Integrating The Arcs Motivational Elements Into An On-Line Game-Based Learning Application: Does The Application Enhance Students Motivation In Learning Programming?

Nor Hasbiah Ubaidullah

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
Main Author :	Nor Hasbiah Ubaidullah
Additional Authors :	Jamilah Hamid Zulkifley Mohamed
Title :	Integrating The Arcs Motivational Elements Into An On-Line Game-Based Learning Application: Does The Application Enhance Students Motivation In Learning Programming?

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Conventional classroom teaching and learning of programming tends to be didactic, which is usually tends to be monotonous and less interesting. In learning programming – a subject that is deemed extremely challenging to master – such a situation can have a serious repercussion in that students can easily become unmotivated and demoralized to learn. As such, students need to use relevant learning tools that can stimulate and motivate them to learn such a course. Of late, many researchers have started using online game-based learning (GBL) tools to improve students’ motivation and performance. Invariably, most of the studies mainly focused on GBL tools to move avatars. As such, this study focuses on programming as the activities in such a game. In this study, the researchers used the prototyping model to develop an online GBL application called Prog-GBL by integrating the elements of mastery learning approach and ARCS model to help motivate students in learning programming. The evaluation of the Prog-GBL was carried out through a survey involving 30 students from one public university in Perak, Malaysia. The research findings showed that the use of such an online learning tool helped improve students’ motivation in learning programming. More revealingly, the four elements of ARCS, namely attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction were highly rated by the students, suggesting that the use of Prog-GBL can motivate students to learn the subject matter.

References

1. ACM/IEEE, (2013), Computer Society, Computer Science Curricula 2013. Curriculum Guideline for Under-graduate Degree Programs in Computer Science, New York: ACM Press, Available:.https://www.acm.org/education/CS2013-final-report.pdf.

2. C.,Sébastien, B., Gytautas & D., Valentina, “Learning Programming through Games and Contests: Overview, Characterisation and Discussion”. Olympiads in Informatics, vol 10, pp. 39–60. doi: 10.15388/ioi.2016.03, 2016.

3. S., Papert, The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer, New York: Basic Books Inc., 1993.

4. M. Resnick, “All I really need to know (about creative thinking) I learned (by studying how children learn) in kindergarten”, In the Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition, 2007.

5. B.-S. Jong, C.-H. Lai, Y.-T. Hsia, & C.-Y. Lu, “Using Game-Based Cooperative Learning to Improve Learning Motivation: A Study of Online Game Use in an Operating Systems Course”, IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 56, no. 2, 2013.

6. A., Mathrani, S., Christian, & A., Ponder-Sutton, “PlayIT: Game Based Learning Approach for Teaching Programming Concepts”, Educational Technology & Society, vol 19, no 2, pp. 5–17, 2016.

7. A., Baytak, & S., M., Land, “A case study of educational game design by kids and for kids”, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 2, no 2, pp. 5242–5246. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.853, 2010.

8. M., D., Dickey, “Engaging by design: how engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design”, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol 53, no. 2, pp. 67–83. doi: 10.1145/142040.142052, 2005.

9. I., Ahmad, & N., Abdullasim, Game design: Issues, trend and challenges, Durian Tunggal: Penerbit Universiti Teknikal Melaka, 2019.

10. M., Prensky, “Digital game-based learning”, Computers in Entertainment (CIE), vol 1, no. 1, pp. 21, 2003.

11. D., A., Arena, D., .L., Schwartz, “Experience and explanation: using videogames to prepare students for formal instruction in statistics”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, pp. 1–11, 2013.

12. V., J., Shute, “Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning”, In: S. Tobias and D. Fletcher (Eds.).Computer Games and Instruction. Information Age: Charlotte N. C., pp. 503–524, 2011.

13. J., P., Gee, “Good video games and good learning”, Phi Kappa Phi, 2005.

14. D., J., Ketelhut & C., C., Schifter, “Teachers and game-based learning: Improving understanding of how to increase efficacy of adoption”, Comput. Educ., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 539–5462011.

15. A., Baytak & S., M., Land, “An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom”, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 765–782, doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9184, 2011.

16. K., Cagin, K., Mary, B., Liz & M., Lachlan, “A serious game for developing computational thinking ad learning introductory computer programming”, Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences vol. 47, pp. 1991-1999, 2012.

17. G.-J., Hwang, C.-M., Hung, & N.-S. Chen, “Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach”, Educational Technology Research and Development, doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9320-7, 2013.

18. L., Tham & R., Tham, “Blended learning: Is game-based learning an effective instructional strategy to engage students in higher education in Singapore? A Pilot study”, Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp: 2-10, 2012.

19. N. Vos, H. Van DerMeijden, & E. Denessen, “Effects of constructingversus playing an educational game on student motivation and deep learning strategy use,” Comput. Educ., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 127–137, 2011.

20. J. H. Block, P. W. Airasian, B. S. Bloom, & J. B. Carroll, Mastery Learning: theory and practice, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.

