UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :L Education
Main Author :Ramlee bin Ismail
Additional Authors :Jarrod Sio Jyh Lih
Title :Binary logistic regression analysis of instructional leadership factors affecting English language literacy in Primary Schools
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
Year of Publication :2019
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
This paper discusses the factors contributing to student achievement in English language literacy in primary schools within Sibu division, Sarawak, Malaysia. The study involved 694 teachers who taught in 105 lower primary schools. Binary logistic regression was applied to predict the instructional leadership’s influence on student achievement in literacy. The findings revealed that one dimension of instructional leadership - supervising and evaluating instruction - emerged as strong predictors of literacy. The result indicated that schools were more than 17 times more likely to achieve 100% literacy rate when the instruction processes were supervised and evaluated by the headmasters. Supervision and evaluation of instruction had a positive influence on students’ achievement for English language literacy, hence making this a possible course of action for school heads. More comprehensive studies are needed to ascertain its consistency as well as investigating other predictors for literacy.   

References

1. Alam, A. & Ahmad, M. (2017). The impact of instructional leadership, professional communities and extra responsibilities for teachers on student achievement. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 31(3), 383-395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2015-0126

2. April, D. & Bouchamma, Y. (2015). Teacher supervision practices and principals’ characteristics. Alberta Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 61, 329-346.

3. Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and challenges of English language education reform in Malaysian primary schools. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 22(3), 65-78. doi:http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2203-05

4. Baloglu, N. (2012). Relations between value-based leadership and distributed leadership: a casual research on school principles’ behaviors. Educational sciences: theory and practice. Vol. 12(2), 1375-1378.

5. Behrman, J.R., Parker, S.W., Todd, P.E. & Wolpin, K.I. (2015). Aligning learning incentives of students and teachers: Results from a social experiment in Mexican high schools. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 123(2), 325-364. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/675910.

6. Bendikson, L., Robinson, V. & Hattie, J. (2012), Principal instructional leadership and secondary school performance. Set: Research Information for Teachers. Vol 1, 2-8.

7. Blackmore, J. (2017). ‘In the shadow of men’: The historical construction of educational administration as a ‘masculinist’ enterprise. Gender matters in educational administration and policy. 27-48.

8. Bokhari, R., Md Rashid, S. & Chan, S.H. (2016). Teachers’ Perception on the Implementation of the Literacy, Numeracy and Screening (LINUS LBI2.0). Malaysian Journal of ELT Research. Vol. 11(1), 108-121.

9. Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B. & Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 18(3), 34–64.

10. Bosker, R., de Vos, H. & Witziers, B. (2000). Theories and models of educational effectiveness. Paper presented at AERA conference 2000, New Orleans, United States.

11. Brandon, J., Hollweck, T., Donlevy, J.K. & Whalen, C. (2018). Teacher supervision and evaluation challenges: Canadian perspectives on overall instructional leadership. Teachers and Teaching. Vol. 24(3), 263-280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1425678

12. Brophy, J. (2013). Motivating Students to Learn. New York: Routledge.

13. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. London: Open University Press.

14. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S. & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

15. Chen, J. & Guo, W. (2018). Emotional intelligence can make a difference: The impact of principals’ emotional intelligence on teaching strategy mediated by instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 1-24. doi: 10.1177/1741143218781066

16. City, E. (2009). Instructional Rounds in Education: a Network Approach to Improving Teaching and Learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

17. Cohen, D., Raudenbush, S. & Ball, D. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Vol. 25(2), 1-24.

18. Danielson, D. (2011). Evaluations that help teachers learn. Educational leadership. Vol. 69(2), 36-41.

19. Derrington, M.L. & Angelle, P.S. (2013). Teacher leadership and collective efficacy: connections and links. International Journal of Teacher Leadership. Vol. 4(1).

20. De Vos, M. (2011). Quantitative and qualitative aspects of education in South Africa: An analysis using the National Income Dynamic Study. Stellenbosch Economic Working Papers (No. 06/2011).

21. DiPaola, M. F. & Hoy, W. K. (2014). Improving Instruction Through Supervision, Evaluation, and Professional Development. Information Age Publishing.

22. Duyar, I.T., Mina, D.K. & Owoh, S.J. (2019). Promoting student creative problem-solving skills: Do principal instructional leadership and teacher creative practices matter? Vocational Identity and Career Construction in Education. 78-99.

23. Dweck, C. (2017). Summary of Carol S. Dweck’s Mindset: Key Takeaways & Analysis. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

24. Dweck, C.S., Walton, G.M. & Cohen, G.L. (2011). Academic Tenacity: Mindsets and Skills that Promote Long Term Learning. Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

25. Elmore, R. (2004). School Reform from the Inside Out: Policy, Practice, and Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

26. Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London, Great Britain: Sage Publications Limited.

27. Fryer, R.G. (2011). Financial incentives and student achievement: Evidence from randomized trials. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1-44. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr045

28. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: Systems thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

29. Gay, L., Mills. G. & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (9th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

30. Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Eun, S.K. & Miller, R. (2015). A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Roles of  Instructional Leadership, Teacher Collaboration, and Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Support of Student Learning, American Journal of Education. Vol.121(4), 501-530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/681925

31. Goddard, Y. L., Neumerski, C., Goddard, R. D., Salloum, S. & Berebitsky, D. (2010). A multilevel exploratory study of the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of principals’ instructional support and group norms for instruction in elementary schools. Elementary School Journal. Vol. 111(2), 336-357.

32. Grissom, J.A., Loeb, S. & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher. Vol. 20(10), 1-12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X13510020

33. Gurley, K.D., Anast-May, L., O’Neal, M., Lee, H. & Shores, M. (2015). Instructional leadership behaviors in principals who attended an assistant principals’ academy: Self-reports and teacher perceptions. Planning and Changing. Vol. 46(1), 127-157.

34. Gurley, K.D., Anast-May, L., O’Neal, M. & Dozier, R. (2016). Principal instructional leadership behaviors: Teacher vs. self- perceptions. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation. Vol. 11(1).

35. Hadzir, N., Alias, A.M., Kamaruzaman, A.L. & Mohd Yusof, H.M. (2016). Teachers’ perception on literacy, numeracy and screening (LINUS2.0) assessment features based on year 1 students’ performance. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL). Vol. 4(1), 2321-3108.

36. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.): Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

37. Hall, P. (2019). The instructional leader’s most difficult job. Educational Leadership. Vol. 76(6), 12-17.

38. Hallinger, P. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 47(2), 271–306.

39. Hallinger, P., Bickman, L. & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal. Vol.96(5), 527–549.

40. Hallinger, P., Adams, D., Harris, A. & Suzette Jones, M. (2018). Review of conceptual models and methodologies in research on principal instructional leadership in Malaysia. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol.56(1), 104–126. doi:10.1108/jea-03-2017-0025

41. Hallinger, P. & Hosseingholizadeh, R. (2019). Exploring instructional leadership in Iran: A mixed methods study of high- and low-performing principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–22. doi: 10.1177/1741143219836684

42. Hallinger, P., Hosseingholizadeh, R., Hashemi, M. & Kouhsari. M. (2017). Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. Vol. 46(5), 800-819. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143217700283

43. Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Vol. 9(2), 157-191.

44. Hallinger, P. & Lee, M. (2014). Mapping instructional leadership in Thailand: Has education reform impacted principal practice? Education Management Administration & Leadership. Vol. 42(6). Doi:10.1177/1741143213502196.

45. Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. F. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal. 217-247.

46. Hallinger, P., Walker, A., Nguyen, D.T.H., Truong, T. & Nguyen, T.T. (2017). Perspectives on principal instructional leadership in Vietnam: a preliminary model. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 55(2), 222-239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2015-0106

47. Harris, A., Jones, M., Adams, D. & Cheah, K. (2018): Instructional leadership in Malaysia: a review of the contemporary literature, School Leadership & Management. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2018.1453794

48. Harris, A., Jones, M., Soon, K.L.C., Devadason, E. & Adams, D. (2017) Exploring principals’ instructional  leadership practices in Malaysia: insights and implications, Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 55 (2), 207-221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2016-0051

49. Heck, R. H., Larson, T. & Marcoulides, G. (1990). Instructional leadership and student achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 26(2), 94–125.

50. Hendriks, M. & Steen, R. (2012). Results from school leadership effectiveness studies (2005–2010). In J. Scheerens (Ed.), School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta-analysis of empirical studies (pp. 65-129). New York: Springer.

51. Hopkins, D. (2013). Instructional leadership and school improvement. Effective leadership for school improvement. 65-81.

52. Huber, S. G. & Muijs, D. (2010). School leadership effectiveness: The growing insight in the importance of school leadership for the quality and development of schools and their pupils. In S. G. Huber (Ed.), School leadership—International perspectives (pp. 57-77). New York: Springer.

53. Ismail, S.N., Don, Y., Husin, F. & Khalid, R. (2018). Instructional leadership and teachers’ functional competency across the 21st century learning. International Journal of Instruction. Vol. 11(3), 135-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11310a

54. Jamelaa Bibi Abdullah & Jainabee Md Kassim. (2011). Instructional Leadership and Attitude Towards Organizational Change Among Secondary Schools Principal in Pahang, Malaysia. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol.15, 3304-3309.

55. Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities, Educational and Psychological Measurement. Vol. 30, 607-610.

56. Labone, E. (2004). Teacher efficacy: maturing the construct through research in alternative paradigms. Teaching and Teacher Education. Vol. 20, 341–359. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.013.

57. Lee, M., Hallinger, P. & Walker, A. (2012). A distributed perspective on instructional leadership in international Baccalaureate (IB) schools. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 48(4), 664-698.

58. Lee, M., Walker, A. & Chui Y.K. (2012). Contrasting effects of instructional leadership practices on student learning in a high accountability context. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 50 (5), 586 - 611. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578231211249835

59. Leithwood, K., Harris, A. & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful leadership. School Leadership and Management. Vol. 28(1), 27-42.

60. Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 20(10), 1-33.

61. Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Minnesota: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota.

62. Liang, X.Y., Kidwai, H. & Zhang, M.X. (2016). How Shanghai does It: insights and lessons from the highestranking education system in the world. Washington DC: World Bank.

63. Marks, H.M. & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: Integrating transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 39(3), 370-397.

64. Marzano, R.J., Frontier, T. & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

65. Maslowski, R. (2001) School Culture and School Performance: An Explorative Study into the Organizational Culture of Secondary Schools and their Effects. Endschede, The Netherlands: Twente University Press.

66. McGhee, M. W. & Lew, C. (2007). Leadership and writing: How principals’ knowledge, beliefs, and interventions affect writing instruction in elementary and secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 43(3), 358-38.

67. McNeil, K.L., Lowenhaupt, R.J. & Katsch-Singer, R. (2018). Instructional leadership in the era of the NGSS: Principals’ understandings of science practices. Science Education. Vol.102(3), 452-473. doi: https://doi.org1-.1002/sce.21336

68. Ministry of Education (2013). Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.

69. Mokhtari, K., Thoma, J. & Edwards, P. (2009) How One Elementary School Uses Data to Help Raise Students’ Reading Achievement. The Reading Teacher. Vol. 63(4), 334-337.

70. Musliman, R., Ariffin, S.R. & Din, R. (2013). Assessing students’ spatial intelligence for literacy and numeracy skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 90, 695-701.

71. Nazariyah Sani & Abdul Rahman Idris. (2012). Implementation of LINUS Programme Based on the Model of Van Meter and Van Horn. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science. Vol.1(2).

72. Neumerski, C.M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teachers, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational administration quarterly. Vol.49(2), 310-347.

73. Neumerski, C.M., Grissom, J.A., Goldring, E., Drake, T.A., Rubin, M., Cannata, M. & Schuermann, P. (2018). Restructuring Instructional Leadership: How Multiple-Measure Teacher Evaluation Systems Are Redefining the Role of the School Principal, The Elementary School Journal. Vol.119(2), 270-297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/700597

74. Ng, D., Nguyen, T. D. & Wong, K. S. B., & Choy, K. W. W. (2015). Instructional leadership practices in Singapore. School Leadership and Management. Vol. 35(4), 388–407.

75. Noman, M., Awang Hashim, R. & Shaik Abdullah, S. (2018). Contextual leadership practices: The case of the successful school principal in Malaysia. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. Vol. 46(3), 474-490.

76. Ong, C. H. & Dimmock, C. (2013). Principals’ Engagement of Low Ability Students in Singapore Secondary Schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Vol. 41 (2), 214–232. doi:10.1177/1741143212468345.

77. Owens, R. (2010). New schools of thought: Developing thinking and learning communities. International Journal of Learning. Vol. 17(6), 43–54.

78. Pan, H. L. W., Nyeu, F. Y. & Cheng, S.H. (2017). Leading school for learning: Principal practices in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 55(2), 168–185.

79. Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual; A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed). Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

80. Pashiardis, P. & Johansson, O. (eds) (2016). Successful School Leadership: International Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

81. Powell, A., Farrar, E. & Cohen, D. (1986). The shopping mall high school: winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

82. Printy, S., Marks, H. M. & Bowers, A. J. (2009). Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share instructional influence. Journal of School Leadership. Vol. 19(5), 504-532.

