UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Nurul Huda Kasim
Title :Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2019
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan modul pembelajaran berasaskan projek yang diintegrasikan dengan konsep Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (Modul PRO-STEM) dalam  topik Biodiversiti dan Ekosistem serta mengkaji kesannya terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi  (KBAT) dan kemahiran abad ke-21. Kajian ini menggunakan kajian reka kuasi eksperimen bagi menilai  keberkesanan modul. Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM adalah berpandukan Model Pembangunan Modul Sidek.  Modul PRO-STEM yang dibangunkan mempunyai kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan yang baik dengan indeks  kebolehpercayaan alfa Cronbach sebanyak 0.92. Kajian keberkesanan modul terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran  abad ke-21 dijalankan di sebuah sekolah menengah di daerah Batang Padang, Perak. Sampel kajian  melibatkan seramai 63 orang murid yang dipilih secara rawak kelompok, 33 daripadanya dalam kumpulan  rawatan manakala lagi 30 orang murid berada dalam kumpulan kawalan. Kumpulan rawatan menjalani  proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP) dengan menggunakan Modul PRO-STEM manakala kumpulan  kawalan pula menjalani PdP secara konvensional selama tujuh minggu. Ujian pra dan pasca KBAT serta  kemahiran abad ke-21 ditadbirkan kepada kedua-dua kumpulan rawatan dan kawalan. Keputusan analisis  ujian-t sampel bebas mendapati tiada perbezaan yang signifikan dari segi skor min ujian pra KBAT  antara kumpulan kawalan dengan kumpulan rawatan (t(61)=-1.44, p=0.89). Walaubagaimanapun, keputusan  analisis ujian-t sampel untuk ujian pasca KBAT menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan antara  kumpulan rawatan dengan kumpulan kawalan [t(61)=-2.61, p=0.01]. Ujian-t sampel bebas bagi ujian pra  kemahiran abad ke-21 menunjukkan tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara kumpulan kawalan dengan  kumpulan rawatan (t(61)=0.78, p=0.44), manakala bagi ujian pasca kemahiran abad ke-21, kumpulan  rawatan menunjukkan peningkatan yang lebih baik berbanding dengan kumpulan kawalan (t(61)=-6.00,  p=0.00). Kesimpulannya, penggunaan Modul PRO-STEM dalam PdP dapat meningkatkan KBAT dan kemahiran  abad ke-21 dalam kalangan murid dengan signifikan. Implikasinya, pendekatan pembelajaran berasaskan  projek yang disepadukan dengan konsep STEM boleh digunakan sebagai salah satu pendekatan PdP bagi  meningkatkan lagi kefahaman murid dalam mata pelajaran Sains.  

References

 

Ahmad Zamri Khairani. (2017). Assessing urban and rural teachers’ competencies in

STEM integrated education in Malaysia. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 87,

p. 04004). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20178704004

 

Aminah Ayob, Ong, E. T., Mazlini Adnan, Mohd Nasir Ibrahim, Jameyah Sheriff, & Noriah Mohd Ishak. 

(2015). Laporan STEM untuk Permata Negara, Kurikulum Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak 2015. Tanjung 

Malim.

 

Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Teaching Thinking Skills in Context- Based 

Learning: Teachers’ Challenges and Assessment Knowledge. Journal of Science Education and 

Technology, 21(2), 207–225. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7

 

Azian T. S. Abdullah, Muhammad Zaini Mohd Zain, Nair, S. G., Rusliza Abdullah, & Ihsan Ismail. 

(2016). PISA : Malaysia’s wake up call for a more balanced approach to educational delivery and 

attainment. In What can PISA 2012 data tell Us? (pp. 1– 15). Singapore: Sense Publisher.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014a). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran - Sains Tahun 

Enam. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian  Pembangunan  Kurikulum.  (2014b).  Elemen  KBAT  dalam  pentaksiran.

Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014c). Elemen KBAT dalam Sumber.Putrajaya: Kemeneterian 

Pendidikan Malaysia

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014d). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi: Aplikasi di 

Sekolah.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016a). Buku penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah 

(KSSM). Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016b). Panduan pelaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran berasaskan 

inkuiri. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016c). Sharing Malaysian experience in participation  of  girls  

in  STEM  education.  Geneva,  Switzerland:  UNESCO

International Bureau of Education (IBE).

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017a). Manual pelaksanaan pentaksiran sekolah.

Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017b). Pentaksiran kompetensi dan literasi Sains, Matematik dan 

Bacaan I ( PKLSMB I ) : Laporan awal. In Simposium TIMSS dan PISA 2017. Petaling Jaya.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017c). Siri bahan sumber Sains, Teknologi, Engineering dan 

Matematik (BSTEM), BSTEM Biologi. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan 

Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2016a). Laporan Kebangsaan PISA 2015. 

Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2016b). PISA 2015: PISA (Programme for 

International Student Assessment). Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2017). Jerayawara Inisiatif Perkukuhan 

STEM 2017; Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Sains Teknologi Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM). Putrajaya: 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet the 

challenge. Routledge. New York: Taylor & Francis. Dicapai pada 

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809921

 

Barak, M. (2013). Teaching engineering and technology: cognitive, knowledge and problem-solving 

taxonomies. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 11(3), 316–333. Dicapai pada 

https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-04-2012-0020

 

Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., & Mesutoglu, C. (2016). Moving STEM Beyond Schools: Students’ 

Perceptions About an Out-of-School STEM Education Program. International Journal of Education in 

Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1),

9. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.71338

 

Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing 

House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39– 43. Dicapai pada 

https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415

 

Berliner, D. C. (2004). Expert Teachers : Their Characteristics, Development and Accomplishments. 

De La Teoria? A l’aula: Formacio Del Professorat Ensenyament de Las Ciències Socials., 13–28.

 

Bernama. (2017). Revolusi industri 4.0 mampu wujudkan 1.5 juta pekerjaan. Malaysian

Digest. Shah Alam.

 

 

Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. (2015). Inquiry-based learning for science, technology,

engineering, and math (STEM) programs : a conceptual and practical resource for educators. 

Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learningg, 5, 3–19. Dicapai pada 

https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/S2055-364120150000004001

 

Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 

873. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1021/ed063p873

 

Borden, L. L., & Wiseman, D. (2016). Considerations From Places Where Indigenous and Western Ways 

of Knowing, Being, and Doing Circulate Together: STEM as Artifact of Teaching and Learning. 

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 140–152. Dicapai pada. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166292

 

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom.

Virginia USA: ASCD.

 

Butler, A. C., Marsh, E. J., Slavinsky, J. P., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2014). Integrating cognitive 

science and technology improves learning in a STEM classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 

331–340. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9256-4

 

Cabe Trundle, K., Atwood, R. K., Christopher, J. E., & Sackes, M. (2010). The effect of guided 

inquiry-based instruction on middle school students’ understanding of lunar concepts. Research in 

Science Education, 40(3), 451–478. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9129-x

 

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning; An integrated 

Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd ed.). Rotterdam, The 

Netherlands: Sense Publisher.

 

Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM 

project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics approach. 

In STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 

(STEM) approach (pp. 1–6).

 

Chang, P.-L., Hsu, C.-W., & Chang, P.-C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen 

production technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(21), 14172–14179. Dicapai 

pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045

 

Cheng, C., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision

theory.pdf, 142, 174–186.

 

Chin, W. (2014). The Effects of Project-Based Learning in High School Geometry.

Thesis. Department of Education.University of Hawai'i.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2006a). Asas statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan. Shah

Alam: McGraw- Hill Malaysia.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2006b). Kaedah penyelidikan. Shah Alam: McGraw- Hill Malaysia.

Clements, D., & Battista, M. (1990). Constructivist learning and teaching. The Arithmetic

Teacher, 38(1), 34–35. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-

8535.2007.00715.x

 

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education.

Professional Development in Education (Vol. 38). Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130

 

Costa, A. L. (1991). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. (Arthur,

Ed.) (Vol. 1). Virginia USA.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed, Vol. 4). Boston: Pearson Education.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

 

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods

Approaches. Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods

approaches. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

 

Daly, J. C., & Cohen, J. (1978). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences,

Revised Edition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(363), 680.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.2307/2286629

 

Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2016). 2020 Vision: Envisioning a new generation of

STEM learning research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 1–10.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9713-5

 

Donnelly, R., Fitzmaurice, M., & Centre, T. (2005). Designing Modules for Learning.

Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching, 99–110.

 

Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education

Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.

 

Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban High

School Students’ IT/STEM Learning: Findings from a Collaborative Inquiry- and

Design-Based Afterschool Program. Journal of Science Education and Technology,

23(1), 116–137. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9457-5

 

Edy Hafizan, Mohd Shahali, Lilia, H., Mohamad Sattar, R., & Kamisah, O. (2013).

Bitara-Stem Tm Training of Trainers’ Programme : Impact on Trainers’ Knowledge

, Beliefs , Attitudes and Efficacy Towards Integrated Stem Teaching. Journal of Baltic Science 

Education, 14(1), 85–96.

 

Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahali, Lilia Halim, Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Kamisah Osman, & Mohd Afendi 

Zulkifeli. (2016). STEM Learning through Engineering Design: Impact on Middle Secondary Students’ 

Interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Journal of 

Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189–1211. Dicapai pada 

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a

 

Fan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in 

engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 

107–129. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328- x

 

Faridah Musa, Norlaila Mufti, Rozmel Abdul Latiff, & Maryam Mohamed Amin. (2012).

Project-based Learning (PjBL): Inculcating Soft Skills in 21st Century Workplace. Procedia - Social 

and Behavioral Sciences, 59(2006), 565–573. Dicapai pada 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.315

 

Fauzi Hussin, Jamal Ali, & Mohd Saifoul Zamzuri Noor. (2016). Kaedah penyelidikan & analisis data 

SPSS (Cetakan Ke). Sintok: Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia.

 

Fazilah Razali, Othman Talib, Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf, & Siti Aishah Hassan. (2017).

A Measure of Students Motivation , Attitude and Parental Influence towards Interest in STEM Career 

among Malaysian Form Four Science Stream Student. International Journal of Academic Research in 

Business and Social Sciences, 7(2016), 245–264. Dicapai pada 

https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i14/3665

 

Francine, E., José, B., & Maldonado, C. (2011). IMA – CID : an integrated modeling approach for 

developing educational modules, 207–239. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s13173-011-0043-5

 

Gallagher, M. A. (2004). A constructivist approach to integrating science , technology , and 

engineering into preservice teacher education. Iowa State University.

 

Gallant, D. J. (2007). Science , Technology , Engineering , and Mathematics ( STEM ) Education. 

Ohio: Ohio State University.

 

Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam penyelidikan: Amalan dan 

analisis tindakan. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti

Malaya.

 

Glasersfeld, E. von. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. Constructivism in

Education, 3–16.

 

Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and

recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, (1),

83.

 

Gross, K., & Gross, S. (2017). Transformation: Constructivism, Design, Thinking and

Elementary Steam. Art Education, 69(6), 36–43. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224869

 

Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM Integration in

Middle School Life Science: Student Learning and Attitudes. Journal of Science

Education and Technology, 25(4), 550–560. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x

 

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data

Analysis(7th Ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

 

Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). How Science, Technology, Engineering,

and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (Pbl) Affects High, Middle, and

Low Achievers Differently: the Impact of Student Factors on Achievement.

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089–1113.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0

 

Han, S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2016). How science, technology, engineering,

and mathematics project based learning affects high-need students in the U.S.

Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 157–166. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.045

 

Han, S., Roslinda Rosli, Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). The effect of Science,

technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) on

students’ Achievement in four mathematics topics. Journal of Turkish Science

Education, 13(Specialissue). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10168a

 

Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’

implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journal

of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63–76. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a

 

Harris, C. J., Penuel, W. R., D’Angelo, C. M., DeBarger, A. H., Gallagher, L. P.,

Kennedy, C. A,Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Impact of project-based curriculum materials

on student learning in science: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1362–1385. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21263

 

Hazura Mohamed, Hairulliza Mohamad Judi, Siti Fadzilah M. Noor, & Zawiyah

M.Yusof. (2012). Jurang digital dan pendidikan di luar bandar : Tahap literasi

teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi pelajar. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information

Technology and Multimedia, 1(2), 1–13.