21. I., Michele, “Game-Based Learning and Gamification: Guidance From Experts”, White Paper, 2017.

22. J., Mehdi, “Combining Mastery Learning with Project-Based Learning in a First Programming Course: An Experience Report”, In Proceeding of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 315-318. Florence Italy – May 16-24, 2015.

23. M., Dresel & N., Hall, “Motivation”, In N. C. Hall & T. Goetz (Eds.), Emotion, motivation, and self regulation: A handbook for teachers (1st ed., pp. 57–122). Bingley: Emerald, 2013.

24. T. W., Malone & M. R., Lepper, “Making learning fun-A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning”, In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, Learning, and Construction (3rd ed., vol. 3, pp. 223 – 253, New Jersey,USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987.

25. T., Noraini, M.Y., Siti Fatimah & M.N. Mohd Khalid, “Needs Analysis Research For Programming Education Program”, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 445-453, 2017.

26. A., E., Woolfolk, Educational psychology (7th ed.). Manhantan, USA: Allyn & Baccon, 1998.

27. T., W., Malone, “Toward a theory of instrinsically motivating instruction” Cognitive Science, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 333-369, doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(81)80017-1. 1981.

28. J., M., Keller, “Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design”, Journal of Instructional Development vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2-10, 1987.

29. T. B., Means, D.H., Jonassen, & F. M., Dwyer, “Enhancing relevance. Embedded ARCS strategies vs. purpose”, Educational Technology, Research & Development, vol. 45, pp. 5-17, 1997.

30. B., Shellnut, A., Knowlton, & T., Savage, T. “Applying the ARCS model to the design and development of computer-based modules for manufacturing engineering courses”, Educational Technology, Research and Development, vol. 47, pp. 100-110, 1999.

31. S. H., Song, & J. M., Keller, “Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation”, Educational Technology, Research and Development vol. 49, pp. 5-22, 2001.

32. P., Hyland, (2006), “A case study of online assessment for basic mathematics to motivate learners and enhance learning”, Available: http:// www.pi.ac.ae/metsmac/proceedings/2006/Hyland-P-METSMaC 2006.pdf.

33. J. M., Keller & K., Suzuki, “Use of the ARCS motivation model in courseware design”, In Jonassen, D. H. (ed.). Instructional Designs for Microcomputer Courseware, Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 401- 434, 1988.

34. J. M. Keller & T. W., Kopp, ”An application of the ARCS model of motivational design”, In. Reigeluth C. M. (ed..), Instructional Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models, Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 289-320, 1987.

35. J. T., Fernandez, (199), “Attribution theory and Keller’s ARCS model of Motivation”, Available: http://cdh.gse.gmu.edu/immersion/knowledgebase/strategies/cognitivis m/keller_ARCS.htm.,

36. R. J., Mills, Kids CollegeTM 2004: An Implementation of the ARCS Model of Motivational Design., Utah State University, 2004.

37. J. M., Keller, (1983), “Keller’s ARCS Model of motivation. Florida State University: Program Leader, Instructional Systems”, Available: http://www.iitheory.com/keller1.htm.,

38. M., P., Uysal, “Improving First Computer Programming Experiences: The Case of Adapting a Web-Supported and Well-Structured Problem-Solving Method to a Traditional Course,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, 2014.

39. G., Mason, T., R., Shuman & K., E., Cook, “Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classro om to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 430–435, 2012.

40. S., Combéfis, & J., Wautelet, “Programming trainings and informatics teaching through online contest”, Olympiads in Informatics,vol. 8, pp. 21–34, 2014.

41. T., Damla & E., C., Nergiz,, “Improving programming skills in engineering education through problem-based game projects with Scratch”, Computers & Education, vol. 120, pp. 64-74, 2018.

42. C. R. Kothari, Research methodology (2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International Publishers, 2004.

43. J., M., Keller, Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Boston, MA: Springer, 2010.

44. V., Mitropoulou & G. Triantafyllidis, “Design of educational software: programmer and teacher approach”, In 3rd International Symposium of Interactive Media Design. 5-7 Januari 2005.

45. T., W., Malone, Toward a theory of instrinsically motivating, Cognitive Science, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 333-369, 1981.

46. R., Garris, R., Ahlers & J. E., Driskell, “Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model”, Journal of Theory, Practice and Research, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 43-56, 2002.

47. W., Huang & T., Johnson, “Instructional game design using cognitive load theory”, In R. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1143-1165). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2008.

48. N. G. Popovich & S. Wongwiwatthanannukit, “Applying the ARCS Model of motivational design to pharmaceutical education”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol 64, pp. 188-196, 2000.

49. M., Z., M., Aman Zahiri & S., Norliah, Saman. ”Pembangunan dan penilaian perisian berbantukan komputer bertajuk ”Promosi” menggunakan elemen motivasi ARCS. Fakulti Pendidikan: UTM, 2005.

50. P., Deubel, “Selecting curriculum-based software : Valuable educational software can help students rise to the challenge of standardized testing and assessment”, Learning and Leading with Technology vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 11-16, 2002. .

51. G., W., Abramson, “How to evaluate educational software”, Principal , vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 60-61, 1998.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page