83. Qian, H., Walker, A. & Li, X. (2017). The west wind vs the east wind: instructional leadership model in China. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol.55(2), 186–206. doi:10.1108/jea-08-2016-0083

84. Rahmah Murshidi , Mohd Majid Konting, Habibah Elias & Foo Say Fooi (2006). Sense of Efficacy Among Beginning Teachers in Sarawak. Teaching Education. Vol. 17(3), 265-275. doi: 10.1080/10476210600849730

85. Range, B.G., Hewitt, P. & Young, S. (2014). Principals’ perceived supervisory behaviors regarding marginal teachers in two states. Administrative Issues Journal. Vol. 4(1). doi: https://dc.swosu.edu/aij/vol4/iss1/9

86. Range, B.G., Scherz, S., Holt, C.R. & Young, S. (2011). Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. Vol. 23(3), 243-265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9123-5

87. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A. & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol.44, 635–674.

88. Saarivirta. T. & Kumpulainen, K. (2016). School autonomy, leadership and student achievement: reflections from Finland. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 30(7), 1268-1278. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2015-0146

89. Salo, P., Nylund, J. & Stjernstrøm, E. (2015). On the practice architectures of instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. Vol. 43(4), 490–506

90. Sammons, P., Hillman, J., Mortimore, P. (1995). Key Characteristics of Effective Schools: A Review of School Effectiveness Research. London: OFSTED.

91. Samuddin, K. M. & Krish, P. (2018). English Orthographic Depth among Malay Learners at a Primary School. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 24(1), 56–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.17576/3L2018-2401-05

92. Schatzer, R.H., Caldarella, P., Hallam, P.R. & Brown, L.B. (2013). Comparing the effects of instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement: Implications for practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Vol. 42(4).

93. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

94. Schneider, M., Huss-Lederman, S. & Sherlock, W. (2012). Charting new waters: Collaborating for school improvement in U.S. high schools. TESOL Journal. Vol. 3, 373–401. doi:10.1002/tesj.26

95. Shaked, H. & Benoliel, P.S. (2019). Instructional boundary management: The complementarity of instructional leadership and boundary management, Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143219846905

96. Smith, M. S. & O’Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-268). Philadelphia, PA:Falmer.

97. Steinbacher-Reed, C. & Rotella, S.A. (2017). Windows into instructional practice. Educational Leadership. Vol. 74(8), 68-72.

98. Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P. & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and Learning. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 46(1), 31-56.

99. Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S. & Reynolds, D. (2000). In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.). Context issues within school effectiveness research. International handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 160–183). London: Routledge.

100. Trani, R.K. & Irvine, R.K. (2010). Fallacies in education: Why schools are mired in mediocrity. Rowman & Littlefield Education, Maryland.

101. Tubah, H. & Hamid, Z. (2011). The Influence of Demography on Reading and Comprehension Skills of LINUS Pupils. Malay Journal. Vol.6, 29-47.

102. Tulowitzki, T. (2019). Supporting instructional leadership and school improvement? Reflections on school supervision from a German perspective. Journal of Educational Administration. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2019-0040

103. Tuytens, M. & Devos, G. (2017). Teacher evaluation policy as perceived by school principals: the case of Flanders (Belgium). Teachers and Teaching. Vol. 24(3), 209–222. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1397508

104. Tyack, D. & Hansot, E. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980. New York, NY: Basic Books.

105. Urtel, M. & Vogel, N. (2011). K-12 Physical education: the principal perspective. National Teacher Education Journal. Vol. 4(1).

106. Walker, J. & Slear, S. (2011). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on the efficacy of new and experienced middle school teachers. NASSP Bulletin. Vol. 95(1), 46-64.

107. Wery, J. & Thomson, M.M. (2013). Motivational strategies to enhance effective learning in teaching struggling students. Support for Learning. Vol. 28(3), 103-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12027

108. Wheelan, S. & Kesselring, J. (2005). Link between faculty group development and elementary student performance on standardized tests. The Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 98(6), 323–330.

109. Witziers, B., Bosker, R. & Kruger, M. (2003) Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 39(3), 398–423.

110. Wilson, D. L. (2011). Successful educational leadership at high performing schools. US-China Education Review. Vol. 8(3), 393-398.

111. Wynne, J. (2005). Teachers as leaders in education reform: Testimonies of transformation. In J. K. Dowdy (Ed.), Readers of the Quilt: Essays on Being Black, Female, and Literate (pp. 3-33). New Jersey: Hampton Press.

112. Youngs, P. (2007). How elementary principals’ beliefs and actions influence new teachers’ experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 43(1), 101-137.

113. Zepeda, S. J. (2016). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts. Routledge: New York.

114. Zhu, Y. & Leung, F.K.S. (2011). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Vol. 9(5), 1189-1212.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.