 

Hugerat, M. (2016). How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affects

the classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 1–13.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9212-y

 

Jack, B. M., & Lin, H. (2017). Making learning interesting and its application to the

science classroom. Studies in Science Education, 7267(April), 1–28. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1305543

 

Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (2nd

Ed). California: Thomson Higher Education.

Jackson, S. L. (2011). Research methods : A modular approach (2nd Ed). California:

Cengage Learning.

 

Jamalludin Harun, & Siti Nurulwahida Mohd Zainul Abidin. (2010). Pembangunan

modul pembelajaran berbantukan video interaktif bagi pembelajaran

pengaturcaraan visual basic berdasarkan pendekatan projek.

 

Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data.

Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284–301. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1

 

Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., & Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A Review of Science, Technology,

Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A

Malaysian Perspective. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology

Education, 10(3), 155–163. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a

 

Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching to

the test...or testing to teach: Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage

greater conceptual understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307–329.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9

 

John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural Approaches to Learning and

Development: A Vygotskyian Framework. Educational Psychologist. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3103&4_4

 

Jones, G., Dana, T., LaFramenta, J., Adams, T. L., & Arnold, J. D. (2016). STEM TIPS:

Supporting the beginning secondary STEM teacher. TechTrends, 60(3), 272–288.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0052-5

 

Jones, H., & Twiss, B. C. (1978). Forecasting technology for planning decisions. New

York: MacMillan. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(94)02000-F

 

Juan, J., Jr, R., & Sulaiman, F. (2016). The effectiveness of project – based learning (Egg

Drop Project) towards students’ real world connection in learning Physics.

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 5(8), 1–6.

 

Kamisah Osman, Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, & Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad. (2010).

Development and validation of the Malaysian 21st century skills instrument (M-

21CSI) for science students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 599–603.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.204

 

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM

education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025.

Education, 27(1), 1–268. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015a). Buletin Anjakan. Buletin Transformasi

Pendidikan Malaysia - PPPM 2013-2025, Bil 5/2015.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015b). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) dan

Perlaksanaan KBAT di Sekolah. Buletin Anjakan. Kementerian Pendidikan

Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015c). Laporan Tahunan 2015 Pelan

Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (Vol. XXXIII). Putrajaya.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-

014-0173-7.2

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015d). Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 : Amalan Dan

Pelaksanaan Di Sekolah.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015e). Pengenalan Kepada Pisa 2015. Putajaya:

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016a). Laporan TIMSS 2015. Putrajaya:

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016b). Panduan pelaksanaan sains, teknologi,

kejuruteraan dan matematik (STEM) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran.

Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum,Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017a). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah

Sains Tingkatan Dua: Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017b). Pendidikan STEM di Sekolah.Putrajaya:

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017c). Siri bahan sumber Sains, Teknologi,

Engineering dan Matematik (BSTEM). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan

Malaysia.

 

Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education.

Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.

 

Kim, Y., Hye-Eun, C., & Lim, G. (2015). Science curriculum changes and STEM

Education in East Asia. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Science Education in East Asia (pp.

1–629). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1

 

Koay, S. S., & Maria Salih. (2016). Miskonsepsi Murid Terhadap Sains Dalam Item-item

TIMSS. Penang, Malaysia: Publication Unit SEAMEO RECSAM, Penang Malaysia.

 

Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Instruction on 6th

Grade Turkish Students’ Achievement, Science Process Skills, and Attitudes

Toward Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78. Dicapai

pada https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942

 

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques. New Age

International (P) Ltd. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

 

Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). CHAPTER 19 PBL Kraichik. In R. K. S. (ed).

(Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University

Press.

 

Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. (2014). Teaching science in elementary and middle school.

A project-based approach (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

 

Langford, P. E. (2005). Vygotsky ’s developmental and educational psychology (First

Edit). New York: Psychology Press.

