|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| The research aimed to investigate the effects of Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) as a control group compared to Sport Education Model (SEM) and Hybrid TGfU and Sport Education Model (HTGfU–SEM) as treatment groups on the psychomotor domain in badminton doubles game play. The effectiveness of these models were assessed based on execution skills off serve, forehand, lob shot, drop shot and smash in badminton doubles game play. The research employed Quasi Eksperimental preposttest design. The sample involved a total of 96 students aged 13 years old chosen intactly and distributed equally each in three groups with 16 girls and 16 boys. The adopted Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI) was employed to access psychomotor aspect of serve, forehand, lob shot, drop shot and smash. The data were analyzed using Mean, SD, ANOVA, MANOVA, MANCOVA and post-hoc test. MANCOVA analysis results showed that there were significant improvement in serve performance, forehand, lob shot and drop shot via HTGfU-SEM. Therefore HTGfU-SEM is recommended as game play instructional model for future learning skills in badminton
|
| References |
[1] Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016). Pendidikan Jasmani dan Pendidikan Kesihatan (Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran) Tingkatan 1. Malaysia: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [2] Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18. [3] Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction - Robert Mills Gagné - Google Books (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. [4] Gil-Arias, A., Harvey, S., Cárceles, A., Práxedes, A., & Del Villar, F. (2017). Impact of a hybrid TGfU-Sport Education unit on student motivation in physical education. PLOS ONE, 12(6),e0179876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179876 [5] Griffin, L. L., Brooker, R., & Patton, K. (2005). Working towards legitimacy: two decades of teaching games for understanding. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 10(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980500340703 [6] Harvey, S., & Jarrett, K. (2014). A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(3), 278–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.754005 [7] Hastie, P. (1998). Applied Benefits of the Sport Education Model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(4),24–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605530 [8] Hastie, P. A., & Curtner-Smith, M. D. (2006). Influence of a hybrid Sport Education—Teaching Games for Understanding unit on one teacher and his students. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 11(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980500466813 [9] Hastie, P. A., Sinelnikov, O. A., & Guarino, A. J. (2009). The development of skill and tactical competencies during a season of badminton. European Journal of Sport Science, 9(3), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390802542564 [10] Hopper, T. (1998). Teaching games for understanding using progressive principles of play. The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. [11] Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Pendidikan Jasmani dan Pendidikan Kesihatan (Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran) Tingkatan 1. Malaysia: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [12] Kirk, D. (2013). Educational Value and Models-Based Practice in Physical Education Educational Value and Models-Based Practice in Physical Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(9), 873–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.785352 [13] Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching Games for Understanding and Situated Learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe Model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.21.2.177 [14] Mandigo, J. L., & Holt, N. L. (2004). Reading the game: Introducing the notion of gammes literacy. Physical and Health Educational Journal, 70(3), 4–10. [15] Mesquita, I., Farias, C., & Hastie, P. (2012). The impact of a hybrid Sport Education-Invasion Games Competence Model soccer unit on students’ decision making, skill execution and overall game performance. European Physical Education Review, 18(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12440027 [16] Metzler, M. (2011). Instructional Model for Physical Education (3rd ed.). Scottsdale,AZ: Holcomb Hathaway. [17] Mitchell, Stephen A. Oslin, Judith L. Griffin, L. L. (2013). Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills : A Tactical Games Approach for Ages 7 to 18 (3rd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. [18] Nathan, S. (2014). Instruksi Model Taktikal Permainan. malaysia: PTS Akademia. [19] Pereira, J., Araújo, R., Farias, C., Bessa, C., & Mesquita, I. (2016). Sport Education and Direct Instruction Units: Comparison of Student Knowledge Development in Athletics. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 15(4), 569–577. [20] Siedentop, D. (1994). Sport Education: Quality PE Through Positive Sports Experiences. Human Kinetics Publishers. [21] Siedentop, D. (1998). What Is Sport Education and How Does It Work? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69, 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605528 [22] Wallhead, T. L., Garn, A. C., & Vidoni, C. (2014). Effect of a sport education program on motivation for physical education and leisure-time physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2014.961051 [23] Webb, P. I., Pearson, P. J., & Forrest, G. (2006). Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) in primary and secondary physical education, in ICHPER-SD International Conference for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport and Dance, 1st Oceanic Congress, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006. [24] Werner, P., Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1996). Teaching Games for Understanding: Evolution of a Model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1996.10607176 |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |