pdf

40. Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., … Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Jourrnal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525

41. Todd, B., & Zvoch, K. (2017). Exploring Girls’ Science Affinities Through an Informal Science Education Program. Research in Science Education, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017- 9670-y

42. Zhou, N., Pereira, N. L., George, T. T., Alperovich, J., Booth, J., Chandrasegaran, S., … Ramani, K. (2017). The Influence of Toy Design Activities on Middle School Students’ Understanding of the Engineering Design Processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(5), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9693-1