 

Laur, D. (2013). Authentic learning experiences, A real-world approach to Project-Based

Learning. New York: Routledge.

 

Lay, A., & Kamisah Osman. (2017). Developing 21 st century skills through a

Constructivist-Constructionist learning environment. K-12 STEM Education, 3(2),

205–216.

 

Lee, C. H., (2015). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan Modul Bio-STEM dalam pemupukan

kemahiran abad ke-21 dan peningkatan pencapaian bagi topik Nutrisi.

Thesis.Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Lee, C. H., & Kamisah Osman. (2014). Development and validation of the BTEM Module

to enhance 21st century skills. In R. P. Devadason, Zurida Ismail, & K. T. Ng (Eds.),

Empowering the future generation through science education (pp. 34–45). Penang,

Malaysia: SEAMEO RECSAM.

 

Lee, C. H., & Kamisah Osman. (2015). An interdisciplinary approach for Biology,

Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (BTEM) to enhance 21st century skills

in Malaysia. K-12 STEM Education, 1(3), 137–147.

 

Lee, S., Kang, E., & Kim, H.-B. (2015). Exploring the Impact of Students’ Learning

Approach on Collaborative Group Modeling of Blood Circulation. Journal of

Science Education and Technology, 24(3–Feb), 234–255. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9509-5

 

Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2013). Pentaksiran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi.

Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Lesseig, K., Nelson, T. H., Seidel, R. A., & Slavit, D. (2015). Supporting middle school

teachers’ implementation of STEM design challenges. In NARST 2015 Annual

International Conference (Vol. 116, pp. 177–188). Chicago, Illinois. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12172

 

Lesseig, K., Slavit, D., & Nelson, T. H. (2017). Jumping on the STEM bandwagon: How

middle grades students and teachers can benefit from STEM experiences. Middle

School Journal, 48(3), 15–24. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2017.1297663

 

Li, T. K., Yahaya, R., Supardy, N., & Hassan, H. A. (2014). Developing Higher Level

Questioning on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy before Using an Inquiry-Based Science

Approach. In D. R. Peter, Z. Ismail, & N. K. Thoe (Eds.), Empowering the future

generation through science education. Penang, Malaysia: SEAMEO RECSAM.

 

Lombardi, M. M. (2016). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century : An Overview

Authentic Learning for the 21st Century : Educase Learning Initiatives.

 

Lou, S., Chuang, S.-Y., Meng, H., Yeh, R. C., Tseng, K.-H., & Chang, C.-C. (2010). A

study of project-based STEM learning for senior high school students in Taiwan. In

American Society for Engineering Education. Kentucky.

 

Lou, S. J., Liu, Y. H., Shih, R. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The senior high school students’

learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL. International Journal of Technology

and Design Education, 21(2), 161–183. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9112-x

 

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantificatiom of Content Validity. Nursing

Research. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

 

Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of

educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science

Education, 95(5), 877–907. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441

 

Mazlini Adnan, Aminah Ayob, Ong, E. T., Mohd Nasir Ibrahim, Noriah Ishak, &

Jameyah Sherrif. (2016). Memperkasa pembangunan modal insan Malaysia di

peringkat kanak- kanak : Kajian kebolehlaksanaan dan kebolehintegrasian

pendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum PERMATA Negara. GEOGRAFIA Online

Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(1), 29–36.

 

Miettnen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey ’s theory of

reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1),

54–72. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1080/026013700293458

 

Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higherorder

thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education,

37(4), 353–369. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2

 

Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Lilia Halim, & Zanaton Ikhsan. (2016). Using STEM integrated

approach to nurture students’ interest and 21st century skills. The Eurasia

Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 4, 313–319.

 

Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Lilia Halim, Zanaton Ikhsan, Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahili, &

Raifana Rosa. (2015). Impact Studies of Integrated STEM Program. International

Journal of Technical Research and Applications, 35(35), 1–5.

