|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| In this paper, the authors discuss on the integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in teaching and facilitating (TaF) Malay Literature where it plays an important role in keeping with current educational developments. Through the Malaysian Education Development Plan 2013-2025 (Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025) it appears that efforts to increase ICT in education in preparation for generating human capital that ICT literacy need to be further enhanced. Furthermore, the country is facing severe challenges in its efforts to provide a quality education system. The main objective of this study was to identify the TaF method practiced by the teachers of Malay Literature and how they integrate ICT in TaF. The study was conducted in three selected schools in Negeri Sembilan which offer elective Malay Literature in the fourth grade. A semi-structured interview method for six teachers was conducted. Questionnaire techniques and observations during the TaF process were also implemented. Studies have found that various applications such as Kahoot, Nearpot, Powtoon, Google, animated creativity, audio materials and interactive games have simplified and furthered the TaF method of Malay Literature teachers and made it more effective and engaging. In addition, the animated app was found to be able to attract students to continue their TaF activities in the classroom. This is because animation is a set of graphics that is quickly displayed in a series of frames or objects. It would not be too much to say that TaF Malay Literature-based TaF could transfer information from a static textbook to a pattern. Based on the transformation in the TaF method that the teacher was trying to apply, the study found it had a positive effect. This is because the confidence and success of teachers in integrating ICT in TaF has increased the interest and enthusiasm of students in the subject of Malay Literature. |
| References |
1. Abd. Latif Haji Gapor. (2006). Domain Penilaian dalam Teknologi Pendidikan. Tanjong Malim:Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 2. Abd. Rahman Daud. (2006). Teknologi Pendidikan. Konsep, Peranan & Perkembangan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 3. Abd. Rahim Abd. Rashid. (2004). Nilai-Nilai Murni dalam Pendidikan Menghadapi Perubahan dan Cabaran Alaf Baru. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. 4. Abdul Said Ambotang. (2008). “ Inovasi Teknologi ICT dan Multimedia dalam Pendidikan”. Dalam Pengetahuan Pedagogi Guru. Sabah: Universiti Malaysia Sabah. 5. Ani Hj Omar (2011). Apresiasi Teori Kesusasteraan Melayu. Tanjong Malim: Emeritus Publications. 6. Azidah Abu Ziden dan Faizal Abdul Rahman (2012). Penggunaan Sistem Kuiz melalui SMS dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia. 7. Antonio Otalvaro (2013). RawShorts. Diperoleh pada 23 Jun 2016. Available: http://www.rawshorts.com/ 8. Baharuddin et.al. (2002). Siri Modul Pembelajaran Teknologi Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 9. Beranda (2015). 6 Aplikasi Presentasi Terbaik Alternatif PowerPoint. Diperoleh pada 23 Jun 2016 daripada https://www.downloadsoftwaregratisan.com/2015/03/aplikasi-presenta si-alternatif-microsoft-power-point.html 10. Buletin Anjakan (2015). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. Diperoleh pada 23 Jun 2016. Available: http://www.padu.edu.my/files/Buletin_Anjakan_Bil_5-2015_(Final).pdf 11. Baharom Muhamad dan ph.D iliyas Hashim (2010). Gaya Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Puyup: PTS PROFESIONAL Sdn. Bhd. 12. Crumlish, G. (1996). Teaching with Computer: A Curriculum for Special Educators. Boston: College Hill Press. 13. Drs. Cece Wijaya, Drs. Djadja Djadjuri, Drs. A. Tabrani Rusyan. 1988. Upaya Pembaharuan dalam Pendidikan dan Pengajaran. Bandung: Remadja Karya Cv. 14. Goh Boon Cheng. (2009). Pengurusan Teknologi Maklumat dalam Pendidikan. Ipoh: Penerbit Multimedia Sdn. Bhd. 15. Giri Prasetyo (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Assisted Individualization Menggunakan Aplikasi Wondershare Quizcreator Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. LEMBANG: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. 16. Jamalul Lail Abdul Wahab ed. (2000). Pendidikan Guru Alaf Baru. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 17. Kamaruddin Husin, Abdullah Yusof dan Mohd Ra’in Shaari. (2011). Pedagogi Bahasa: Amalan Bilik Darjah. Kuala Lumpur: Emeritus Publications. 18. Kibble,J. (2007). Use of Unsupervised Online Quizzes as Formative Assessment in a Medical Physiology Course: Effects of Incentives on Student Participation And Performance. Adv Physiol Educ 31:253-260, American Physiological Society. 19. Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (2012). Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 20. Mohd Yusof Abdullah. (2008). Pengetahuan Pedagogi Guru. Sabah: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Sabah 21. Michael Fullan. (2011). Makna Baharu Perubahan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia. 22. Norzaini Azman. (2015). Mobiliti Akademik Memperkasa Pemindahan dan Perkongsian Ilmu ke Arah Kesarjanaan. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 23. Peat, M and Franklin, S (2002). Supporting Student Learning: The Use of Computer Based Formative Assessment Modules. British Journal of Educational Technology 24. Shukri Zain. (2011). Penyeliaan Pendidikan Teori dan Amalan. Tanjong Malim: Emeritus Publications. 25. Syed Ismail Syed Mustapa dan Ahmad Subki Bin Miskon. (2010). Guru dan Cabaran Semasa. Selangor: Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd. 26. Yusup Hashim. (1997). Media Pengajaran untuk Pendidikan dan Latihan. Selangor: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |