Common coaching leadership style and leadership practice differences between Team Athletes in Kuala Lumpur School Sports Council (MSSWPKL)

Zulakbal Abd Karim

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	GV Recreation Leisure
Main Author :	Zulakbal Abd Karim
Additional Authors :	Fakrul Hazely Ismail
Title :	Common coaching leadership style and leadership practice differences between Team Athletes in Kuala Lumpur School Sports Council (MSSWPKL)

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The purpose of this research conducted was to identify the common popular leadership style and leadership practices differences between teams athlete in Kuala Lumpur School Sports Council (MSSWPKL). 50 respondants from various teams athletes of MSSWPKL which comprise of 30 male and 20 female athletes were selected. The research methodology utilized series of questionnaire which was based on Leadership Scale for Sports (LSS) developed by Chelladurai and Saleh (1978; 1980). The questionnaire consists of 5 dimension styles of coaching which are a) Practice and Instructional Dimension, b) Democratic Dimension, c) Autocratic Dimension, d) Social Support Dimension, 5) Positive Feedback Dimension. Independent T-Test statistical inferencing analysis is use to analyses the data. Findings indicate that there are no significant differences between genders preferences for the entire coaching dimension in MSSWPKL. The findings also identified practice and instructional dimension is preferred by the athletes in MSSWPKL.

References

1. Aziz, A. S., (2004). Perkaitan di antara orientasi matlamat dan stail kepimpinan dengan pencapaian atlet SUKMA negeri Perak di Kejohanan SUKMA 2004. http://www.ppp.upsi.edu.my/eWacana/Sukma.html

2. Blom, L. C., Visek, A. J., & Harris, B. S. (2013). Triangulation in youth sport: healthy partnershipsamong parents, coaches, and practitioners. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 4(2),86-96.

3. Cassidy, T. G., Jones, R. L., & Potrac, P. A. (2015). Understanding sports coaching: the pedagogical, social and cultural foundations of coaching practice: Routledge.

4. Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. D. (1980). Dimension of leadership behavior in sports Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sports Psychology. 2, 34-35.

5. Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. D. (1980). Preferred Leadership in Sports. Canadian Journal ofApplied Sports Science. 3, 85 – 92.

6. Cushion, C. J., & Jones, R. L. (2014). A Bourdieusian analysis of cultural reproduction: Socialisation and the ‘hidden curriculum’ in professional football. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 276–298.

7. Karim, Z. A. (2016). Malaysian football coaches: The key challenges. International Journal of Health, Physical Education and Computer Science in Sports, 24(1), 18-24.

8. Karim, Z. A., Ghafar, N. A. A., & Nadzalan, A. M. (2018). The leadership style among football coaches leadership style among teachers in Hulu Langat district: The implications on National Football Development Program (NFDP) in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(3), 551-558.

9. Karim, Z. A., Muszali, R., Hizan, H., Yakub, Y., Ahmad, Y., Hassan, S., & Suhaimi, M. A. A., (2019). The Reality of UPSI Football Team Mentoring Program: Qualitative Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(2), 312–321.

10. Karim, Z. A., & Nadzalan, A. M. (2017). The development of coaching knowledge among Malaysian accredited football coaches. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(4), 113-127.

11. Karim, Z. A., & Nadzalan, A. M. (2017). Malaysia football coaches: Development characteristics International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 2017, Vol. 7, No. 9 ISSN: 2222-6990, 305-312.

12. Lamat, S. A., Muhamad, T. A., Surat, S., & Ahmad, M. A., (2016). Coaching styles and mental toughness among UiTM’S football players. Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education, Malaysia, ISSN 2232-1926, 22-34.

13. Mansor, R. & Hamzah, M. M. I., (2015). Kepimpinan berkualiti: Perspektif mengenai kompetensi yang diperlukan untuk memimpin dengan berkesan. Jurnal Pengurusan 45 (2015), 143 – 154.

14. McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 284): Harvard Business Press.

15. Patterson, M. M., Carron, A. V., & Loughead, T. M. (2005). The influence of team norms on the cohesion-self-reported performance relationship: A multi-level analysis. Psychology of sport and exercise. 6, 479-493

16. Pilus, M. A., & Saadan, R., (2009). Coaching leadership styles and athlete satisfaction among hockey team. Journal of Human Capital Development, ISSN: 1985-7012 Vol. 2 No. 1, 77 -87

17. Rasyid, M. N., & Aziz, A. S., (2012). Gaya kepimpinan jurulatih yang digemari oleh atlet Sekolah Sukan Malaysia. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani ISSN 2232-1926, 45-53.

18. Riemer, H. A., & Chelladurai, P. (1995). Leadership and satisfaction in athletics. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1 7, 276-293.

19. Trocado, R. & Gomes, A.R. (2013). Winning or not winning the influence on Coach-Athlete Relationships and Goal Achievement. J. Hum. Sport Exerc., 8(4), 986-995.

20. Yulk, G. A., (2006). Leadership in organizations. Sixth Edition. Pearson/Prentice Hall

21. Wee, A., S., S., L., Shabesan Rengasamy. (2014). Gaya kepimpinan jurulatih yang diminati atlet atlet sekolah menengah di Malaysia berasaskan jantina. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, Bil. 1, Isu 1, 65-74.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page