 

Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil, Saedah Siraj, Zaharah Hussin, Nurulrabihah Mat Noh, &

Ahmad Ariffin Sapar. (2017). Pengenalan asas kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam

penyelidikan rekabentuk dan pembangunan (2nd editio). Bangi: Minda Intelek

Agency.

 

Mohd Sahandri Gani Hamzah, Laily Paim, Sharifah Azizah Haron, & Mohd Faizal Nizam

Lee Abdullah. (2013). Buku panduan pembinaan instrumen “Anda dan

Kepenggunaan.” Tanjung Malim: Emeritus Publications

 

Mohd Yazid Mohd Shariff. (2013). Keberkesanan penggunaan perisian Google Sketch-

Up terhadap peningkatan pencapaian dan minat pelajar dalam subtopik Lukisan

Ortografik Tingkatan Dua. Jurnal Bahagian Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2013).

 

Moore, T. J., Hynes, M. M., Purzer, Ş., Glancy, A. W., Siverling, E. A., Tank, K. M.,

Guzey, S. S. (2015). STEM integration: Evidence of student learning in designbased

curricula. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2015–

Febru(February). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044216

 

Moreno, N. P., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G., Newell, A. D., & Burnett, C. A. (2016). Preparing

Students for Middle School Through After-School STEM Activities. Journal of

Science Education and Technology. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-

016-9643-3

 

MOSTI. (2016). Dasar Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi Negara: Putrajaya: Kementerian

Sains,Teknologi dan Inovasi Malaysia.

 

Muhammad Syukri, Soewarno, S., Lilia Halim, & Lilia Ellany Mohtar. (2018). The

impact of engineering design process in teaching and learning to enhance students’

science problem-solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 66–75.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.12297

 

Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. D. Avison & J.

Pries-Heje. London: Sage Publications.

 

Murray, E. C. (2011). Implementing Higher-Order Thinking in Middle School

Mathematics Classrooms.Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology.

 

Museum of Science Boston. (2008). Engineering the Future : Science, Technology, and

design process: Teacher Guide. Engineering. California: Key Curriculum Press.

 

National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education. Washington, D.C.:

The National academy Press. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.17226/13158

 

National Research Council. (2012). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and

school (Expanded E). Washington D.C: National Academy Press. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-88415-752-6.50153-3

 

New York Department of Education. (2009). Project-Based Learning: Inspiring Middle

School Students to Engage in Deep and Active Learning.

 

Newhouse, C. P. (2017). STEM the Boredom: Engage Students in the Australian

Curriculum Using ICT with Problem-Based Learning and Assessment. Journal of

Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 44–57. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9650-4

 

Newman, J. L., Dantzler, J., & Coleman, A. N. (2015). Science in Action: How Middle

School Students Are Changing Their World Through STEM Service-Learning

Projects. Theory into Practice, 54(1), 47–54. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.977661

 

Ng, C.H, & Mazlini Adnan. (2018). Integrating STEM education through Project-Based

Inquiry Learning (PIL) in topic space among year one pupils. In IOP Conference

Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 296, p. 012020). Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012020

 

Nitce Isa Medina Machmudi, & Mai Shihah Abdullah. (2013). Pembelajaran Berasaskan

Projek : Takrifan , Teori dan Perbandingannya dengan Pembelajaran Berasaskan

Masalah. CREAM -Current Research in Malaysia, 2(1), 181–194.

 

Noor Haniza, & Effandi Zakaria. (2017). Penerapan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi

Melalui Pembelajaran Berasaskan Projek Pengajaran Sains Sekolah Rendah. STEd

2017 : Seminar on Transdisciplinary Education, 9–17.

 

Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan (2nd ed.). Mc-Graw Hill

Education.

 

Norazla Mustafa, Zaleha Ismail, Zaidatun Tasir, & Mohd Nihra Haruzuan Mohamad

Said. (2016). A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education.

Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225–4288. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8111

 

Nur Fadhila Baharudin. (2016). Pembinaan dan keberkesanan Modul PBM-SC2

Terhadap KBAT, Motivasi dan Refleksi Pelajar. Thesis. Universiti Pendidikan

Sultan Idris.

 

Nur Fadzlillah Amira Mohd Noor, Aminuddin Hassan, & Nor Aniza Ahmad. (2017).

Relationship between Emotional, Intelligence, Motivation and Logical Reasoning

towards Academic Achievement among Secondary School Students. International

Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.

 

Nur Farhana Ramli, & Othman Talib. (2017). Can Education Institution Implement

STEM ? From Malaysian Teachers’ View. International Journal of Academic

Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 721–732. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i3/2772

 

Nur Suhaidah Sukor, Kamisah Osman, & Maria Abdullah. (2010). Students’ achievement

of Malaysian 21st Century Skills in Chemistry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral

Sciences, 9, 1256–1260. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.316

 

Nurashikin Muzafar. (2015). Pembinaan Modul Bio Three dan kesannya terhadap

penguasaan konsep serta kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi murid tingkatan empat.

Thesis. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Nyet, Moi Siew, Nazir Amir, & Chin, L. C. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and

in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science.

SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1–20. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-8

 

Nyet Moi Siew, Goh, H., & Fauziah Sulaiman. (2016). Integrating STEM in an

engineering design process: The learning experience of rural secondary school

students in an outreach challenge program. Journal of Baltic Science Education,

15(4), 477–493.

 

O’loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond piagetian constructivism

toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching, 29(8), 791–820. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290805

 

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling

real-life problems (Vol. V). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208070-

en

 

Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and

Learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education Ver. I, 5(6), 2320–

7388. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670

 

Othman Talib. (2017). SPSS: Analisis data kuantitatif untuk penyelidik muda (Cetakan

Ke). Bangi: MPWS Rich Publication.

 

Paiva, C. E., Barroso, E. M., Carneseca, E. C., de Padua Souza, C., Dos Santos, F. T.,

Mendoza Lopez, R. V., & Ribeiro Paiva, S. B. (2014). A critical analysis of testretest

reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative

care: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 8. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-8

 

Peters-Burton, E. E., Lynch, S. J., Behrend, T. S., & Means, B. B. (2014). Inclusive STEM

high school design: 10 critical components. Theory into Practice, 53(1), 64–71.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.862125

 

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of

Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health,

30(4), 459–467. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1002/nur

 

Ragsdale, S. (2014). Project-based Learning as a Means for Meeting the Needs of 21st

Century Students in Common Core States. Lindewood University.

 

Rajendran, N. . (2017). Pengajaran dan penguasaan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi:

Teori dan amalan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit UPSI.

 

Ramlan Mustapha, & Ghazali Darusalam. (2018). Aplikasi kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam

penyelidikan sains sosial (1st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

 

Richey, R. ., & Klein, J. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge

from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher

Education, 16(2), 23–38. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961473

 

Ritz, J. M., & Fan, S. C. (2014). STEM and technology education: international state-ofthe-

art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 429–451.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9290-z

 

Rohani Arbaa, Hazri Jamil, & Mohammad Zohir Ahmad. (2017). Model Bersepadu

Penerapan Kemahiran Abad ke-21 dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal

Pendidikan Malaysia, 42(1), 1–11.

 

Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2015). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21stcentury

teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(October 2012), 8–13. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203

 

Saavendra, A. R., & Opfer, V. darleen. (2014). Learning 21st Century-skills Requires

21st century Teaching, 94(1), 41–44.

 

Sahin, A. (2015). A practice based model for STEM Teaching (1st ed.). Houstan, USA:

Sense Publisher.

 

STEM Students on the Stage ( SOS ): Promoting Student Voice and Choice in STEM

Education Through an Interdisciplinary , Standards-focused , Project Based

Learning Approach. Journal of STEM Education, (September), 24–34.

 

Sanders, M. (2012). Integrative Stem Education As “ Best Practice .” In 7th Biennial

International Technology Education Research Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 1–15).

 

Sangoseni, O., Hellman, M., & Hill, C. (2013). Development and Validation of a

questionnaire to assess the effect of online learning on behaviors, attitudes, and

clinical practices of physical therapists in the United States regarding evidencedbased

clinical practice. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice,

11(2), 1–12.

 

Sazilah Sam, & Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah. (2017). Development and evaluation

of form three mathematics i-Think module (Mi-T3) on algebraic formulae topic. In

AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1847). Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983895

 

Sidek Mohd Noah. (2002). Reka bentuk penyelidikan; falsafah, teori dan praktis.

Serdang, Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Sidek Mohd Noah, & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul, bagaimana membina

modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang, Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra

Malaysia.

 

Singh, S., & Yaduvanshi, S. (2015). Constructivism in Science Classroom : Why and

How. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(3), 1–5.

 

Sivertsen, M. L., Riley, R. W., & Robinson, S. P. (1993). State of the art transforming

ideas and learning. A guide for elementary science education. Washington D.C: US

Department of Education.

 

Slough, S. W., & Milam, J. O. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning. STEM Project-

Based Learning an Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics

(STEM) approach. Texas: Sense Publisher. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6

 

Stone-MacDonald, A., Wendell, K., Douglas, A., & Love, M. L. (2015). Engaging young

engineers teaching problem solving through STEM. Baltimore, Maryland: Paul H

Brookes Publishing Co. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1680/jdare.16.00054

 

Stozhko, N., Bortnik, B., Mironova, L., Tchernysheva, A., & Podshivalova, E. (2015).

Interdisciplinary project-based learning: Technology for improving student

cognition. Research in Learning Technology, 23(July). Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.27577

 

Sukiman Saad, Noor Shah Saad, & Mohd Uzi Dollah. (2014). Pengajaran Kemahiran

Berfikir: Persepsi Dan Amalan Guru Matematik Semasa Pengajaran Dan

Pembelajaran Di Bilik Darjah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia,

2(1), 18–36.

 

Taber, K. S. (2017). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting

Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 1–24.

Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

 

Thomas, B., & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian

approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development,

45, 42–53. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002

 

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA:

Autodesk Foundation., 13(415), 2003. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-

009-0302-x

 

Thys, M., Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W., & Laevers, F. (2016). Investigating the

quality of project-based science and technology learning environments in

elementary school: a critical review of instruments. Studies in Science Education,

52(1), 1–27. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2015.1078575

 

Tsai, H. Y., Chung, C. C., & Lou, S. J. (2018). Construction and development of iSTEM

learning model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology

Education, 14(1), 15–32. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78019

 

Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science,

technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning

(PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,

23(1), 87–102. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x

 

Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, Kamisah Osman, & Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad. (2012). M-

21CSI : A validated 21 st century skills instrument for secondary science students.

Asian Social Science, 8(16), 38–44. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n16p38

 

Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad, & Kamisah Osman. (2010). The

relationship of 21st century skills on students’ attitude and perception towards

physics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 546–554. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.073

 

Turiman, P., Jizah Omar, Adzliana Mohd Daud, & Kamisah Osman. (2012). Fostering

the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills.

Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253

 

UNESCO. (2015). Malaysia National Education for All Review Report. World Education

Forum, 1–128.

 

Wan Nor Fadzilah, W. A., Nurazidawati, M. O., Lilia, H., Mohamad Sattar, R., Kamisah,

O., & Zanaton, I. (2016). Fostering students ’ 21st century skills through Project

Oriented Problem Based Learning ( POPBL ) in integrated STEM education

program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1).

 

Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM Integration :

Teacher Perceptions and Practice STEM Integration. Journal of Pre-College

Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 1–13. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636

 

Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning.

Science Education, 75(1), 9–21. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750103

 

Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. (2015). STEM Education. Annual Review of Sociology,

41(1), 331–357. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659

 

Yusri Mohamad Yusop, Melati Sumari, Fatanah Mohamed, Shahriza Said, Mohd Ibrahim

K.Azeez, & Jamil, M. R. M. (2015). The needs analysis in self-concept module

development. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(1), 44–55.

 

Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., &

Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study:

Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication.

Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. Dicapai pada

https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017

 

Zanaton Iksan. (2007). Amalan Penyoalan Lisan Guru Kimia Dalam Pengajaran Dan

Pembelajaran Elektrokimia. Universiti Malaya.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.