Students

Shahrul Kadri Ayop

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	Q Science (General)
Main Author :	Shahrul Kadri Ayop
Additional Authors :	Ahmad Tarmimi Ismail
Title :	Students

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

This paper scrutinizes reported education studies in kinematics, which is a basic topic in the field of physics. Articles were searched on major databases about the related studies using keyword search. These were classified into the assessment tools, conceptual difficulties and teaching strategies in kinematics.

References

1. Ismail, A. T. & Ayop, S. K. (2016). Tahap Kefahaman Dan Salah Konsep Terhadap Konsep Daya Dan Gerakan Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat. Jurnal Fizik Malaysia, 37(1), 01090–01101.

2. American Association of Physics Teacher. (2018). PhysPort. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://www.physport.org

3. Araujo, I. S., Veit, E. A., & Moreira, M. A. (2008). Physics students’ performance using computational modelling activities to improve kinematics graphs interpretation. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.004

4. Ayop, S. K. (2017). Analyzing Impulse Using iPhone and Tracker. The Physics Teacher, 55(8), 480–481. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5008342

5. Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17449

6. Bollen, L., De Cock, M., Zuza, K., Guisasola, J., & Kampen, V. P. (2016). Generalizing a categorization of students’ interpretations of linear kinematics graphs. Physical Review Physics Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010108

7. Christian, W., & Belloni, M. (2000). Physlets: Teaching Physics with Interactive Curricular Material. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

8. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249

9. Hestenes, D., & Wells, M. (1992). A mechanics baseline test. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343498

10. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497

11. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, B. P. K. (2010a). KBSM Sains Tingkatan 4.

12. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, B. P. K. (2010b). KBSM Sains Tingkatan 5.

13. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, B. P. K. (2012). KBSM Fizik Tingkatan 4.

14. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, B. P. K. (2014). KSSR Sains Tahun Enam.

15. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, B. P. K. (2016). KSSM Sains Tingkatan 2.

16. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, Graphs, and Graphing: Tasks, Learning, and Teaching. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060001001

17. Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2012). PEPERIKSAAN SIJIL TINGGI PERSEKOLAH MALAYSIA PHYSICS Syllabus and Specimen Papers. Retrieved from http://portal.mpm.edu.my/documents/10156/932262da-0df0-4485-8dfc-c45d8bf0f6a0

18. Manurung, S. R., & Satria, M. (2016). Improving the Conceptual Understanding in Kinematics Subject Matter with Hypertext Media Learning and Formal Thinking Ability. Journal of Education and Practice .

19. Mashood, K. K., & Singh, V. A. (2015). Rotational kinematics of a rigid body about a fixed axis: Development and analysis of an inventory. European Journal of Physics, 36(4), 045020. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/4/045020

20. Novak, G. M. (2011). Just-in-time teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.469

21. Planinic, M., Milin-Sipus, Z., Katic, H., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2012). Comparison of student understanding of line graph slope in physics and mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9344-1

22. Ramlo, S. (2008). Validity and reliability of the force and motion conceptual evaluation. American Journal of Physics, 76(9), 882–886. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2952440

23. Rodrigues, M., & Carvalho, S. P. (2013). Teaching physics with angry birds: Exploring the kinematics and dynamics of the game. Physics Education. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/4/431

24. Rosenblatt, R., & Heckler, A. F. (2011). Systematic study of student understanding of the relationships between the directions of force, velocity, and acceleration in one dimension. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020112

25. Russell, D. W., Lucas, K. B., & McRobbie, C. J. (2003). The role of the microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in kinematics. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025073410522

26. Sokoloff, D. R. (2016). Active Learning Strategies for Introductory Light and Optics. The Physics Teacher, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4937966

27. Suarez, A., Kahan, S., Zavala, G., & Marti, A. C. (2017). Students’ conceptual difficulties in hydrodynamics. Physical Review Physics Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020132

28. Testa, I., Monroy, G., & Sassi, E. (2002). Students’ reading images in kinematics: The case of real-time graphs. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110078897

29. Zavala, G., Tejeda, S., Barniol, P., & Beichner, R. J. (2017). Modifying the test of understanding graphs in kinematics. Physical Review Physics Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020111

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page