UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
This paper deals with the instruction models in Physical Education, Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) and Sport Education Model as possible options in the instruction of Physical Education games. Each instruction has certain features and appropriate features can be combined to form Hybrid Teaching Games for Understanding - Sport Education Model. This hybrid model can be used as an option for teaching Physical Education in the invasion games, net and wall games, striking and fielding games and target games |
References |
1. Bilgin, N., & Dalkıran, O. (2017). Examining Attitudes of Students Regarding the Sports Education Model and Direct Teaching Model. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i12.2718 2. Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18. 3. Griffin, L. L., Brooker, R., & Patton, K. (2005). Working towards legitimacy: two decades of teaching games for understanding. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 10(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980500340703 4. Harvey, S., & Jarrett, K. (2014). A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(3), 278–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.754005 5. Herrera, H. (2017). A Review of Literature on the Benefits of Sport Education on Secondary Physical Education. 6. Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 177–192. 7. Kirk, David. (2013). Educational Value and Models-Based Practice in Physical Education Educational Value and Models-Based Practice in Physical Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(9), 873–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.785352 8. Mandigo, J. L., & Holt, N. L. (2004). Reading the game: Introducing the notion of gammes literacy. Physical and Health Educational Journal, 70(3), 4–10. 9. Metzler, M. (2011). Instructional Model for Physical Education (3rd ed.). Scottsdale,AZ: Holcomb Hathaway. 10. Minhat, N., Salimin, N., & Nathan, S. (2019). Selected Model of Instructions for Physical Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 774–781. 11. Mitchell, Stephen A. Oslin, Judith L. Griffin, L. L. (2013). Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills : A Tactical Games Approach for Ages 7 to 18 (3rd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 12. Morales-Belando, M. T., & Arias-Estero, J. L. (2017). Influence of Teaching Games for Understanding on Game Performance, Knowledge, and Variables Related to Adherence in Youth Sailing. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2016-0024 13. Nathan, S. (2014). Instruksi Model Taktikal Permainan. PTS Akademia, Malaysia. 14. Pereira, J., Araújo, R., Farias, C., Bessa, C., & Mesquita, I. (2016). Sport Education and Direct Instruction Units: Comparison of Student Knowledge Development in Athletics. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 15(4), 569–577. 15. Siedentop, D. (1994). Sport Education: Quality PE Through Positive Sports Experiences. Human Kinetics Publishers. 16. Siedentop, D. (1998). What Is Sport Education and How Does It Work? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69, 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605528 17. Siedentop, D., Hastie, P. A., & Hans Van Der Mas. (2011). Complete guide to sport education (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics Publishers. 18. Werner, P., Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1996). Teaching Games for Understanding: Evolution of a Model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1996.10607176
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |